Someone who's going to need their permit reissued, re-upped, or even have applied in and around September 1st of this year coming up. Or you need to have a renewal before, say, April 1st of 2023. What am I talking about? Well, we've talked about the new law that New York's Governor Kathy Hochul has forced through, basically as a challenge to the Supreme Court, saying you can't tell us what to do, you know, You're the third branch government. You can't tell us tyrants what to do So they passed all kinds of restrictions on where you can have your firearm Basically the whole state and all populous areas are a gun-free zone. I've covered it in several videos I'll have some linked above but thanks to my friend Matt in New York. He got me this information I'm gonna give you some quick points and then I'm gonna show you the actual internal email from Judge Murphy of the Saratoga County court system. So these are some of the points on the leaked internal email. All permits pending on September 1st of 2022 must be updated or resubmitted with the new requirements. Which requirements are we talking about? Well, we can't do the proper cause, so now we're going to do good moral character. Six of one, half a dozen of another, same, same. Another way to say to the Supreme Court, you're not going to stop us from restricting people's rights. Now that's important because of... how things will proceed going forward. New York has decided that there's going to be a new training requirement for this permit. Several hours of classroom, several hours of, you actually have to qualify. You even have to go meet with a judge in person, which, like I told you in the sheriff's video about the New York State Sheriff's Association, they say that's not going to happen. I mean, what judge is going to take time out of his busy day on the golf course or in a court? to meet with people who want to carry a gun in New York. Probably not going to happen much. But the state police have until, or the superintendent of the state police, you might have heard of him before, it's Mr. Bruin, famous from New York State Rifle and Pistol Association vs. Bruin. Well Bruin has until April 1st of 2023 to establish the new training course. So the new training course that you need once this new law goes into effect on September 1st, That it doesn't even exist so they're requiring you to have something that does not exist yet. So what are they gonna do? Well, there's a potential for a seven month period between September 1st and April 1st of 2023 where no license will be issued where no licenses will be issued also the good moral character clause now means quote having the essential character temperament and judgment necessary to be entrusted with a weapon and to use it only in a manner that does not endanger oneself or others. Well, if someone's endangering my life, I am all day long good to go in defending myself. If they're going to use any type of force that threatens my life or serious bodily injury, then I am going to use deadly force. So that weapon is going to cause somebody else some pain and some issues with decisions they made that forced my hand. New York says, ah, you can't do that. Again, all applicants must meet in person with the licensing officer in Saratoga County. In this case, it's Judge Murphy for an interview. And that's going to create a tremendous backlog like I just alluded to. So on screen is a quick section of this email from the judge. If anyone calls regarding their pistol license, please, as usual, refer them to the pistol license office at the Sheriff's Department. as an aside, and by way of providing you with background information, the undersheriff advises me as follows. All permits issued after September 1st must follow the new rule, so anything pending on that date will need to be updated or resubmitted. State Police and DCGIS have until April 1st, 2023 to come up with the new course that everyone needs. So after September 1st, we can't issue any permits until after DC just approves the course requirements, notifies the instructors, gets the proposed courses back from the instructors, approves them, and then the courses can be taught. Only then can you issue permits again. So, not only are they infringing, but they're going to cancel the Second Amendment or the ability to obtain a permit in New York, the entire state, because of Kathy Hochul and her tyrannical ways. See, New York is getting sued again by a fire policy coalition for their assault weapon ban by gun owners of America for what I'm talking about now for their new concealed carry infringements and there will be more lawsuits coming. So I just wanted to get this out there. This is what's going on in New York. It's going to happen because I don't see them creating a new licensing class and getting it to instructors and having instructors propose courses of fire and training and then have judges or whoever the licensing official is in your county in New York, they're not going to be available to meet everybody. So this should absolutely be concerning. My guess is you're going to hear a lot more about this soon. So stay in the know by subscribing to Guns N' Gadgets. Share this, guys and gals, with everybody. If you don't live in New York State, share this. Everybody in New York State needs to know this. Every gun group needs to understand this. I'm sure most of them do. But it's time, guys and gals. New York is challenging America again, challenging the Constitution again, and they're going to get an even bigger smackdown. And hopefully it doesn't even take that long. Guys and gals, with that, I will bid you adieu for video number two for the day already. Please subscribe to the channel down below if you want to stay in the know. Turn on the bell icon, turn it to all notifications so that you are made aware of when I drop new content or go live. And hit that like button and share it so that more people who need to see this will see this. Until we see each other again, please be safe, stay vigilant, and carry a gun to keep you, your friends, your family, your community safe. That's what it's for, even if you live behind the iron curtains of New York State. Take care. the other night that I didn't understand. A figure walked in through the mist with a flintlock in his hand. His clothes were torn and dirty as he stood there by my bed. He took off his three-cornered hat and speaking low to me, he said, we fought a revolution to secure our liberty. We wrote the Constitution as a shield from tyranny. For future generations, this legacy we gave. In this, the land of the free. and home of the brave. The freedoms we secured for you we hoped you'd always keep. The tyrants labored endlessly while your parents were asleep. Your freedom's gone, your courage lost, you're no more than a slave. In this, the land of the free and home of the brave. You buy permits to travel and permits to own a gun. Permits to start a business or to build a place for one. On land that you believe you own, you pay a yearly rent. Although you have no voice in saying how the money's spent, your children must attend a school that doesn't educate, and your Christian values can't be taught according to the state. You read about the current news in a regulated press, and you pay a tax you do not owe to please the IRS. Your money is no longer made of silver nor of gold. You trade your wealth for paper so your life can be controlled. You pay for crimes that make our nation turn from God and shame. This number, you've traded in your name. You've given government control to those who do you harm so they could burn down churches and seize the family farm and keep our country deep in debt. Put men of God in jail. Harash your fellow countrymen while corrupted courts prevail. Your public servants don't uphold the solemn oaths they've sworn. And your daughters visit doctors so their children won't be born. Your leaders send artillery and guns to foreign shores and send your sons to slaughter fighting other people's wars. Can you regain the freedoms for which we fought and died? Or don't you have the courage or the faith to stand with pride? And are there no more values for which you'll fight to save? Or do you wish your children to live in fear and be a slave? O sons of the Republic, arise, take a stand, defend the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the land, preserve our great Republic and each God given right, and pray to God to keep the torch of freedom burning bright. As Iowoki vanished in the mist from whence he came, his words were true, we are not free, but we have ourselves to blame. For even now as tyrants trample each God given right we only watch and tremble too afraid to stand and fight If he stood by your bedside in a dream while you were asleep and wondered what remains of the freedoms he'd fought to keep What would be your answer? He called out from the grave for your training and you will come back alive good Afternoon ladies and gentlemen, this is the First hour of the afternoon intelligence report, Amber Kearney. One day closer to victory for all of our brothers and sisters, both on and behind the lines, in occupied territories west, southeast, east, and north. Ladies and gentlemen, you were listening to us on... www.libertytreeradio.4mg.com, libertytreeradio.org, we're also on satellite, let's say hi, to all of our friends, all points of the compass and virtually on every ocean on the planet, say thank you for listening in and or rebroadcasting and sharing, we appreciate that. Also a myriad of communications technologies, both inside and outside these United States. It is the 13th of July. No, not July the 13th. This day, it means nothing. Absolutely nothing. No, Wednesday the 13th? Yeah, Wednesday the 13th. Oh well. Anyway, it is the 14th year of open obvious and pissing in your face Fabian socialist and Soviet socialist occupation of America with a K. 2022 Old Earth calendar, 2022 battle for the Republic, the Dance of Swords. And it is Weapons Wednesday, by the way. A couple things here real quick. I'll tell you what, we have a caller. What do we have? It's the Colorado. Go ahead, call or jump in there, please. Yeah. Yesterday, AN slash PRC 77. As we know, the PRC 77s and PRC 25s. The Prick 77 is a handier because it doesn't have any tube in it. You can run off 12 volts, which means at the bottom you put your two wires, plug in your cigarette lighter, plug in your car, use it that way a lot. And if you have a 25 and you got somebody good, you can put a 5 volt regulator off that 12 volt line and it'll feed that tube real well. Try for a Prick 77 if you have a chance. Yeah, that was the big jump All-solid state the 77 actually this is why it's still in service with a bunch of different armies overseas Because it's easy to fix. This is one thing you gotta remember guys Everybody's got these cool little tiny radios the Star Trek communicators contrary to the television series Star Trek Standing there with a a hat pin and you know wishful thinking isn't gonna fix the microcircuitry on board On the other hand, a solder gun or a solder pen and a little bit of common sense and that PRC-77 can be back up online in a reasonable period of time. So that's the advantage of the two. I know it's a heavier radio. That's the first thing that says it's heavy. Well, look at it this way. Take the PRC-77 and at the very least use it like a vehicle command radio nowadays. Exactly what you have something like that you're using in 12. Yeah, a 12-volt system. You could use it with any kind of power supply inverter and adjust your power supply accordingly because there's all kinds of neat tricks out there, especially in inverter supplies or at least in DC-DC adjustments. The thing is that it's a robust radio guys that takes a beating. You drop it off the back of a deuce to half, and they don't do that very often. You don't drop eggs, do you? But in this case it ate a box of eggs. The thing would take a lot of abuse because it was tested for that. So in a vehicle, especially in a four wheel drive or six wheel drive all terrain vehicle, it can handle the kind of abuse you're probably going to give it. The whole thing is rubber baby buggy bumper on the inside intentionally they thought it through and that's why like I said it's enduring and that the reason we're seeing surplus come back to us now is because all these radios have been in service overseas for all the time since Vietnam. And this is 2022, and there's still parts coming back. In fact, here's the thing. I don't know that we're going to see much of that because as everybody starts gearing up for the next war, so to speak, you don't chuck the stuff that works. Not if you're a thinking country. And most countries don't have buckets of money or fake digits like we do, so they got to work with what they got. And that's why I was surprised to see some of the parts that are coming in right now. So again, Fair Radio is why I mentioned it yesterday, fairradio.com. And also, keep an eye on Gun Parts Corp. and also Apex Gun Parts. That's why I said go look in their miscellaneous section. There's a lot of stuff that shows up there and it's not guns. So you never know what you're going to see or what they run into a crate of something they forgot that was in the back barn. All of a sudden you got this, you know, vintage equipment that, oh, there's that widget I need. And that's how we're running into a lot of this stuff too, where people are moving things around and realizing they better start clearing out old inventory. That helps too. So anything else, call her, please jump in there. That's it. Thanks Mark. I'm out. Well, appreciate it. Thank you again. Thank you for the input. That's the demarcation line between the two systems is tube, no tube. And by the way, we run a bunch of ANPRC H9s and 10s. I bought those years ago from Barnacle Wharf Trading Company at about $27.50 a piece, brand new, unissued, old inventory. And the only difference is they slide up the radio scale, guys, so you can take the H9s and 10s. They overlap slightly, but the advantage of the H9s and 10s is you can run a platoon network, a company network separate from that, and even a battalion network separate from that with three radios. Three different radios. You've got three ROs, one, you know, talking to each one. You don't want to keep changing frequencies up. trying to go up and down the command structure if you can help and there's a reason and I've talked about this many times and in fact thank you for bringing us up because I just saw this happen with somebody with a bao fiang radio they were getting pissed at their bao fiang radio they were talking and that nobody was talking back and they were and they knew the radio worked and all this Chinese junk well yet is chinese junk we will tell you that But the Chinese junk normally works. Well, lo and behold, he looked down and well that radio wasn't adjusted to the proper frequencies. So he was shouting to the moon, but he wasn't going to get any response because unless somebody else was tuned into that frequency and it wasn't his tactical frequency that they were using for their little exercise, then nobody's going to hear you. This is one of the reasons in the military like on the all of these backpack radios and on your Fix station like a and GRC 125 and any vehicle kit radios They have lockdowns for the frequency guys a little thumb lock, you know you adjust if you'll notice right in the center of that buzz dial You've got a little little thumb screw Well, that's designed so you can make sure it doesn't get boo boo down about a station and off frequency And there was a reason, experience, okay, and this had happened in the past. So the neat thing about military radios is they have all of those features that aren't necessarily on the civilian counterparts. This is another reason when you're using tactical radios that are commercial, and I've mentioned this many times, I know that there's really nice, for instance, CBs out there that have every bell and whistle on them, but the more controls there are on a radio. Somebody's in a vehicle. They jump in the vehicle. Somebody told them go to Channel 7 and while they're busy fiddle farting with that or thinking they knew what they were doing, they don't know the radio that well. They're wearing tactical gloves. Maybe they're wearing armored gloves. You know, it's a little thick. And so they're trying to adjust things. Well, they don't know. They slid the squelch one way, the gain the other. And then finally they found the, yeah, there's the channel. Yeah, okay. Click, click, click, click in seven and I'm not hearing anything. And this is a reason for simply using simpler systems for closer smaller unit operations designated our rows where your radio operators Have more for our typically have familiarity with their equipment or should And so they're gonna be paying attention But if you have a lot of other personnel and especially with the adrenaline rush all the other problems that can happen Unfriendly fire which is everybody's fire the stuff coming from our guns stuff coming from their guns When that's happening, the old sphincter factor goes up. And that's when boo-boos are made, and a missed communication can be critical to not only saving somebody in the close local contact, but it might change the battlefield. So we have to take communications seriously. And by the way, I love the NPR-C77s. I've got five right now that are nearby, that are already deployed. And extra backpacks, the actual backpack fixture that goes with it from the Vietnam era, that really never changed. I don't think they made a replacement for it. I mean, the only other thing you do is put it in the Alice pack and the inside what's called the radio pouch. Inside your LS pack you've got that second little sleeve that's towards the frame. Well there's a reason for that. It keeps the radio next to the frame. You can cinch it and it keeps it from bobbling around inside the backpack but it conceals the radio. So the RO was not as obvious. That was one of the other reasons they did that because radio operators are one of those people that people are usually looking to put a bullet in. Okay, something else to think about, which is another reason for concealing the antenna in different ways and why we configure equipment so that it's much, much more difficult for someone to, you know, kind of particular occupational person to become an occupational hazard casualty. It happens a lot, okay, if you're not careful. So, prior to proper planning prevents piss-poor performance. And again, fairradio.com, F-A-I-R, fairradio.com. And also, like I said, go over to Gunbarts Corp and then go over to the Miscellaneous section. There's a bunch of stuff they've been adding. And in their surplus specifically. Also, over at, of all places, Apex, which is kind of like Gunbarts, they're the same business. They have a big miscellaneous section too and a lot of innocuous stuff pops in there all the time. A third company that's on the sidebar from Fair Radio is also Coleman's. Now, Coleman's.com, I will tell you this from experience, called them and asked them if they have something, if they have certain things, because they don't list everything like nobody lists everything they have on the shelf, on the internet, no one. But most important is they have stuff that's they just figure well, there's totally a certain limited interest and why bother They have some really unique vehicle System parts that we've been acquiring that we I don't mention for a reason. I want all of them They only have so many teams of them left and I'm gonna buy every last one of them if I have my way So because I need them for the vehicles, especially the armored vehicles. So these are perfect. Good to go to us But Coleman's just another good one to check out. Go ahead, caller. Jump in there, please. Hey, Will from Florida. Sorry to change the subject, especially when it's not something I really, you know, have the ability to do right now. But I've been looking and I was curious. What would be superior if you could afford either one a G3 knockoff or an FAL? Loan because I see a lot of reviews that both of them, you know People say the other one is better than the other and I know one of my militia youtubers uses a G3 I was just wondering what do you what's your opinion on the difference between the FAL and the G3 and the modern battlefield for guerrilla use? The G3, the HK91, slash the PTR91 is probably your first best choice right now as much as anything else because of economics. I see economics. Yeah, the price of mags. The FAL mags have been on a big roller coaster for a long time. However, also just reliability of the rifle. Maine Military, I mentioned Maine Military yesterday. Maine was the first company, if you recall, if guys have been listening for a while. that got into PTR when nobody else would touch him. And he had the widest selection, main military, had the widest selection of the G3, HK91, PTR91 knockoffs in the system. He had everything right from the get go. And he had the best price in the country and still has a good price on him. I just don't know what he's carrying right now. The big thing here again is the rifle itself, There's one big advantage to the G3 over all of the others and its steel case ammo. Always remember that the HKs were developed for and it was always understood. They were never a sidebar. They were a secret program outside of Germany when Germany was trying to rebuild again when they built the Setme rifle design in Spain. All that was was HK hiding their research and development projects, okay? When they finished what they wanted, when they found out what they needed to find out about the rifle, they just slid it sideways and created the G3, you know, family of weapons. Of course, the MP5 comes out of that and all the rest of the 223 guns that come after the 308s. The big advantage is that Germany already knew in World War I Now, World War II, in World War I, they already knew that if they went to war within six months, they would have to switch to 100% steel case production unless there was some alleviation of import pressures. All of their designs had to be robust, over-engineered, and strong, and be able to deal with steel case lacquered ammunition. When World War II came about, they had the exact same policy, which is why if you collect any ammunition from World War II, after about 1941, the lion's share of the ammunition is steel case lacquered, typically in that gray matte finish that you see, or that kind of wine brown. Same colors you see with the Russian ammunition from that period on, because basically they just copied it. So when Germany started to re-institute the Wehrmacht, oh I'm sorry, hei-hale the Wehrmacht, I mean the Bundeswehr. When the Bundeswehr was brought about, the same policy for the Cold War was already adopted and it was understood that there wouldn't even be a cycle down of production, that they would be going to steel case ammunition immediately. The roller block system, the nature of the extractor and how aggressive it is and how it's designed was designed to deal with steel case ammunition. Period. So does that include the civilian copies or robust enough to take steel case ammunition? The same design factors were tied in, but not only that, a good portion of the PTRs originally were all running off the massive G3 surplus inventory. So the advantage you've got is even in the spare parts that are out there, they're all built for that program. In fact, if you were to go to any of the companies that have spare parts, Sarco, Gun Parts Corp, whatever, Center Fire even has parts for the G3. The PTR 91 slash HK, everybody does because there was such a surfier of parts kids who actually rid you of his rifles and they chopped him up. But there's such a surfeit of parts that when they proceeded with production through the Portuguese factory that is PTR, basically what happened is when Portugal phased out its naval, I think it was the naval model, PTR, naval model HK, what they did is the guy brought it up, brought it to the US and created PTR. All of the specs and all of his tooling is literally HK for all practical purposes, if not HK. It's some of the highest quality tooling that was built in Spain based upon the CETME production facilities. So the design is sound. In fact, the CETME has the same reliability with regard to steel caves. Or it's engineered, it was supposed to. Now, here's the one thing that we don't see in the new PTRs, but they've adjusted with barrel configuration. You might recall if you had an HK91, when you injected the brass and you looked at it, your brass looked funny. Anybody remember why your brass looked funny on the original HKs that came in? They were based on military. Ping the back of the ejection port. I had this little bumper that I bought that snapped on there. Now you have to weld one. Yeah, it's a little piece. I had a little ding from that highly aggressive extraction process number one number two if you paid attention and you started to get some carbon buildup You could see a little waffle pattern on your case Now the Russians built the same kind of barrel during World War two with the Tokarev rifle in fact There are four different barrels for the Tokarev. You can tell what period it was made by the pattern of what looks like a waffle print on your case. Now what this is, they cut striations into the chamber that allowed for a limited amount of back gas check so that when the round was fired, a small amount of gas evacuated back down these lines, compressed the case and worked like an ejector, like a gas-gas injection assist. And so when your weapon gets really dirty, it starts to print carbon and you could actually see. Now here's the other thing about that. A lot of people did not want to reload HK brass because of two things. That little dent that was mentioned, which by the way you can get over. That's going to get blown back out the next time you choose. And unless you've reloaded it a lot and it's been bent in the same exact place a hundred times, well not a hundred, five, ten times, the case is viable. It's just not pretty. Okay, but for utility volume fire, it'd be fine. With the HKs, the same kind of idea was applied because it was something they thought, hey, that'll work. We've got the new Crip barrels that the Germans came up with for the G3. That was a special, again, temperature-treated barrel. If anybody doesn't remember, go look it up. HKs, all kind of good stuff on HK out there. What happened is they applied this design so that it would assist with what they knew was going to be steel case consumption right from the get-go were they to get into World War III. By the way, the newer rifles don't have these accommodations, which I think is bizarre because everybody seems to think that it'll either be, I guess, a very short work because everybody's going to die of something other than bullets. Or you've got a bunch of punks who have completely ignored history about logistics. And I've told you before guys, logistics, logistics, logistics. So, either at the strategic level or right down to the tactical level. The big advantage of the HK as far as the new PTRs is that they, over the original HKs, is that you do have a picatinny rail now that has a permanent fixture on the roof, which means you don't have to buy any of the specialized claw. scope mounts. I have probably about 11 of them. 11 of the original, was it Hirschfeld, Midlap, whatever. There's four. Yeah, the static. It's a static fixture, but it was done by, there were three different contractors. And the thing is that when they put these together, they're a good system, they had weight, that's the only thing, they had weight to the gun. But overall, You know my attitude, I like the M1A, you're probably seeing me with an M1A. But as far as PTR-91s, I'll tell you what, I've got a lot more than PTR-91s, okay? I've got HKs you've never seen that were part of these little pulse of import rifles that were allowed to be brought in, hell, Greece brought in. A bunch of HKs came in from Greece that were, some I don't know, they were standard HK parts, they were a standard contract gun. And they're floating around out there, but I haven't seen one in a very long time. The other neat thing is that, again, although I would not do this, I know a lot of people like the collapsing stock. The advantage of collapsing stock was for mechanized troops. It was not because it made the gun better, faster, or more accurate. It was designed to compress the gun to take up less space or less snag and tag when you're moving in and out of an armored vehicle. And that was its purpose plus of course it also would be an enhancement with the urban warfare to shorten the gun So you can kind of swing it around in closer quarters But for the most part again, we're all heavy infantry and The thick stock is still your best choice, but there are a number of different options and there's even a whole Manufacturing group guys if you don't like the stock you've got there are several and they aren't cheap Marksman's or sniper stocks if you want to call Matt for the HK that are very well built and built to original German specs for some of the knockoff programs that they had so Other than you'll pay a quarter. You'll pay a quarter of the price of the rifle for a Yeah, like that. Yeah, I know And they're not like but they sure that's it well Yeah, one of the things about those are designed to tailor the gun to make it a mark and marksman's rifle and again between all the other features that the PTR gives you to kind of keep the weight down with the Picatinny rail now an integrated part You're shaving Well quite a few ounces of weight off the gun where you normally would mount a scope or a night vision device or whatever It's not that I would get rid of the other Mounts because you have too many weapons that don't have that rail So you need those mounts if you're going to, for instance, mount night vision to the top of the weapon. Something to take into consideration there. One of the other advantages of the PTR is they do offer a number of lengths of barrel that we could never have gotten from HK. I'm not impressed with short barrels, you know that. But guys, they did build a few longer barrel PTRs. So if you want to get more energy out of that 7.62x51 NATO round, then that's a good choice. The big thing is, in pecking order for the steel case, it would be the, obviously the HK family of rifles to include the PTR. The FNFL and the M14 are then side by side, and the AR-10 is on the bottom of the list. But so is the AR-15, if you were looking at, you know, A556 weapons that can best handle steel case ammo. Now, this is cutting hairs because What's happened, we're at the farthest end, for instance, when I mentioned the 5.56, I, oh, everybody's gonna get pissed. Guys, when all of these 5.56 weapons are at the end, or the zenith, of their development processes, and all the bugs have been worked out of, there is absolutely no reason to dump the M16. The only reason to dump the M16 is they got it to work too well. You do realize that. I don't want to be the first person carrying one of these damn, you know, 6.8 rifles. Any of these SIG rifles? I don't want to be the first person carrying one of those. Why? Well, historically, everybody's always had a bitch about every new rifle we've ever fielded. Okay? And there are things that sometimes need to be adjusted with different weapons. Now, the Springfield is one of the few that actually, I would say just to reverse, Talking to World War I vets years ago when I was much younger, the Springfield had a following immediately. As soon as it came out, everybody said, damn, this is a good rifle. The only thing that shadowed it at all was the M1917 Enfield. When the M1917 Enfield came out, which was American made, but we made it as the P14 for the Brits, so we already had it tooled up, but it was originally intended for .30 out of six anyway. In its later trench form, it was the preferred rifle for a lot of the guys because with an internal hidden magazine, although some of them extend a little bit because the larger internal magazines are capable of holding up to 10 rounds. There was an eight round and a 10 round internal extension. You can't see it from the outside except if you have the 10 round, it actually pushes, well, push, but it sets the magazine base out a little farther by maybe 3-16th of an inch. But it is noticeable if you're looking to rifle, you're wondering, wow, why is the trigger guard off? Why is that doing that? However, the Garand, hey, they had to adjust a little bit. Garand pretty well had it right. However, there were people who argued against a semi-automatic weapon. When the M16, well, when the M14 came out, that had two thing problems. mostly because they tried to make every rifle a sniper rifle. I will repeat that the tolerance level of our machining processes were at their height, our zenith. It ended in 1968, 69, and we've been in krapu status ever since for most of our production. But at that point in time, the M14 literally could be built almost as a marksman sniper rifle for every man carrying it. The ability to reproduce and mimic gun after gun the same level of performance in terms of accuracy in building the weapon was there. But it wasn't with CNC. It's just that we had reached the qualified people operating the machinery. The tooling at its highest level of performance ever. and the machinery to get it done. Okay? That combination, we had the perfect storm of positive production there. Then we go into the M16 and throwing certain things out and because they didn't follow the guidelines of Stoner, we had a lot of people killed by the M16 E1 rifle just by using it. Not because it blew up, but because it didn't work. and everybody tries to gloss that over. Well, guess what? We're at the other end of that. There are very few, if any, AR-15s you're gonna pick up that don't work. And I will say again, just because it's got a big name on it doesn't mean anything to me anymore. It hasn't for a long time. Why? Well, I can reference back to the colts, and colt was supposed to be the top surfing edge forever. We had a couple of A2 colts. By God, I'll tell you what, they were horrors. Well, we eventually found out that it was when the foreigners got hold of Colt and the rest is history there. But at this point in time, there isn't a 5.56 rifle that doesn't work. Why? Because we've had so much of a development time with the combination of the propellant, bullet, and case. We have the science down with regard to the machining processes and can relate pretty much to everything. And we do have a very, very qualified and experienced wave of individuals who build these things and you're doing it every day. Guys, experience is everything. So to be quite honest, right now, I don't care if it's an Anderson or I don't care if it's a, we're in a, up this guy. Everybody goes, oh my God, you'd carry an Anderson? Yeah, throw me an Anderson, I'll carry it. Or you know DP, you know, they would make it your miss what it is In fact, if I didn't like it I can start changing out parts can't I I can take my Lego gun and do anything I want with that Now on the other hand we get into MB ours We have a different world but it overlaps into the same area of science the the by the way Let's not forget something and caller you asked about the FAO. Don't forget the STG 58 Which is the FAO Allah, you know, Austria and Germany And in either configuration, those guns, those FALs, had to meet the same specs to deal with steel case ammunition. Now they did say that the one was finicky when initially produced. They worked the tolerances out. And they got everything caliber did. Germans aren't stupid people and they didn't have much money just coming out of World War II. They had to make it work. And so don't forget that while the G3 became the standard or the icon rifle that everybody recognizes with the Germans, the FNFAO was also adopted by the Germans quite successfully, and they used it quite extensively and did not retire it for quite some time. The guns overlapped each other. And in fact, they still had garands in service in 30-06. Why? They were poor country people. We made them poor. We bobbed them, you know, a lot. And then the Israeli kosher mafia stole everything they could from the Germans. Including the toy factories, not just guns. But anyway, the big thing here with the HK is spare parts like everything else. A firing pin extractor, a ejector, but it also again goes right down to all the basic internals. You can pretty well, if you cherry pick... from all the different sources. And by the way, to include What a Country! Well, in California, What a Country! What a Country! Remember that old time? What a Country! What a Country dot com. Go over there. Look to see what they have, because cyclically they have some pretty good prices on AR parts once in a while. but also on HK junk. Stuff coming in that probably the Israelis have either carried away or have it in service or one of the render revolution companies came off of. Another one again with Apex gun parts. They have been getting a lot of unique stuff. Unfortunately, I would tell you beware because the unique HK stuff is special. So the prices are special. Oh my God. I'm not as excited about those. Go ahead, caller. Jump in there, please. Yeah, I'm not at a computer terminal or anything, but I think it was classic firearms. I could be wrong. They're offering several different varieties of AR-15, several different varieties as in manufacturers of AR-15. $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500, $500 classic firearms, the air 15 under $400. Take a look to see what they have over there in their sales for today. Bear Creek Arsenal and then we have mentioned that before. If you are going to do the AR 10 243 win buy one buy an upper if you can. That's that should be in your golf bag. We'll go with the air 15 so you get it. You're a golfer. Okay. I said I take my number. Give me a number three. Yeah. Oh, give me a wood. Give me a wood. Number one. There we go. Yeah. What do you think, sir? 7.62x51, they don't... Well, wait a minute. When was the last time I used the 243? Oh, it's been a little while, sir. Oh, I'll slap that 243 on the roof there and hand her over to me some. Hey, Mark. One other thing. Go ahead. Why not? You know, I found one manufacturer of AR-10 upper and 30-06. My question is, why do you think there's been a slow adoption of the AR-10 uppers in 36? Oh, well, I didn't know anybody was still... There was a company making years ago a manual, as a manually operated upper, which has done a problem. I mean, it's just like... The AR-15 is like the AR-10, and the AR-10 is like the AR-15. You could use the upper... of like a 50 cal upper with a standard lower, whatever model you want and cap the round. In this case, basically what they're doing is taking the A or 10 lower and using that for the foundation purely for the trigger and the hammer for activating it on six rounds. So it's, wouldn't be cool, but somebody would have to make it and it's too late now. If somebody had wanted to do it, Maybe they did. I think two companies were looking at all kinds of optics ideas. But way back in the 80s, taking an AR-10 and making an AR-10 and 30 out of 6. Now, that idea was pulled through in a couple other different ways, there's other projects that these guys did. One was in Missouri, the other one was way out in, I want to say, Nevada. But it's just a preference thing. It's a cool idea. I mean, like I said, it's not a golf club idea. It'd be like, hey, you know, put the, yeah, put the out six on the roof. Because if you have those, if you had, think about it with an AR 10. Okay. What can we do with an AR 10 right now? Well, we know that we can do all kinds of Wildcats. You got a bunch of different large caliber, including the 6.8 government now, which is the two sub, what is it? Two seven, seven, whatever. You got 762x51 NATO. You've already got the new 243, which has been around now for a little bit, it's not new. Making any of the other calibers or chambers like that, larger calibers. The only thing is that it wouldn't be semi-automatic unless you open up the magazine well, which is what they were talking about doing back in the 80s, is building a taffied AR-10 receiver that would accept BAR mags. Now, the only thing about that is, remember is how the BAR mag is fixed to the gun and while you could do it, it's just like many of the other adapted magazine ideas, it would have been something to watch. They'd have been able to figure it out. The big thing is that back in the day, it used to be BAR mags for less than $2 a piece. One time they were 50 cents and they went to a dollar, then they hovered at $2 for probably 20 years. Because nobody had any BAR's but there were billions of BAR mags. For that reason a lot of other extended mags for other 30 out of 6 guns were built based on the BAR magazine. They'd use the BAR mag and modify it. Now that would have been the logical magazine and the only magazine to possibly use to make a semi-automatic AR-10 and .30-06. I would have a problem with it. I think it would be a good idea. It would be cool. One of the reasons is again, that buffer system is going to take a lot of the thud out of using the rifle because most people are fearful of pulling the trigger on an .06 and they shouldn't. Again, because of the buffer system, felt recoil would be that much less and would make it a very, very stable platform in 30-06. It would still have more recoil than the 760 by 51 NATO, but not much. And I think it would have been a good idea. It would have been an interesting idea, but once 760 by 51 NATO was standardized on, then already the 0-06 was Surely a surplus inventory weapon is the thing. Hey Mark. There are a couple of rifles after World War II that were built not six. And everything else goes into the NATO range. Go ahead, jump in there, caller. Hey, changing the subject again. Sorry if you needed to go back. Just something I was curious about. So... You know how the SKS and the AK kind of go hand in hand as one of them was just the cheaper variant of the other that was easier to pass out and simpler? Well, I was thinking about it and I know that the SKS in today's world really, you know, I mean it works it does but it's kind of lost its edge but for a future reference, you know for anything we would build it made me think If we had a service weapon, you know, maybe a battle rifle, would it be worth it to also have a simpler weapon that, you know, was maybe a half of the cost? You know, let's say you had an M14. And then you had an SKS-styled internal magazine stripper-kit-loaded rifle chambered in .308 that held, you know, five to ten rounds. But it was maybe a half or three quarters the cost or so. Would that be worth it, or would it be too much to do? Actually, there was a whole series of Volksrum-type weapons, and they aren't just Volksrum. The Germans, after World War II, looked at a number of different projects which worked. but they were less sophisticated. Most of those were extensions of the VG44 and VG45 light rifles, which used the 8mm Kurz round. Those are tubular stock. Basically, those guns are the Sten gun of the assault family. They're more sophisticated in two ways because of the gas system. But there were other solutions including a couple of designs and as I mentioned this many times if you go to Aberdeen Proving Ground history We developed a couple of weapons like that In fact by the end of the of the 50s if you look up the pause PA WS rifle pause the pause rifle system and several other sister programs were designed around the idea of making a weapon in a post-nuclear war environment. Here's what they found out. They can build a stable equal to the M14 or M16 in performance weapon. But the problem is they can buy, you can build maybe nine or 10 of them for the price of either one, and they work just as well. The one project rifle used, a 5.56. Air 15 M16 magazine. But they also built the same design using the M14 magazine. And they found that both of them work. The interesting thing is they used a side magazine feed, kind of like a stent idea, but they used a side magazine feed typical of some of the other stoner designs. They were done with tubular stock or with square stock material because they were designed to be built either way. In other words, if it's post-World War III and the bombs have dropped and you're trying to get production up, you need a weapon that you can build cheap and get into people's hands quickly so that you can get ready for the Chinese hordes coming on, landing on the beaches, or the Russians, or whoever else would show up. And the interesting thing is that these designs work flawlessly, and then they were made to disappear because they didn't want to give anybody ideas. Most of, there are so many weapons out there that are so much simpler than everything we're carrying, but they work. It's just a matter of applying the right round to go along, especially, you know, again, since we can be quite selective, choosing the round that best fits your logistics needs. I'll tell you what, the Shashaw, World War I, squad gun, which was the counterpart to the BAR. It was French. originally an 8mm Lebel, the design was made by the French and it was crude. Okay, I mean it's a stand gun of the light squad guns. But properly constructed and not done with French saboteurs mucking up the design, which it's argued that's exactly what happened, and certain things being changed. The example is the magazine. If you take this you show and you build it in 7.62x51 NATO, That gun runs like a Singer sewing machine. If you look at the cup pressures, chamber performance of the 8mm Labelle, which is what it was originally designed in, that is a very powerful cartridge. It's a Coke bottle cartridge so that it breaks free easily. Chamber release is efficient, like with the 7.62x54R cartridge. A rifle, or a squad gun, could be built in the exact pattern of the issue show. and also used to be known as a shih tzu or shit shit. The guys probably gave it a bunch of derogatory names. The weapon itself would work. It's just a matter of chambering and scaling it accordingly. Example that the shih tzu, that gun can be built as a squad gun in 556. And you could use the modern 50 round and 75 round AR mags that we presently build. Use an AR-15 magazine well for your feed, that type of design. And you could do it in steel, cast aluminum for the magazine well. You can do all kinds of jump. You could do it in dissimilar metals. It's designed to be, again, a last ditch gun. It's designed to be a utility gun. And so it could fill the gap more efficiently than any other weapon. In submachine guns, the Sten gun still makes the most sense. That would be also another solution for a light carbine you can hand out to everyone. And nobody wants to talk about that. Bottom line is, all the other weapons we're seeing right now are pricey. Well, imagine building a gun that originally was built for $2.75 per gun during World War II at peak production. That was the Sten Mark II. Now, you can take that design, use a Glock magazine well, tapered magazine well, thick to the side, just like on the original Sten, and you would adopt that gun with Glock magazines. Why? Because there's more Glocks on the stinking planet than anywhere, and we're already doing it with the AR-15. Basically, they're doing the same thing. with the AR-15 designs you all see out there that are at 9mm or .40 caliber. They're using Glock mags in a, what is it, pistol magazine lower AR-15. That's why that for the moment is more efficient because once again, we're at the zenith of our design idea with the light rifle in the AR-15 category. That's why it was so easy for the engineers and everybody to tweak out doing what we just described, which is instead of taking the Uzi mag, which is what originally Colt was doing for the Colt carbine, they were using the standard Uzi magazine because that was dominant. Well, guess what? The world has changed. Uzi's way back in the taillights. But guess what's right out there in front of everyone? The Glock pistol. In a subordinate or alternate main battle rifle, there'd be a couple of options. But you could even go so far as to say that just a standard scout rifle of any kind would do the kind of work you're talking about. A scout light rifle, no, scout MDR, but it'd be a main battle rifle, but it would be in a smaller, lighter, less frills package. And that's something that could be done. The biggest argument is... Materials available. Can you do aluminum? Can you do steel? If you don't have much, steel tubing is still your cheapest first solution for 99% of what you've got to do to build a lot of guns. And it does not. When I say tubing, it doesn't have to be circular, guys. Remember, they make square tubing, and that really is an advantage. Something to think about good jump in their color. Yes, still me the one thing I like about the SKS if I understand the philosophy correctly Was it was basically a one gun package? You needed a bayonet bayonet was attached to the weapon needed a magazine magazine was fixed inside the weapon you needed a cleaning kit I'm pretty sure the sock was hollow for a cleaning kit if I'm wrong, correct me But it was everything was onboard. Yeah. Yeah, the idea is you don't need mags to run it, you know? I mean, you know, if you have loose rounds in this weapon, you can fight. And that's what I love about the concept of the SKS. But I feel like if it was scaled into like a Lee-Enfield design or something like that, semi-auto for .308, it would be a really good weapon, you know? As long as you've got loose rounds or stripper clips, you can load it, you know? And exchangeable magazines would be optional. Maybe have the same magazine well as whatever main battle rifle you have, but it has an internal fixed magazine factory so you don't need it. You know, I feel that would be a very good design that probably would only cost half as much as whatever contemporary design would fill the main service weapon role. I just think that that would be a good idea. You know, hand somebody a weapon and some ammo and they're good to go. They've got everything they need. Well, the SKS, number one, if we were looking at CNC, CNC would eliminate most of your heartburn with regard to the receiver. That's the big issue, is the receiver is obviously the heart of that weapon. The Chinese were doing it with far-cruder technology than everything we have, and I can't believe someone couldn't crank out an SKS for a pretty decent price. In fact, what would really be fun is for them to actually make it in 5.56. There was a discussion about doing that years ago, but it was superfluous because you know when you're buying an SKS for $56 or even later when they were $150 you can't make it for $150 so it negated the idea. Now I'm not talking about charging $6,700 for this gun. I'm saying that if you were to if you were to make it a basic utility gun exactly as intended same ideas The weapon would work just as well and I think the price can probably be kept down well below $100 production. Barrel would be the big issue. The only thing that's the issue is the barrel guys. Everything else is, you know, it has already been perfected and off the shelf. Let me give an example. I wouldn't have to build stocks. If I were building the gun right now, if I wanted to make a bunch of SKS's, which to a degree somebody is. But if I wanted to build them, there's two things we know. Number one, we can pin the barrel. Well, how do we know that? Well, because the Chinese and the Russians both did that. Chinese did it as, you know, a policy after a while. They just said, well, hell with it. Why? We'll eliminate the sheeting process in a screw work. What we'll do is instead straight, straight rear shaft and install the barrel and line it up with a jig and run a A drill through the side of the receiver, pull that back out, hammer an oversized pin into place, the barrel doesn't go anywhere. So that's a crude rue, but it works every time and half of the SKS's that you guys have out there are pinned receivers. Have you had any fail? I've never seen any of them fail. So right off the bat, there's a major simplification in the receiver barrel melding process. Now the AR is just about as, you know what the difference is between the AR and the AR, and that idea with the SCAS? The AR 15 made it so it can be torqued off with tools. With the SCAS, their logic was, hammer it in and when you need to, hammer it out. Here's the difference. But basically the AR-15's barrel installs in much the same way if you look at how it just has a retaining cap and all the other fixtures in place, which are all straightforward, to lock that barrel into place and that's a big plus. So the other thing is off the shelf parts for most of the accoutrements. Example, there's a dozen different companies that have made SKS stocks. I guarantee that the molds are still out there, nobody threw anything away. So the main company, where are the top of the agreement? The figure walked in through the mist with a flintlock in his hand. His clothes were torn and dirty as he stood there by my bed. He took off his three-cornered hat and speaking low to me, he said, we fought a revolution to secure our liberty. We wrote the Constitution as a shield from tyranny. For future generations, this legacy we gave. In this, the land of the free and home of the brave. The freedoms we secured for you, we hoped you'd always keep. But tyrants labored endlessly while your parents were asleep. Your freedom's gone, your courage lost, you're no more than a slave. In this, the land of the free, home of the brave. You buy permits to travel and permits to own a gun. permits to start a business or to build a place for one. On land that you believe you own, you pay a yearly rent. Although you have no voice in saying how the money's spent. Your children must attend a school that doesn't educate. And your Christian values can't be taught according to the state. You read about the current news in a regulated press. And you pay a tax you do not owe to please the IRS. Your money is no longer made of silver nor of gold. You trade your wealth for paper so your life can be controlled. You pay for crimes that make our nation turn from God and shame. Number, you trade it in your name. You've given government control to those who do you harm so they could burn down churches and seize the family farm. and keep our country deep in debt. Put men of God in jail. Harash your fellow countrymen while corrupted courts prevail. Your public servants don't uphold the solemn oaths they've sworn. And your daughters visit doctors so their children won't be born. Your leaders send artillery and guns to foreign shores and send your sons to slaughter fighting other people's wars. Can you regain the freedoms for which we fought and died? Or don't you have the courage or the faith to stand with pride? And are there no more values for which you'll fight to save? Or do you wish your children to live in fear and be a slave? O sons of the Republic, arise, take a stand, defend the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the land, preserve our great Republic and each God given right, and pray to God to keep the torch of freedom burning bright. As I awoke he'd vanished in the mist from whence he came. His words were true. We are not free, but we have ourselves to blame. For even now as tyrants trample each god-given right, we only watch him tremble, too afraid to stand and fight. If he stood by your bedside in a dream while you were asleep and wondered what remains of the freedoms he'd fought to keep, what would be your answer if he called out from the grave? hour of the afternoon intelligence reports have our currency. One day closer to victory for all of our brothers and sisters both on and behind the lines in occupied territories southwest west northeast and south. Ladies and gentlemen you're listening to us on www.libertytreeradio.4mg.com LibertyTreeRadio.org we're also on satellite once I hide all of our merchant ring out there across all of the Oceans of the globe and we're on a myriad of communications technologies both inside and outside these United States. It is Weapons Wednesday. It is the 13th of July. Oh no. The 13th. Wednesday. It's... Oh it means nothing. Anyway, it's Wednesday the 13th. No way. Yes way. It is the 14th year though of open and... an obvious Fabian Socialist and Soviet Socialist occupation of America with the K 2022 old earth calendar 2022 battle for the Republic the dance of sorts and we were talking about alternates I would remind everybody this really cool designs out there not you didn't necessarily everybody's first choice but let's remember that even the Marine Corps looked at the Bushmaster bullpup not the Bushmaster AR-15 Bushmaster rifle with Bushmaster designs. The original, to be quite honest, the original Bushmaster 5.56 rifle would be an excellent production choice in this day and age. Why? Soon see. The advantages of what we now know and what we had in the way of a simplified design, if you go look at the original Bushmaster 5.56 rifle, it is a beaver board stock. with a steel and or later aluminum receiver depending upon what year was made. Okay. It originally was a top eject but it also was built inside eject. It used as many critical air 15 M16 parts as possible. So the pistol grip, that's an external furniture thing. The buttstock is specific to the design. The gas system is relatively straightforward, in fact very simple. It is in that respect kind of an AK kind of system, but it was in 5.56. Using AR-15 Max uses a standard AR-15 connect, so it does not require any special adaption, adaptive process for the magazines adaptation. What was neat is conventional, simple sight, front and rear iron. And they made it both in the folding stock model, they made a thick stock which was the cheapest and usually what we tried to get people to buy. And again, they also made the Bushmaster pistol. It was advertised in all kinds of magazines. You had the guy hanging out the side of the aircraft with the crew chiefs, you know, basically look like a crew chief on a Huey with one of the Bushmaster pistols, you know, lit resting on his forearm and mag, you know, the magazine obviously being emptied with four or five rounds in the air and was advertised as the most powerful handgun in the world, not the Dirty Harry Model 29. Bushmaster pistol in 5.56. The original, of course, was the pistol was an ambidextrous gun. It had a pivoting pistol grip and assembly so that you could lay it in your right arm and rest it on the back of the weapon, rest it on your forearm, and you could fire it that way as an offhand weapon, or you could shift it over to your left hand and make no difference. And it was a top inject system. If you were to look at that design right now, or the original Bushmaster design, that could be made faster than any AR-15. The advantage, all critical AR-15 internal parts are integratable. They're already there. So the advantage of this was for firing pin extractor, bolt, other external furniture parts, is AR-15 could be slapped down. Today, Probably rather than even going to be reborn stock which actually is what I would do still maybe anyway for price cost It's so cheap nowadays to do a polymer folding buttstock on something that because again the air 15 and we're at the Zenith of our air 15 production in the US which is why they're trying to stop it and why they have to change rifles because we've perfected it. We've got it working so well, we're not going to have people probably dying from operating the gun. They may, for lack of working knowledge with the weapon, or, you know, ineptness with regard to marksmanship, but not because the weapon's going to fail them. Those days have gone, okay? But changing out to a new rifle, God, I wouldn't want one of these new 6.8 government rifles and getting into a bad situation, especially the latest production run, or the first one. God help you. But the Bushmaster would be an option. Go take a look at the original Bushmaster rifles in 5.56. By the way, they even talked about building it in 7.62 by 39, but I don't know if they ever did. I can't recall that they did. But back in the day, they actually were proposing building the Bushmaster rifle in other calibers. Well, the only other calibers out there were either 7.62x39 or 8mm Kurz. So it's an interesting solution. Well, later on, Bushmaster came up with another idea, which is the Bushmaster bullpup rifle. And the Marine Corps bought 2,000 of them for evaluation with the Marines. And they were actually looking at purchasing it. What's the advantage of the Bushmaster bullpup design? It's using a door closure extruded body for the receiver. Literally it works in the drawer. The one panel slides off and everything works in a drawer. The thing is so stupid simple to build, it's ridiculous. It was a tremendous profit weapon for, if they had adopted it, it would have been a very profitable weapon for whoever got a chance to build it. The contractor would have been, would have been Bushmaster. But what's interesting about the design, and if you think I'm joking about this, I've been in a lot of different engineering environments. And I recognize the extruded metal box that they used right away the frame. It's interesting. But otherwise, standard link barrel, flash hider, internals are all AR-15 again. wherever possible, so especially the critical working parts, why change when something works well? But also because of integrated spare parts systems. So since the AR-15 is coming to play, a myriad of other weapons have developed, but the basic critical components for wear and tear have been AR-15M16, which is good. which means that you're not going to park the weapon over in the corner of the grass hut because you don't have any spare parts for it. If something gets battle-blown, something gets hit, something gets broken, something gets worn out, you don't throw it away. It becomes either, again, the second line weapon, or you use it as a hanger. Queens start stealing parts off it for the armor. And so that's, again, it's something that can be well-maintained. Now, both of these guns would be an excellent light rifle solution. and yet still allow for all of the other ideas that everybody's come to accept or expect, especially with volume fire, which is, for instance, the detachable magazine. And in this case, both guns, both the Bushmaster designs, use a standard AR-15 mag with a standard AR-15 latch system. So guess what? It's fully understandable and easy to relate to, which is a really important part about training your troops and being able to get them to relate to the weapon they're carrying. Okay? Now... There would be one other gun out there and it was made in South America and also made in the Caribbean in the 60s. And if you look, I think the Dominican Republic built it. They at least were looking at it and it again is a tubular receiver, steel construction, very crude, very rude, very workable gun. And originally they did a variation on the idea of the design in 30 carbine. Later on they took the exact same design and adapted it to 556 and it worked. Now Dominican Republic is not a real rich country, okay? They do have machining capabilities, but they're not grandiose. So understand that if they were able to build this and it was an indigenous design, then kiss, keep it simple stupid was the policy. There would be no more working parts and absolutely necessary. The issue is being able to have an example which you could probably find in somebody's arsenal and then specking everything out that you need from there. It's like go ahead call or jump in there. Yeah, I tracked down that 30-06 rifle. They call it the B as in boy and Nancy. 3-6 as X-ray 3 long range The calibers they build it in are 270, 25-06, and 30-06. Cost near three grand though to buy one. And so I'd send that your way, but yeah, it'd be pretty interesting. Is there really much of a trade-off between the 30-06 blowing up concrete, six inches of concrete, and that 3L8? Well, the OTSIX has got more potential. And sadly enough, the biggest problem is, as we've said before, they never built as many unique or specialized rounds for the 7.6U by 51 NATO. The OTSIX AP is, in and of itself, just a big step up. But the OTSIX is more powerful in general. Plus, we can also load it up if we needed to. And custom-loaded with different projectiles, but we do the same thing with the 7.62x51 NATO, as far as the bullets go. We can build our own. The- Oh, hey, Mark. I didn't see this. They also manufactured a 300 Winchester mag and 7mm Remington mag. The BN36X3 long range was driven by the thought of recreating the M1 Durand. and revamping it into an AR style rifle. The dream was brought to life by Norine in 2012 with early prototypes. The BN36 on the market today is a refined model of the original version and will meet and exceed your expectations. Back to you. Wait a minute. Is it just the upper receiver or is it the whole gun? Why is it the whole rifle? Okay, what magazine are they using? I haven't figured that one out yet. Proprietary magazine? I'm looking, I'm looking. Well, that's okay. The 270 and 20... Magazine, 20 round, uh, still aren't telling me what kind of magazine it is. Well, they sell the magazines for $145 apiece. Well, hold on, okay, hold on. Excuse me. Basically what they're doing is this why I had this conversation with four of the different 50 caliber manufacturers about hey, why not scale down one of your weapons your upper receivers and build it whatever caliber he seems to float your boat and The argument was with one of them. Well, it would cost me as much to build a smaller caliber AR upper bolt gun than it would be to do a 50 which I believe is BS number one. Just one making the effort. He's not exactly, they weren't motivated, okay? But what I'm curious about this is, see, if 270 to 25 out of six and 30 out of six could use BAR mags, the BAR mags are expensive by comparison to what they used to be. I don't know what the average price is right now. But where it might cost $145 is you start getting the 300 wind and 7mm mag, 7mm Remington mag. That's a beastie boy. And so again, I can see that would be specialized. However, is there an image? Can you see what it actually has to say? Oh yeah, there's an image. Yes, there is an image. What do you want me to tell you? Well, I was just curious it's using basically it's just a stretched out air air 10 receiver, right? I mean looks like an air I do believe so I you know It's the one I first went across this man and I seen the price, you know, like I shuffled this back in the file when cabinet somewhere and only thought about talking saying something about today Go ahead. Well, before we go any farther, I'm going to correct you on that. The US government spending $3,600 on one punk junk rifle for every man. I think you could easily spend $3,000 and end up with a performance rifle. Well, no, it'll do more than anything they're doing. I agree with you there. Anyway, if I may, I'll give you the web address. Yes. It is only N-L-Y, long, L-O-N-G, range, R-A-N-G-E. And that's all lowercase. And then I'm certain that once you get there, you'll find, let's see, it's called Doreen Firearms, is the website. From their home page you can find just what they have there. Thank you. You're welcome. That's all I have for right now, Mark. Alright? God bless. Yeah, you know what? To be quite honest, if it was a choice between the SIG and buying one of these, I'd have more fun buying one. In fact, especially in 30-odd SIGs. In op SIGs, although again, guys, if you like Belted Magnum, the fact that they built an AR type platform weapon and 300 wind mag or a 7mm Remington mag, you know, they considered this. The big, how many remember this? Because you know, they've actually gone off on a tangent with .338 Lapua now. But remember, for the longest time, the US military, if you were a marksman, you had an option between going with a 7.62x51 NATO rifle or You went with a 300 wind mag. And as I pointed out, if you pay attention in equipping part two, look at the nomenclature on the side of the ammo cans. Remember when we did equipping, that's been quite a few years ago. Those cans came, that ammunition was right from the first production run for the DOD. Comment. Go ahead. And it was 300 wind, and I'll tell you what, guess what kids, they're still floating around out there. So good choice. Go ahead, jump in their corner. Yeah, Mark. I remember seeing it was two or three, maybe four years ago in Shotgun News, a whole page ad showing what looked like an AR but enlisted in 338 Lopua. So somebody is, must have been playing around with this idea for quite a while. It looks interesting but expensive. Too much for me at the time. That's all out. Well that makes sense in this same company because if you're a 300 one mag dialing up to 338 isn't that much, that's not much deeper. Okay so the big issue in each one of these the biggest problem is A, cost of the mag, the razor, it's the blades. But the other thing here is also is reliability. I assume if you're spending that much money in mag they better work out the bugs. That's all there is to it. But the idea that you can get it in one of the heavier calibers like that, remember that the buffer system on the AR is the big selling feature for size of soldier. Again, there are two rifles that the ARVN likes. You can look at the average size of the Vietnamese soldier in the field. Okay, one was the again the M1 carbine that sold without any problem anywhere in Vietnam. The other one was the M16 when it finally became available in good numbers because again for the size of the soldier felt recoil performance in general, weight of the weapon, all those were plus features for the ally that we were supporting. In many cases 100 pounds soaking wet. The although don't forget we did give them garands and vars to carry Okay, Vietnam. They basically were carrying the US World War two inventory of weapons initially And so they had the carbine the grand the m3 grease gun you know both forms and they had the var in service Which for some poor little guy that would be a quarter of the man's weight just for the gun I don't know who would be schlepping that. In fact, if I were smart, I'd have two men on that rifle if they were that much smaller. I don't care how well-built you are. That's a beast of a gun for a person that's smaller to carry. Anyway, probably the same source. Again, Noreen, the 338 Lapua in an AR platform. The big thing is looking for affordability. I guess government threw that out the window, $3,600 for a rifle. So what the hell? I mean, it used to be... Well, again, the idea was to make it affordable for war production purposes. This is like everything else we're seeing in the collapsing days of betrayal. The outrageous cost guarantees that there won't be the weapons there when they're needed. Was it the Grumwold? The Navy destroyer, stealth destroyer? Just... something one of you guys said I watched and the main main ordinance on the roof as I said yesterday is the main turrets they can't buy ammunition they bought test ammo 90 rounds why well because it's a combination missile launcher slash artillery piece oh it'll and it reaches a hundred miles well to put a full magazine of ammunition on board that ship 2,000 rounds is almost 2 billion dollars. And that's perishable. That's stuff that gets fired and forgotten. You know, it's gone. You don't get anything back with more material anyway. But there's no inexpensive solution for other options. It's either big boom toy or nothing. So they're, and again, they were going to build what, 20 or whatever, they're going to build, they built three and they're not going to build anymore because they can't afford because of cost overruns. So you have three. Well, what happens if you destroy those three? Well, then you have none. And three doesn't take long to sink. Not with saturation fire from land-based and air-based operations. So if you notice what's happening with the numbers, The other reason World War III will last 53 minutes is because after everybody does all their speedy exchange work, everybody's going to step back and go away and got nothing left to shoot. We might start building something else and getting ready for war, other than the fact that they've killed a bunch of people up for the Georgia Guidestones of Jim. A couple of things here real quick. And again, while we... The one neat thing, Bushmaster rifles, we're talking about AR-15 parts. Guys, right now the AR-15 is... the go-to weapon for most of your work. Doesn't mean we get rid of the AKs and SKSs. There was a point where you could buy three of the AKs for the price of one AR-15 in terms of kits and put a couple of decent guns together and have a spare tucked away in a tube somewhere. AKs have now moved up into the elevated price range of basically the MBR rifles. There are some fantastic AKs out there. They are incredibly reliable despite all the, you know, remish, mish about, they're really reliable. Well, I've seen AKs do things that none of the other guns will do and run in every condition that you really can imagine, including some really sick looking weapons that were horribly abused. And yet they still internally look like they just came from the factory. So, but the AR is the solution for the moment. Other than that, manually operated weapons, the surplus bolt guns used to be, again, the poison they got was the last of that line. Now, it is more affordable to go with a lower end, standard, American made, manually operated rifle if you want to build up a bolt gun. And again, the good thing is this, if you bought a big crate of those Mosin Nagants, then you got yourself some money sitting there, don't you? If you put one of them out for sale or two, you pay for the crate, but you can't replace them. The other thing to remember is we have a vast inventory of those. So this is why, again, don't negate the SKS. The problem is just that we're seeing an ad hoc random wave of the SKS's come in from third party countries, mostly probably like, again, eastern African states, the Pacific Rim. and the Pacific Island states. They have a lot of SKS's and AK's that they purchased or that were gifted by the Chinese. In turn, those weapons have been cycled out as newer weapons being provided by the Chinese or somebody else are replacing them to a degree. They're looking for lucre slash cash and that's why those guns have come out on the render revolution market. Now, be quite honest, as I've said a million times, I wouldn't hesitate to carry an SKS and you will see me at some time with an SKS running around as you have in the past because it works. It simply works. It's not obsolete. And hits count, misses don't. And the big thing I see with most of our problem right now is the reason we're having a problem, we're going to have a problem with consumables is because of, let's just say very, it's kind of like having a lead foot car in gasoline. Well, a twitchy finger that's a little too twitchy and isn't focusing on actually aiming creates a bit of a problem. For that reason, that's where the training comes in now, something we need to emphasize. Now, before we're pretty far there, we didn't do it the last hour, but we are going to do it this hour. It's probably got it on standby, our traditional bottom of the hour. Hey! This is my rifle! There are many like it, but this one is mine! Eiffel is my best friend! I'm useless! Eiffel true! He was trying to kiss you to me! Before God! In our hands we'll prove no trifle You may ride a good lead speed You may know us, turn the master You forward march with speed But you'll learn the back much faster When you meet our mountain boys And they'll lead your journey start Glad you make what little noise And always hit the mark Hold the rifle, hold the rifle In our hands we'll prove no trifle Maggie no graves at home, back across the briney water A giddy must come, lags, well it's to the slaughter But if we the job must do, then the sooner it is begun If Clinton's bigger, hold him up, too, the quicker it will be done Hold the rifle, hold the rifle In our hands, no proof, no true rifle Hold the rifle, hold the rifle In our hands, no proof, no true rifle questions were asked about, you know, like, well, is there something else? This is why we talk about things like this. Hopefully somebody else would plant a seed. Maybe there's something you have on the shelf that makes you go, huh? And you open a book or you might go and look at something you inherited from grandpa or dad. We don't all need to know about those things, but you might understand better when you take a look at the physical object about how things can be made differently. During the 60s, a lot of unique ideas and innovations were followed through on. That was truly an age of research and development to the extreme, and part of it was stuff stolen from Germany. Part of it were new ideas or ideas that were part of the seven black books of ordinance. We're just mix and match and let's see if we can make this work better now that we have better machining technologies or whatever. But I mentioned, for instance, like the PAWS program and a couple of the others were out there. Those were going in the other direction of simplification based upon necessity. But rather than waiting until you're in the bad situation, the idea was to give people a problem and have them come up with a solution. With the pause and a couple of these others, for instance, the M60 machine that had just come out, the whole M60 lower trigger assembly was used for the weapon for fire control. The whole thing was designed to be a mish-mish brought together from what you might have available off the shelf that was readily available and reasonably priced or already paid for and build me a gun. And the design worked very, very well. It was not anything to brag about as far as the way it looked. Just a straightforward like square box tube. with a pistol grip hanging out the bottom, a magazine well on the side, left side of the gun, ejection port on the right, and a simple charging handle, a very simple bolt, and the idea was that it was pop, pop, pop, boom, boom, boom, and it was in 5.56. Now, the other weapons that were out there at the time were comparable weapons that were part of the similar programs, also included the Flechette guns. Now, Fluschette had its day and just kind of disappeared again, but it comes and goes. Every once in a while somebody has probably a new name for it. They'll try to come up with some BS new name to make it sound more impressive. But basically it's a discarding sable Fluschette round. Very, very light. It could be done in any number of different materials. They experimented with tungsten. They also experimented with titanium. Both worked, both are expensive by comparison, but both end up with a very desirable penetration results, especially with a hyper-ballistic velocity round. Both tungsten carbide and titanium can handle extreme heat. And one of the problems with doing 5,000 feet per second or more is that just air friction melts material in flight. With the Fluschet round the idea was that you went with a high velocity ultra light round that basically Was in a large volume fire weapon system And the idea behind this is that, depending upon how small you made the round and how, because the fluschett itself is no bigger than the actual fluschettes of the type that you see in a beehive round for artillery, although there were bigger fluschettes that were built. The idea is that you have a very, very small case. You can put a lot of rounds into the magazine and you go with select fire or a three-round burst and basically the stuff, the things traveling so hot, so fast, that it virtually tissue explodes. material, the virtually tedious turn to cotton candy. It is argued that when they did the tissue test, that's exactly what the objective target looked like. They used a piece of beef. This is one of the many tests, not frozen. They use that for the chicken test going through plain windshields. But it literally in 600 to 700 rounds per minute, though the high cyclic rate was 1,300 rounds per minute or more depending on which gun was tested. And with this very light round and multiple hits on target, it literally turned the tissue to cotton candy. Look like... A million tiny little flaming arrows. Yeah, exactly. One after another after another after another. It's almost like a minigun almost. But they say the... Testing was done at Aberdeen Perving Ground. Research originally was done at Frankfurt Arsenal. And the idea was interesting. Penetration though, because of the lightweight nature of the round, is limited. And again, you could build the same idea bigger and better. In fact, we already have seen this with discarding SABO in 30-06 and 308. Many of the 30 caliber other 30 caliber rounds that were Remington bought the Sabo cup design that some of you may be familiar with But this predates that although the idea goes back many many years Sabo discarding Sabo is not new Sabo okay, but the or or Sabbath okay, son That's a Sabbath round and don't argue with the sergeant that tells you it's a Sabbath round. Okay, even though it's a simple Yes, that could be Christ with even with you. It's simple or Dutch. It's a simple if it's Dutch too. But anyway, fact is that the in this hyper dart they could stack the magazines I believe were 80 and 120 and even 150 round Kind of like the MP. Oh, is it the mp7 where you're using the new, you know the five seven round for your primary case. You can stuff a lot more rounds into a smaller space, which is what they do. It's not quite the same effect, but it's moving in that direction. You should see the 5.7 in that configuration is moving in that direction. The difference is velocities, energy and cup pressures were not an issue with the design. But also barrel wear was another thing, but because it's a Sabo the type of Sabo originally tested was a polymer, but it was a It's the term for it it's actually almost metallic, but then they also did do aluminum It's an aluminum ensconce to Sabo The Sabo itself being whatever high metal was chosen The SABO is designed to peel off once it leaves the muzzle. And because of the velocities, trust me, it peeled off. In fact, it was probably liquefied partially around the shaft of the penetrator almost as quickly as it was leaving the barrel. So it was very easily sloughed off of the round. The only other thing about the SABO, although they could get shots about to 600 to 700 yards, With the gun Reliability with regard to in point of impact with varied for obvious reasons a very very light projectile But it could achieve that distance by the nature of the energy behind the round and the velocities that you're we're discussing at 5,000 plus feet per second What's interesting as I pointed out your there's no time on target. There's no leading it. It's like a laser gun So the one thing about it, at short to intermediate range, the round was quite devastating and relatively easy for the operators to manipulate. The weapon itself was pretty useful. The only thing is the amount of ammunition consumed and the fact, let's not forget, government doesn't like to spend money except for now. Now we'd buy 10 of these rifles and buy 10 rounds of ammunition for each gun. Probably a little more, but not much. But anyway, back in the day, you got to remember, titanium or, again, carbide, or tungsten, forgive me, tungsten. Tungsten is used for machining processes. These are tooling metals. Titanium not so much, but obviously it's still a very, very useful and very durable metal. Titanium is used for aircraft turbine blades for a reason. So in these types of missions, a minuscule amount of material by comparison is actually a reasonable trade-off in Perino cost for performance. However, the program's pretty well we're allowed to fade in favor of conventional rounds as we can all see in this day and age. And the 5.56, one out over everything, along with 7.62 by 51 NATO, that's where we need to stick. But the idea of building something like that in a single shotgun, a single shot weapon, at the velocities we're talking about with a tungsten carbide or with a titanium shaft, Guys, I don't think there's any body armor you could wear that would stop that. There's no body armor you could buy that would stop that route. It would not be incredibly devastating. Well, plus or minus on that one. But it depends on how many multiple hits. And remember the shock trauma issue by itself, even if you get tagged in the arm and maybe a tag in the chest and maybe one on the upper leg. the amount of damage that the projectile does when it pitches and yaws through the objective, pretty impressive. However, the issue would be if it's going through either ceramic or laminate Kevlar or if it's going through steel, then what happens to the round once, if it penetrates? It may or may not. Most likely it would. It's how much energy would be left after it plows through the ballistic armor. All armor is good. By the way, as soon as you say this, people, well, why wear body armor? Well, because all armor is good. It's not bulletproof. It's bullet resistant. And it's not all the shots that might get through. It's the other ones that you stop that count. You know, if it stops at once, if it stopped one bullet from plowing through your chest, then it's worth carrying, isn't it? I think so. Maybe it didn't stop the other three after that, but if it does one it paid for itself It did what it was supposed to do it did it to the best of its ability So but here again, that was one of the arguments about whatever you get into the argument about body armor Then you have the same problem. Well, but I could use this well, it's like tanks and APCs If it's got tracks and it's got a turret that doesn't mean it's a tank an MBT a main battle tank It means it's an armored vehicle And they always play this game where they build a new armored vehicle and then they tell you, well, we didn't support the troops. We didn't build it right like the Humvee. The Humvee was never meant to be an armored vehicle. It was meant to be a replacement for the 1514 Mutt Jeep and the soft skin standard five quarter ton weapons carrier. Was not meant to be an armored car wasn't meant to be a tank wasn't meant to it was meant to carry weapons And then run like hell shoot scoot and try not to be shot. Here's the problem. It's too stinking wide Shooting and scoot name as easy as it should be and the vehicle replaced was what well three times the size It's three times the size of what it replaced at least I'm probably closer to five Making it a much easier more jolly target to hit air go then they decided we need to arm it to save the troops While you're applying it into a mission that there were again This is why right now like we're talking about the Navy with what they're buying in the way ships and the pummel screws are doing there and the other problems we see with the pecker woods that are getting paid off with brown envelopes and all of the DoD during a semi peacetime environment With all the rest of the mechanized equipment guys, it's Not what you think as you see in the movies and each vehicle has a vehicle mission statement what it's supposed to do and Every one of these vehicles has followed the you know conform to the parameters laid down Now whether it was a perfect vehicle. Well, that seems like for a long time. We've never had anything perfect But then again man never makes anything that is perfect But in this case with regard to ordinance and equipment everything has its limitations. Ignore the propaganda hub. Well, we got the latest, the greatest, and the best. Well, we did get the latest, may not have gotten the greatest, and may not be the best, but we do have the latest, whatever that might be, and sometimes that's not your first choice, but it's what, well, shouldn't say, shouldn't be your first choice. Somebody did it in the pentagram. So with the light rifles especially right now, And again, don't forget there's a couple other deals that are right now out there at Classic Firearms. Let's do that before I go any farther again. Apparently for a little under $400, we're looking at classicfirearms.com AR-15s. Don't know what they are yet. Haven't had a chance to look myself. Won't be able to do that until after we finish the program here. But another solution. Now it does require FFL if it's a complete weapon. Also, as a sub note, the New Jersey passed about seven additional, they were signed by the governor, I guess what yesterday or today, firearms laws. One of them is ammunition registration, phase one. So if you haven't seen that, you need to go look it up. But again, the first phase. in preparation for demanding all of the ammunition be individually accounted for the Danish and Dutch, you know, slash ammunition, Coke bottle system, you know, like you can't you can't buy any more ammo until you bring the empties back. That's the system they have. And it's why they're rolling over the Dutch right now and stealing the property from the farmers because everybody was too nice and they should have killed the international bastards years ago. But they all got goodies. Well now the goodies are not a benefit as opposed to what they're trying to do which is put the farmers out of business and steal everything. So what we need to do is kill the internationalists. They just need to be dead and gone. Very very gone. It's the only thing that's going to settle this. Well that's why they want to disarm you here because if you're wondering what they're doing, take a look at what's happening in Holland right now. And the Dutch people are pretty mellow and laid back. In fact, they were dopers for the longest time dudes. They were a running joke for the, you know, the powers that be back during the Vietnam War. You're not familiar with that? Whoa. We got about 10 minutes. However, we do have Craig. Oh, you know what? Thank you. Yeah, that's good. We have Craig from Forbid Knowledge coming up next. And I would remind you guys while he's on the air, let's get this, if he hasn't already worked it out. Craig from Forbidden Knowledge has copper rounds. We need to have him adjust the price to meet the market. And you guys need to be clearing those militia coins out at least. However, he has both types available, both I understand. So let's make a point of making sure we add more to our personal wealth inventory. those copper rounds at Craig, you know, at Forbidden Knowledge and you talk to Craig today when he's on the air and work out specifically the logistics for getting those out of Craig's hands and across the country to where they need to be. Just a reminder, I want to make sure that's done and because we also want to make more. He needs capital. He has his resources in hand. That's capital. You need capital he can use. Go ahead, call or chip in there. Yeah, just said with this registration, ammunition and that and what you said the other day, you know, what many of us have said and think in our own minds and hearts. Uh, look at these outlaws that claimed to be, uh, uh, you know, the, uh, people in charge or whatever you want to call it. Uh, we don't need to, uh, We don't need to listen to these pricks anymore. You don't listen to a criminal. You don't listen to an outlaw. You know, scoff at them, humiliate them, mock them. That's what I say. Anyway, that's all I got to say for now. Thanks. This is Liberty, y'all. Real quick, guys, before we go, I've changed the direction here, but not far, because it all has to do with everything. They keep quoting these numbers and what is it the Petosniffer Meat puppet said? 92% of the Democrats said that they'd vote for me. What they said is they were asked if Donald Trump had run. What 92% of the dunderheads idiots and incompetence would vote for Biden as opposed to Trump. That all these idiots who are bitching about Biden being the not being the product they thought he was. are then turning around and telling you, which is why I said they're not your friends, they're not your neighbors, these aliens screwed up nutcases would rather burn the country down and stand there cackling with the match in hand while they lit fires all around the perimeter and are stuck in the dining room in the middle of the house. That's the kind of in-edge nutcases you're dealing with, okay? Go ahead. Yeah, I got more respect for people who are developmentally disabled, they've got better sense and more integrity than these critters ever even had a thought about. Excuse me. Oh, again, go ahead. Go ahead, Mark. Okay. Well, the reason I bring that up is because nothing indicates, of course, in the same breath, they're pointing out that There isn't anybody that it's on the horizon that the Democrats supposedly could feel. Well, I would argue that that's not true because they feel that this turd without any problem at all knowing full well exactly what the problem was and you still have what? 92% of those surveyed said that they would vote for the incompetent fool that has torn this country down the way that it has. And by the way, it's Obama doing it. We know that. But this meat puppet is the one with the squiggle on the paper. And they're all stupid enough to tell you that, yeah, but they vote for him as opposed to the supposedly Trump or whatever else might be out there. And that tells you that there isn't the only product remorse is they were expecting more communism than they've already got. and that they were gonna ride high on stealing more stuff from you and they're pissed because, well, all the gimmes aren't showing up the way they expected and even if they do, the cost of doing business is such, and we're talking about just buying, if you're gonna buy Fritos and beer to sit on your dead ass and do nothing during the day, it's costing you a lot more for the Fritos and the beer and it wasn't supposed to be that way for the leftists, it was supposed to be freebies for them and We pay for everything. And it's like the fact that the digits aren't going as far. Well, that's because of the creatures and the mechanism that they brought into play. Well, and they didn't bring it to play because the fake collection was illegitimate from the get go. Okay. Good. Jump in their car. Yeah. These, uh, these Pito cracks. All right. And had a files, man. They are per person. They're spirits. They've been given up to the reprobate mind. Anyway, excuse me. These freaks, when they get into the joint, they pay protection. If they're convicted, pedophile or something like that, they get their ass handed to them on a daily basis. And most most convicts won't tell you that but it's because you know some filthy dog like that had had had diddled them when they were a young baby, you know But when they get in a joint van they knock the crap out of a man and I've seen it And that's exactly what I'm gonna do to you pricks when the time comes anyway There won't be any fence sitters, you know, you either be a a jerk on the side of slavery or you're gonna be a friend on the side of liberty. You know, and those in the middle, you wanna appease people? You're gonna die just like the enemy. Anyway, I'll shut up there. Thank you, be well, bless his liberty, all. Well, there isn't any side. I mean, there isn't any halfway now. In fact, that's becoming very apparent. I was listening to something. We're at the top. Craig's gonna be here in a minute. Some Fox News character was going, we need to punish the Democrats for what they did to our children. And it's like, wait a minute, back up here. That's throwing off the responsibility that the parents had from the get go to be keeping this thing, to keep this stuff in check. They should never have been allowed in any way, shape or form to get away with what they did. You don't whine about it after the fact when you handed your children over to a bunch of fruit loops that you already knew were fruit loops. Crazy. Another live episode if you're with listening on 13th of 2022. You're listening to a live broadcast. My name is Craig. You've been listening to Forbid Knowledge. You're welcome, Colin. I do have a topic. Is somebody trying to dump in there already? There's somebody saying something. You've got to need to mute your mic. Welcome to join in. I do have a topic today. I miss hearing feedback from my phone. I've been having problems with the phone. If I get cut off during the show, for some reason, I think there's probably a tower down in my area or something that my phone used before because I can't use it in most areas of my property anymore. have to go to a specific area to try to get it to work anyhow. So my phone service has kind of screwed up. Okay, I want to speak about, like brushed on last week, I want to talk about energy, price of gas, energy issues, electric cars, the grid, all sorts of things. China, I want to talk about all that tonight. I guess I should give a quick update first for those who have been following my... military truck saga. I tried to pull the engine yesterday, but the guy that came to help me watch it out to inspect my clutch said that the collision pull, you didn't think it would clear without pulling the transmission with it. So I may have to disconnect the transmission next and pull it with the transmission. There's plus potentially clear as oil pan would hit the axle. And even if I took the oil pan off, which I don't even think I can because the clearance is under there, it's a big issue. But anyway, I'm probably going to pull the transmission too. So I have to reattach the transmission to the engine in order to pull them both because I already have everything disconnected. So that's not going to be real fun, but 12 bolts that hold it to the transmission and it's very difficult to reach under there. I got to see if maybe the floor comes apart where I can do some of the nuts from the... some of the bolts from above because it was really hard to get all those all 12 bolts all around especially the top ones. Anyway and I have big from over the tires went through an hour trip twice. Personally first I got aluminum wheels and I found that those would not fit properly on my truck. They're meant for a different kind of truck and then so I went back and got steel wheels traded in for steel wheels and steel wheels one of them Kind of bad shape took them took them all into a sandblasted. You don't have to paint them and I should have tested one of those before I took them into a sandblasted make sure they're gonna work because they are apparently from a FMTD vehicle and I've been told they will fit so hopefully everything is gonna go good anyway I'm kind of at a standstill there right now I'm waiting for sandblasting on the wheels like you know back and paint them and Then the engine they got to go back in and undo the transmission and pull them both out for once apparently Anyway, whatever I talk about, and I put a new video up on YouTube six days ago, so it hasn't been too long. It was after my show last week. And it's called, it's the latest video on there. I don't see, I don't have that page up. But anyway, it's about the grid and about electric cars, the solar, wind, and the greeny. The greeny wanna be revolution. Which I am going to talk about tonight because it's not going to work. It's just simply not going to work. Now before I start this, let me preface this all by saying because you're not listening to somebody who's whining about the greenies because you know I want to get in my diesel and what do they call them? Cold roll? What do they call them? Oil roll? I don't know. They put a big pile of smoke in front of a Tesla or a... Prius ready those cars. I've owned electric cars long before anybody knew what a bezel was I've owned I don't for electric cars before anybody who knew what an EV1 was or even an impact anybody know what an impact is probably not Yeah, I've owned full electric cars made back going into the 80s. All right, so I know about electric cars Well, you're not listening to somebody who just took somebody that's just whining about things that even more anything about I also know quite a lot about solar and wind because I've been doing that for more than four decades. Solar and wind. Yeah, batteries, the whole bit. So I know a bit about what I'm talking about. And although I am now at the time, you might, people might have described me as being a greeny, even though that wasn't a thing. That wasn't a word at the time. At that time, the word was an environmentalist. I guess you probably could have. tag me as an environmentalist back then. That's not the primary reason I was doing it. It didn't have much to do with the environment. It really had to do with the energy crisis that we had back in the 70s, which I was old enough to remember. I wasn't old enough really to participate in it. I wasn't even old enough to drive. But I do remember what went on then and what happened not only during the crisis, but after the crisis all the way into the early 80s. The price of gas went over a dollar a gallon. We are talking almost $5 now. Price has been going down. So that's the primary reason I got into the alternative energy we called the time. We didn't call renewables at the time. It was called alternative energy. And you probably could have tagged me as being a environmentalist at the time. But now you might call it renewables. You might call it greenies. Green agenda. The green party or whatever. All around the world, we have These eco-socialist, Marxist, postmodernist, greenies, they're trying to change the world with their agenda of going green, which doesn't have a lot to do with going green at times. It really doesn't have a lot to do with green at times. They have a whole other kind of indigent that they're pushing along with it. These globalists have the almighty power, mass wealth and greed. And you're trying to control the world. Well, there's anybody, somebody trying to jump in there because I hear, I'm just hearing feedback. I'm getting bits and pieces of things coming in. Maybe it's just I'm hearing feedback. That's always annoying. Yes, I can. Can you hear me? Yes. Green weenies. Green weenies. That doesn't sound very apple-eyed. That's who the greenies are. They're green weenies. Yeah, okay. Yeah, well, don't disagree. And the reason I talked about this already, what I used to do and what I still do, because right now I'm sitting in front of 32 boxes that I opened up here a couple months ago that they all say made in China, unfortunately, and they are lithium-ion phosphate batteries. In each of these boxes there were two batteries per box. So I still do greeny stuff, but I don't... I'm not a part of that agenda. I'm part of alternative energy, ones that want to get off the grid, ones that want to be independent, ones that want to make their own electricity and screw the man, the utility man, whatever. That's the reason I do it, and energy savings, and plus the fact we're going to be running into, if you thought the energy crisis of the early 70s, 1973 was bad, this couldn't get a whole lot worse. Maybe not immediately, but it's going to slowly get worse and worse, and it's not going to get any better. No matter what promise you're hearing from the greenies about electric cars or getting rid of fossil fuels or whatever. They're making the worst And that's what I'm going to talk about So I'm not a part of the greenie agenda, but you you might Off the top of your head people like label me that and I take offense to it And I have a whole different reasoning behind doing what I do The whole solar thing And on the video that I posted, again, it's up there, it was posted six days ago, it's the most recent video on my YouTube channel called Forbid TV. Forbid is spelled with two D's, most spaced between the Forbid and the TV. And it's the latest video up there, and I'm standing on a roof of a solar system, on a house that my mother owns, and I am talking about the system, not so much the system, but about the agenda, the greetings, and what's going to happen in the future, and why we're headed for disaster. Yes, I'm looking at a four kilowatt system, which is important. What's going to talk about that to a four kilowatt? Photo photo will take solar rate. I don't even hear the word photo will take use anymore, but that's what we used to call them portable take panels. Nowadays, they just call solar panels. But these are the things that everybody's seen people's rooms or whatever. Maybe you have a little calculator that has a little photo to take panel or watch or something else that has a little panel. They're pretty common nowadays. that everybody probably, what everybody I might venture to say has one of some form or other in their possession, whether it be on a flashlight or whatever. So everybody probably has one of those things. And these days they have usually they're using conjunction with lithium ion batteries, which is the same kind of batteries and we're going to be talking about those. The batteries that are in your laptop and in your cell phones. That's the type of battery we used today back when I started which it was basically lead acid battery. There were nickel cadmium batteries too, but those were a lot, they were kind of exotic near a lot different technology and you don't even see those anymore at all. But you still see some lead acid batteries around even though they're not in the same configuration generally they were back way back then. The lead acid battery hasn't really changed much in more than 100 years. The lithium ion battery or there's two different types of lithium batteries. I want to talk about two. There's two types of lithium batteries, lithium ion batteries, which is the type you have in your computer and your cell phones. And then there's lithium ion phosphate batteries, which are the types of the boxes I'm sitting in front of now that are meant for larger systems, like for homes and stuff for backup batteries. These cells are 304 amp hours that I have. And they weigh, I think, about 15 pounds, 20 pounds. I can't, I don't really, I forgot what their weight is. And each one is 3.4 volts. And you put wire them in series and get whatever voltage you want. And they're DC electric. But anyway, we're all kind of a little bit familiar with now with solar panels and lithium ion batteries. Lithium ion plastic batteries are a little bit different. Your electric cars, they generally are having, right now, lithium ion batteries in it, like your cell phones, like your cell phones and computers. laptops. Some of them are going with other types of technology, but those aren't widely available yet. There's still a lot of research going on with batteries. Even though we've moved on from lead-acid batteries for the most part, certainly with electric cars and laptops and whatever, they don't have We still don't have the technology to make this chemical storage form of energy storage work. It's a chemical form of energy storage. You're exchanging ions through different metals. Okay, so lead batteries. Lead, there's all sorts of different components they can use for the plates. And in the more modern batteries, they use primarily as the metals, the rare minerals that are in there are lithium, cobalt. nickel and also I'm going to talk a little bit about neobedium. I probably can't, I didn't say that right, I'm sure. Neobedium, that's where mineral use and magnets that are primarily used in the motors and then of course in wind generators in large amounts. And all of those metals that I just mentioned, they all have to be mined, they all have to be found, they have to be mined, they have to be processed, they have to be shipped and treated and they have to be produced. And the mining technology for those things. It's still old school. We still don't have a lot of automation or it's very, well, I guess when old school is not a guy in a tunnel with a shovel, but it's not far off from that. And the process is extremely toxic. The whole thing with the mining of the minerals for these things is it a toxic, very dangerous, profession to get these out of the earth. Not only that, let's see lithium mining, I got a page up here that I picked up really quick for lithium mining. Presently, most of the production of lithium mining that goes into electric cars and your laptops and so on. And in years past, we had a huge growth in the last couple decades of lithium mining because of laptops and cell phones. But with electric cars, we're going to be talking about massively increasing the amount of production. Imagine this, you can probably fit all the lithium batteries you have in your whole lifetime right now, that you own right now. You can fit them in two hands. Hold on your hand, two hands. You can fit all the lithium that you own right now in those two hands. When the greenings that are trying to force us to go to open cars, when you go to electric cars, you're going to need wheelbarrow upon wheelbarrow of lithium for each electric company you have. So we're talking about a massive increase in mining required to get this lithium out of ground. And cobalt and nickel and all the other minerals you're going to need to make use of electric cars. And we're talking about the batteries here. Batteries is the biggest sticking point for electric cars. It always has been. It has been for 100 years. Yeah, the electric car has been around for more than 100 years. People seem to be shocked by that. But all you've got to do is go online and look up. But for instance, a baker was one model. There are other models available. Just look up the baker. Look up a 1918 baker or whatever. In fact, Jay Leno has a channel, a YouTube channel, where he owns one of those cars that he thinks would first spin on a YouTube channel that he has. So the electric car has been around for 100 years, more than 100 years. In fact, back 100 years ago, you might have found on the roads several types of vehicles that walled kind of competition for one another. You had the infernal combustion engine, which is the gasoline powered. You had diesel. You had steam cars. You had and then you had electric cars and of course you had horses and buggies and bicycles with huge wheels, right? very strange sight gotta be so Right now most of the lithium is produced in Australia the next most Abundant countries right now mining is Chile followed by China Argentina Zimbabwe Okay now with cobalt and nickel It so happens that Russia is one of the biggest suppliers and miners of those metals. So you can already see problems there about supply issues for electric cars. In the future, here's the projection of the lithium reserves that are believed to exist on the planet. And Chile has the most... projected reserves on the planet that right now today's technology we believe is available in the ground to be mine. Chile is going to be the number one producer, followed by Australia, then Argentina, then China, followed by Zimbabwe to a much lesser degree. And if you go down the list, you're talking about Portugal, Brazil, Namibia, USA. So very but those other ones are Intetesimally small compared to Chile Australia and China and Argentina and just massive amount more amounts of lithium on the planet in those countries So there's there's a problem right there batteries are the big sticking point and right now those are the minerals we need now that could change in five or ten years and every Every day just about on YouTube. I see something pop up because I follow the videos about new technologies and stuff and every day on YouTube, the new and latest and greatest thing, here's the battery made of salt, here's the storage, hundreds and hundreds of things that supposedly is gonna be the next game changer for energy storage. And well, okay, let's wait and see, because you speak as nothing, you show me something that works. It's like you told me there's a Tesla invented a wireless wire transmission system that give you free energy all over the world for nothing and not need to be metered and blah blah blah. Well, no, show me. What he was experimenting with was that at all. Yes, he was transmitting energy through the air. We've seen that for more than a hundred years with the radio and wireless and everything else we got. RF frequencies. But no, there is no real evidence, no real evidence other than your memes that Tesla has something that was... He built a tower that he was experimenting with, but it was kind of a failure. It didn't transmit it very far and not to empower levels and it was kind of dangerous. But people don't want to... If I ignore that and scream about how there's free energy, you know, I've been there, done that. I've been all down that free energy route for many decades. The only thing I've actually had and seen that worked that actually had was a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a somehow faked and it's not a thing. Unfortunately, I mean, I wish that was true, but it doesn't seem to be. I haven't seen anything. Yes, you have hydrogen generators for your car. It won't really work. They produce hydrogen, but they don't increase your gas mileage. I mean, when you really look into all this stuff, it's all just memes. It doesn't work. Sorry to burst your bubble on that. But anyway, because I've been into this for a long time. I studied this and I finally gave up on it because I just kept getting running into dead ends and spending a lot of energy concentrating on one particular meme that turned out to be a nonsense also or didn't exist or it was just a lie from the beginning because somebody was trying to get hits on their website or get you donate money for their cause because they have this machine that runs forever on no energy. No, no, no. Sorry. Anyway, a lot of people don't like to hear that. Okay, but electric cars do exist, solar does exist, wind does exist, micro hydro, right now I'm talking about small scale stuff. I'm going to talk about utility scale stuff too. Because I haven't done, dealt with much with the utility scale stuff of course, because I'm not a utility, but I do have generated all my own power for many decades in various forms and various times in my life. And I've been both great intertide and totally independent and it's it's not what the greenies want you to believe it is Okay, first of all, I talked about this 4 kilowatt system that I have on this roof that I showed in that video that I stood stood in front of the whole video It's not 4 kilowatt. That's the number one lie from greenies when you're comparing a kilowatt capacity Or megawatt or terawatt, whatever, you know, whatever level of wattage you're talking about When you're comparing a wind system Comparing it and listen, I'm just gonna use kilowatts because it's a little more accessible for most of us in our minds than getting into megawatts or terawatts Gigawatts, but anyway when you when you talk about a kilowatt capacity or a rated output of a system It's not what it is In other words, okay If you rate or if you let's let's just say let's use a four kilowatt for all. Okay, we have a four kilowatt coal or natural gas rate output or hydroelectric or what are the other ones out there maybe nuclear if you talk about any of those when they say four kilowatt they actually can put up four kilowatts 24-7 aside from the times when they're down for maintenance or refueling or something of that nature okay all of those systems there they actually will pull out four kilowatts if that's what they're ready for a solar system created four kilowatts doesn't put anywhere near four kilowatts So you need to compare apples apples. So you're really talking about only 25% of that. You're only talking about one kilowatt. I averaged out the system here and it really only puts out about one kilowatt. By averaging a mean, well because that's the sun. It's dependent on the sun. It's variable. When the sun's out at noon and there's no clouds in the sky and it's new, then okay, you might get four kilowatts. There's a whole lot of ifs there. It's in butts, right? First of all, Your system a four kilowatt system after the first year is going to be about four to five percent less No more like a bird like around three percent less about three percent less than four kilowatts after a year because it degrades Also, we're panels degrade over time and they degrade about point eight percent each year thereafter First year is the most degradation then thereafter. They degrade lesser, but it's about point eight percent each year So I'll figure 1% of you. So the system that I stood in front of, which is three years old, has about 5% degradation already. So it's not generating 4 kilowatts, even at high noon on a cloudless day. It's only putting out about 3.8 kilowatts. So there's your first strike. It degrades over time. And of course, by the way, that solar plant you're going to have to replace after about 20, 25 years. Well, solar panels and wind generators too, but we'll get into that in a second. So you have to add those into the coffin. You're comparing a nuclear plant, for instance, which lasts 60 years, and you're comparing the solar, well, you're going to have to triple or quadruple that solar number to meet the lifespan of a, and then batteries, that's a whole other story, you have to ten times that for the batteries, because they won't last that long at all. So anyway. Solar is not what it says to be. The greenies are lying to you. Flat up lying to you. When they say they got a four kilowatt solar array, they don't. It's 3.8 the most. Because you know what I found out through my research and my experimentation that my solar array puts out averaging about zero at night. So right there, that's half the day, half the 24-hour period where it cannot put anywhere near 4 kilowatts, it's putting on exactly 0 kilowatts. So you could chop that number in half right away to 2,000. Then if you look at even a sunny day with no clouds in the sky, the longest days of the year, which is right about now, the last few weeks have been the longest days of the year. You're still only getting, as you look at it, it's like a bell curve. It looks like a bell. And I show this graph on my website, on that video. I show the graph showing the production of this particular system I'm standing by and showing that, well, at about 6 a.m., it's, okay, there's one lot. And then... 9 p.m., okay, there's one lot down the other way. So it just goes up from there to peak it. But if you look at the graph, only if we're about noon, at about noon, does it create its full capacity, which in this case now is 3.8. And a cloudy day, I show graphs for cloudy days. Oh boy, it's something else. And winter, when the sun's covering the panels, and winter when the days are much shorter, where you only have like half the sunlight. And then, it also depends, there's a lot depending on how your solar panels are oriented, if they're on trackers, which 99% of them are not on trackers. Meaning they move towards, they face the sun all the time. You get more energy when a solar panel faces the sun directly. They got a 90 degree, straight towards the sun. But most of the time, of course, they aren't. And that's why at noon, you get the most capacity from a solar cell, because it's perpendicular to the sun in that hour or so. But the rest of time it's not and you're getting less energy from your solar system If you look at the averages the numbers, it's only about 25 percent rate capacity. So if you're gonna rate a four kilowatt Solar array to a four kilowatt coal plant You're really gonna have to have four of those four kilowatt arrays equal that one coal plant equal the same amount of energy Feel me? But it gets worse. Well, and let me start by wind for a second too because the same thing applies to wind My wind machine is rated at 25 watt, I'm sorry, 25 miles per hour. It's almost never 25 miles an hour. Very rarely is it 25 miles an hour. It's usually much less, sometimes it's not turning at all, and that produces zero energy when it's not turning. And most of the time, even with a 17.5 kilowatt Jacobs wind generator, it's usually producing less than a thousand watts. So the same kind of story goes for wind wind is also very variable now there are places where you got wind all the time and that's great It gives you gets your investment money back to better use if you're in area like that and so to I'm in Michigan right now But so if you're you know, the desert of New Mexico or Arizona something like that where you clear a lot of time and you have great Sun Okay, you're gonna get more you've got more bang for your buck for solar But it's still not rated what they claim it claim it is Okay, the battery storage. Here's the big crux. The big problem. This is why the whole grainy movement falls flat on its face with solar, wind, well, primarily those two. Not so much hydroelectric, because hydroelectric, it can run at variable outputs by choice. not by nature. Well, nature somewhat actually, because if you look what's happening in Lake Mead right now, they're having to cut back and they may end up having to shut down that hydroelectric power plant at Lake Mead, Hoover Dam. They may have to shut it down at some point because they're running dangerously low to where they have no more water in Lake Mead to use to generate power with. So, the hydroelectric now has a form of a battery, a nature's battery, water going flowing by gravity. And they can control the rate of electricity coming out of Urdam or any hydroelectric plant by opening and closing various valves to make water flow less or more as needed. But the hydroelectric plant that was rated at 4 kilowatts will be, can generate 4 kilowatts. at full speed, 24-7, unless there's a problem of the dam or maintenance problem or no rain or whatever. But if there's plenty of water, it can run at that four kilowatts. Again, we're using four kilowatts. Those are small numbers for a hydroelectric plant and small numbers for anything except for home solar. The average home solar system right now in this country is about five kilowatts. This is close to being a normal-sized system. Five-kilowatt system is not going to run your house. A five-kilowatt system covers about half your roof of most houses depending on your two-story, one-story ranch, whatever. It's a big array. You're talking maybe 15 feet by 30 feet, something of that nature for an array that big. And when I say half your roof, I mean half your south facing roof. So about one-fourth of your roof. That's a really rough number there. So, uh, but that's not gonna run your house you might pretend it's gonna run your house and I guess I'm getting so many comments from people on various YouTube comment sections and all my channel I'm off grid and I challenge anybody on my YouTube video. No, nobody is off grid Nobody is off grid now that may sound like a bold statement, but let me explain why I say that Because I've been trying to do this for decades. Okay. Nobody is off grid Okay, how big a system you have? Okay, how many batteries you have? No one is off grid. You might not be hooked up to the electric grid, but you're still burning something. Using wood, using propane, using natural gas, using biofuels, diesel for your diesel or gasoline for your generator, you are burning something. You are not off grid. Where do you get that fuel from? Now the wood you might get from your woods, but you're still, even if you, if you, your claim will come using wood, okay, your water, your hot water, your heat for your house, your water heater. clothes dryer These are all things you have that you are powering with other means if you are quote off grid unquote You are burning something you're using something else and you're not something else other than wood comes from society Which uses which use fossil fuels or the grid? To produce get that natural gas to your to your your house. There's a lot to happen to get to get it there And you're pending on society. To jump in your car to go get groceries. There's that gas and of course the vehicle you're driving in and by itself. Did you make that vehicle with wood? And your solar system? No, you didn't. Society, there's more than just you. There's a bigger picture than just you. It's society as well. Industry, commercial, way our transportation, the way our country runs. There's more than just you to being off grid. So this world will never be off grid. I mean, unless there's some vertical collapse, but then that's why 90% of us die. If all of a sudden there is no grid after a year, 90% of us will be die. We have to go back to a very much lower population in order to survive in this world. And if everybody did like, if anybody out there climbing their off grid, if everybody did what you did, society would collapse very quickly, very quickly. And not only that, but the pollution would go way up. Imagine not everybody in the city burning wood. London experienced this at some one time where millions of people died from the pollution. If everybody was off grid and burning wood, pollution would be tremendous. Our forests would disappear. Our populations are just too great for that to even work today, like maybe it did for the American Indians, or whatever, lower populations. This is not going to work today. So we have to reduce our populations massively for any kind of off-grid situation to work to have any sort of comfort level whatsoever. And by comfort level, I'm just talking about heat, and I guess I should be talking about survival level. Heat and air conditioning. Okay, if you live between the tropics of Capricorn and tropics of Cancer, you probably don't need heat. Okay, and you could have an electric system that could be off-grid, and you could survive that way if you live without air conditioning. You see, even if you're living in those warm climates, of course we can. Or you can have fans, and of course we did live that way. In fact, that's probably where most of us human race is designed to be surviving, is somewhere between those two regions of the world. In this country, that would really only mean Florida, Southern California, you know, they're not within a tropical cat or cat or corn or tropical cancer. That would be... Areas that are be survivable, but in the winter time are you surviving anywhere else? Are you really surviving angles without burning wood and all that? We aren't really the human race isn't really we weren't designed to live in these winters that we have In North America, we really aren't that without any kind of major work to survive through it and would hold the bill for many eons so But today it really can't be done. So you're really not awkward and I challenge anybody Just show them, show them anybody that is off grid and nobody really is. Unless you're living in the jungles of Zimbabwe or something. Don't have any clue about society, some kind of tribe. Some people that live in off grid have no contact with the outside world. Something deep in the brain forest of Brazil or something. So, all right, batteries and storage. That's the problem. You're not going to be able to run this world. without having energy storage and batteries aren't sitting the bill. They aren't going to work. We don't have the materials needed to build that many. Biden says we're going to have half the cars in the country in 10 years, well not 10 years, 12, 13 years. By 2030, no, 20, yeah 2030. I think he said 2030 wasn't it? Was it 2030 or 2035? Half the cars are going to be electric. Not going to happen. You're talking disaster there. Besides the aforementioned lithium and all the other minerals need to go into it that we don't have presently We don't even really have the capacity to get and even we do finally find more of it and mine it the price is gonna go up so Astronomical because of the demand you're putting a huge all-sub demand on the system which Industry cannot supply right now and it's going to be a madhouse you think the price of electric cars expensive now Most electric cars even the cheap ones are like 40 grand The Ford, what they call the lightning, the truck, I think the base of the bear model is like 40 grand. Tesla started like 50 and go up. Electric cars are not cheap and they're going to get worse when this lithium and all these components that's needed to make these batteries becomes rarer and rarer or harder to get or just a short supply. We see supply issues right now with just computer chips. Imagine trying to get a supply problem going with with with lithium-ion or lithium-ion phosphate batteries. It's not going to go. It's not going to work. We're going to all of a sudden see the price will have to go way up. It'll be a shortage. People won't even be able to get them. And here Biden's sitting there with a spell up his ass. Our decomposer and chief are going to try to tell you, yeah, you need an electric car by the year 2030. Not going to happen. There's not enough there. No supply. So you're talking about a massive failure. And even if we could get there, think about this. Right now our grid is at its limits. It's stretched to the limit right now. If you think you're going to put electric cars on the road by the year 20, whatever, you need a 30% larger grid. 30% more capacity to handle everybody driving electric cars. So where are you going to get that from? You going to get it from the greenie suggestion? Since you got to do away with fossil fuels, right? Greenie say, oh, you can't have fossil fuels. So you're going to do away with coal and natural gas and oil and all this, anything, fossil fuels. Since you're going to get rid of all that, that means you're going to go where? You're going to go greeny, greeny meanings, and you're going to go with solar and wind, right? Can't have that nuclear. That's a dirty word. You're not gonna if we went there out if you start shutting on coal plants and all these other plants now granted I agree that we need to eventually get rid of fossil fuels, but we can't do it right now Now if you want to maintain any kind of semblance of society like you have now because if you do that now you have massive rolling blackouts and Extremely high energy price you think for energy prices are high right now. Oh boy. You haven't seen nothing yet We have got by no matter how much somebody must might want to complain about it We actually have gotten very cheap energy all of our lives Even that $5 a gallon gas including that we have cheap energy We've gone for the low-hanging fruit fossil fuels are much easier to get our electricity from than other sources cheaper and easier, so that's why we've gone there and It's got to where we are now now You notice I'm not mentioning anything about climate change or global warming. I'm not even fitting that into the picture now. That's another thing the Greenies do, but I'm not even going to talk about that. It doesn't matter. The Greenies, who have the power and control of things, they're driving us towards a fossil fuel-free future, which is going to be an absolute disaster. They think they're going to do it with wind and sun, but they can't. Maybe some of them don't know that yet. They're gonna find out the hard way and when you start shutting down fossil fuels and nuclear You're talking about major major societal collapse as far as energy goes because then you only have energy when the Sun is shining Or when the winds blowing and okay. Yeah, it's something shining and China So the shine here right now, but it's not shining in China. Okay, so we just ship our we just Transport our energy to shine. No that you got lines transmission losses you lose a lot of power Eventually, the longer you transport that power through the electrical lines, the more you lose. So no, just because it's sunny in New Mexico and it's cloudy in New Hampshire, that doesn't mean you're going to power New Hampshire with New Mexico at the time, because that's just too far. It's got to be fairly close. It can't be transported all the way around the world. So that doesn't work. Don't give me that crap either about being able to send it to states that don't have the energy right now. Like the wind. Like also a wind in some places like off the coast of Wales, for instance. Boy, they got wind all the time. Those things run constantly at full production. Great place for wind. And there may be other places in the country that that's the case. But for most of it, that's not the case. So batteries, storage. Now the only exception to all this is hydroelectric. Hydroelectric has storage. Hydroelectric can be throttled. Hydroelectric can be, you can basically almost shut hydroelectric off during times when the sun is shining and you don't need the electricity on the grid if you try to go all solar. And then crank open those valves and let that water flow to generate power during peak times when you need the power because the peak hours, the main peak hours for electricity are between the hours of 4 p.m. and 9 p.m. That's when solar drops off to nothing. So the bell curves don't match. They'll match. So you got to store that energy somehow. And hydroelectric is the only thing, if you get rid of fossil fuels and nuclear, hydroelectric is the only thing you have as far as storage goes. Now, there are some places that have tried the battery thing, and don't give me that whining thing about Australia and other places. We've been all completely independent of the blah, blah, blah. No, you haven't. If you look at those systems, they don't cover all the bases. The Tesla has been trying to promote his battery banks for utility scale stuff, which he has. And Australia is one of the test cases. They had a big fire at one of them, and it's just not going to work. You can't store, we don't have any kind of near the capacity of storage right now with batteries. Even though batteries is fairly efficient, the recovery rate on lithium iron phosphate batteries for utility storage is like 94%. Now we have a lot of other means to store energy. Don't get me wrong, there are dozens of them, and I don't want to go over each one, all the way from liquid air to hydrogen to flywheels to capacitors. There's just dozens and dozens of them, but none of them have panned out as being... Safe and or effective and or practical pump storage is one of the best that has about a 70% recovery rate Pump storage is where and that can only be used in some parts of the country frankly where it's mountainous is about the only place that really work Pump storage where you're pumping water When you have extra pop extra electricity, let's say from solar which you don't really have If you've got electric extra electricity from solar wind and you pump it into a you build a lake high in the mountains or is elevated, however high you can get it. And then when you need the extra energy, you let that water go through like a hydroelectric system, like a dam. And that's a form of battery, a form of energy storage, I'm sorry, a form of energy storage that can be used like a battery. And that's great, because it can be within about 20 to 30 seconds, it can be ramped up to create a completely different level of electricity from storage. But you have to be in a mountainous area. There's a big infrastructure thing and there's even a green thing with that believe it or not greenies And we can expand our hydroelectric too, but greenies have a problem with that because oh it might hurt some fish And same with these lakes, these artificial lakes, the pump storage. There's different ways you can do it. You could have tanks as well, but then that gets even more expensive and elevated. But there's problems environmentally with those too. So the greenies don't even like that a whole lot, but that's going to be their best choice when it comes to energy storage, when they think they're going to go with wind and solar. So that's the big, that's why the whole renewables thing is a big red herring, storage. Not just storage, but also the devices that are powering the devices. And a lot of people say, I've seen these cars that can go forever that have something but solar panels and they can go all day. Yeah, those cars are super light, carbon fiber, basically laying on the ground. The eraser is extremely aerodynamic. And they can go for quite a ways. But if you try putting solar panels, try covering your entire car with solar panels. I think you're going to crawl across country with it. You're just fooling yourself completely. You can only go that apply only extend your range about a mile if that before your batteries are dead. Not going to help hardly at all. It does. It's not a thing. So don't even go there. I've heard a lot of that over my year decades of doing this electric cars and so on. I've I've seen it all hurt at all. Or just put some big wind blades on the front of my car and they'll generate electricity. I was like, oh, and they'll just propel my car. They'll generate electricity and keep my car going forever. No, it doesn't work that way. Now you're talking about free energy thing again and just that doesn't work. So there's a lot to see what my time is here. I got 10 more minutes to go. There's a lot to this. The greenies are basically hiding from you. Their whole system of this nonsense is not going to work. If you go on YouTube and start looking at videos about people who actually own the cars and people who want to be honest about how far they can go, the troubles they have when they have to go a long distance, because right now, I think that truck that I mentioned, the F-150, which is like the most popular vehicle in the country or something, the F-150 version electric is the lightning, I think it's called, and you can only go about really, well, I say 230 miles, but it really won't even do that. Here's the thing. Ratings are deceptive in the way of battery management also. I regularly use an electric scooter to get around for short distances. And this electric scooter is a more modern one, more advanced than the ones you see in your big cities. I've seen them all over the country. The larger cities have these scooters you can rent just from the side of the road. You just jump on one, you put an app on your phone or credit card or whatever, and you're off. And they go about 15 miles an hour and you're fine or whatever. I don't use mine for transportation. It's another form of electric vehicle that I use. And it's rated, it goes, this one goes 35 miles per hour. And it's got suspension. The ones you see in the cities don't. And they only go 15 miles an hour. And they'll generally only go about 15, 20 miles range. But that's if you're babying it. You see electric cars and the scooter, and the scooter I have is I think they rate it as being to go like 35 miles distance also, 35 miles per hour, 35 miles distance. It's got lithium ion batteries in it. They're underneath the deck where you stand. Some would want a Tesla or an electric car would have. But the reality, the actual range... is like close to half of that, the way I use it. Now, I'm in the countryside on Country Roads and I'm basically going 35 miles an hour full throttle the whole time. And the range is like half of that. 15 miles, let's say, is about the most I should expect to get out of that. And luckily, the distance I'm going is always a lot less than that. But you see what I'm saying, so I can always take and charge up. But it does not how it... The electric cars, if it's rated at, let's say, the 230... 230 miles distance for the lightning. There was a real world experiment, somebody, they had a run off of this series of YouTube videos where they're comparing, I don't know the names of the trucks, but one was a diesel, one was a gasoline, one was a hybrid, and one was electric, and electric was a lightning. And they towed a trailer, and they could only go about 100 miles on the lightning, following a trailer. And even without the trailer, Your range is going to be a lot less. If you're going on the highway, going 55 miles an hour down the highway, or 70, or whatever your speed limit is, you're going to get a lot less range than that 230 miles an hour guarantee. You're going to get a lot less range. That 130 miles per hour thing is like probably rated where I'd have to look at the way they rate these things these days, but you're probably only going like 10 miles an hour on a test track steady for that for hour long it takes until your range is zero. So you've depleted your battery. That's another lie of the greenies is your electric car isn't going to get the range that the numbers tell you that you should be getting. When you jump into your car and you have the display screen that says you have 230 miles left and 100% battery and then you start going down the road and all of a sudden, well, wait a minute. Now I got 50% battery left and I've only got half of that already. Or one fourth of that, whatever. You're not going to get the range that they're claiming you're going to get. Similar to the way you jump in a car and you're gunning it all the time, you're not going to get the mileage that you were supposed to get according to the EPA ratings. Not as severe though. Not as severe as, yeah, you jump in a car and it gets 25 miles a gallon, you're gunning it all the time, you're probably getting 20, you're still probably getting about 20. Well, that's not the case. You're going to get a lot less. So, let's see how the American people are going to put up with this, whether or not they're willing to go with less range. Speed is not an issue whatsoever electric car. You easily can go 100 miles an hour or more electric car. So we know the speed isn't a problem. The acceleration isn't a problem. The Americans won't have a problem with acceleration. They're better than the better gas car. Yes. I got to come up because I know the video that you're talking about and it conked out at 75 miles. I figured it probably could have gone 100. But they ended the test early with the electric. The hybrid kept going, but the pure electric vehicle forfeited, basically forfeited the match because of how much time it was taking to charge. Everybody does that, isn't it? Because that's the eye opener for most people. It's like, he had time to watch a movie, get food, get dinner, and the other guy was already done with his half of the trip and already working his way back anyway. So they just decided to call it quits on his vehicle. Right and that same YouTube channel, but I don't think on this video it I haven't investigated further the same YouTube channel wants to take a trip from Southern California somewhere all the way up to a peppermint they dead something deadpool in Alaska or something is the very part most farther northern city and they want to do that same test with those trucks. But the electric, they're having all sorts of problems figuring out the logistics of doing that, of getting that electric truck all the way up to northern Alaska, where there basically are no charging stations. They're talking about going to campgrounds and parking overnight, charging up. But 110 or 220, you can't fully charge up that truck overnight with even 220. And so they're talking about bringing generators and also using the hybrid truck as a generator to keep the electric one going. So that's a video they've either done or they're planning to do. I don't know if they've done that yet. I think they're still in the process of getting ready to do that. But that's the same channel. Trying to go a long distance. If you have to go farther than your range of your vehicle that can go, your electric car, if you have to go farther than that, You're kind of screwed because now you got to stop for rather lengthy charging. Now you can get boosts for 15, 20 minutes at a time. It'll get you maybe to where you're going. But if you're in cross country, no, you're talking about sitting there for hours waiting for your car to charge up even at the highest rate and at the highest rate, highest charge rate, it's damaging your batteries. The more heat you put, the faster you charge, the more heat you're generating and they're going to damage your batteries quicker than if you charge them at a more lower rate. You can go home and plug your car in over nine. If you don't, if you don't go 10, 20 miles each day, you can do that at home. No problem with a lower charge rate. And you'd probably be at 220, 220 outlet, uh, one 10, which all of my electric cars are one 10 actually. But my electric cars are, are, are lead acid batteries and they aren't, and they don't have the, the light that the distance capacity that the range of the modern ones. And so overnight is fine for that type of vehicle. But those are also only 50 mile range. They're the old lattice of batteries. So they're even more limited than the modern ones with the lithium ion phosphate batteries or lithium ion batteries. So electric cars, let's see if the American public is willing to put up with that after decades of using the cars we have now where you just, okay, you're only spending a few minutes of the gas station filling up and you're going again. And you're going forever, not forever, but you're going to stop for another five or 10 minutes. It's not a big deal to have to stop every 400, 500 miles, depending what the range of your cars. But electric, you're going to get half that and half of that even yet. So you're not going to get the range. You're not going to be able to take long trips with it. If it's your second car and you only go 15 miles an hour, 15 to work or 30 miles to work or whatever, hey, they're great. But again, where are we going to get all this lithium? Especially if you have a two-car family and you're going to have to go all electric, you're just not going to have the second work. We're not going to have the electricity to do it. We aren't going to have the lithium to do it. We aren't going to have the cobalt or the nickel to do it. We're just not going to be able to do it. And if you get rid of nuclear and coal and gas, then you're really screwed. Because now you only have electricity in the middle of the day when it's sunny. At night, you're kind of screwed. Basically nothing, unless the hydroelectric plant can run all night at the levels needed to be able to, or wind. Now wind does, wind can produce some at night. Wind is less at night. I don't know if you know that. Many places it will be windy all the time, but many places the wind stops at night, or certainly reduces. It's just the geological, the meteorologist will tell you why. I don't, can't give you the exact why. There's some way the sun shines and the winds blow, it blows less at night. So you get less energy out of wind at night, but you might be back beginning some. And the wind is extremely variable. The sun is more predictable. You have a curve and you know you're getting zero at night with the sun. The wind is way up and down and you never know what's getting in exactly. But there's something called Pico's that would be have to follow that's going to be very critical in order to get your system to work And I only have a minute or two left, but very briefly California has a solar glut right now They have too much solar they all their incentives and tax incentives and rebates and everything that's kicking them in the butt right now because now they have too much solar in the middle of the day in some areas and now they're having to They're going to charge customers $8 per kilowatt to keep their system online Because they don't want anymore solar trying to discourage people now from getting solar because they already have too much because now at peak hours They have to raise the rates up to as high as 65 cents per kilowatt hour whereas normally in California It's like 25 cents most of the country is at 14.4 cents per kilowatt hour I think average the whole country but California is like 10 cents more than and then during peak hours between four and nine It's it's over 50 cents a kilowatt hour because they're trying to kind of get people to discourage people from using electricity during that time of day So they don't have to put in another coal plant or another natural gas plant because solar and continent, they don't have the storage. They're also trying to pilot a program where all the people with these Tesla power walls, they're trying to get them to charge them up during the day. And then so the grid can dry off of them during the peak hours because they're going to have a huge infrastructure problem to try to increase the capacity, the storage, and then also the capacity for peak hours. You are addicted to electricity and there's not much you can do about it. See if you can break your addiction to electricity. Our world would be better off. I know I'm addicted to electricity. I'm trying to find a way to keep my addiction going. A figure walked in through the mist with a flintlock in his hand. His clothes were torn and dirty as he stood there by my bed. He took off his three-cornered hat, and speaking low to me, he said, we fought a revolution to secure our liberty. We wrote the Constitution as a shield from tyranny. For future generations, this legacy we gave. In this, the land and home of the brave. The freedoms we secured for you, we hoped you'd always keep. But tyrants labored endlessly while your parents were asleep. Your freedom's gone, your courage lost. You're no more than a slave. In this, the land of the free and home of the brave. You buy permits to travel and permits to own a gun. Permits to start a business or to build a place for one. On land that you believe you own, you pay a yearly rent. Although you have no voice in saying how the money's spent. Your children must attend a school that doesn't educate and your Christian values can't be taught according to the state. You read about the current news in a regulated press and you pay a tax you do not owe to please the IRS. Your money is no longer made of silver nor of gold. You trade your wealth for paper so your life can be controlled. You pay for crimes that make our nation turn from God and shame. number. You've traded in your name. You've given government control to those who do you harm so they could burn down churches and seize the family farm and keep our country deep and dead. Put men of God in jail. Harash your fellow countrymen while corrupted courts prevail. Your public servants don't uphold the solemn oaths they've sworn. And your daughters visit doctors so their children won't be born. Your leaders send artillery and guns to foreign shores and send your sons to slaughter fighting other people's wars Can you regain the freedoms for which we fought and died? Or don't you have the courage or the faith to stand with pride? And are there no more values for which you'll fight to save? Or do you wish your children to live in fear and be a slave? O sons of the Republic, arise, take a stand, defend the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the land, preserve our great Republic and each God given right. And pray to God to torture freedom burning bright. As I awoke, he'd vanished in the mist from whence he came. His words were true. We are not free, but we have ourselves to blame. For even now as tyrants trample each God given right we only watch in tremble too afraid to stand and fight If he stood by your bedside in a dream while you were asleep and wondered what remains of the freedoms he fought to keep What would be your answer if he called out from the grave? One day closer to victory for all of our brothers and sisters on and behind the lines in occupied territories south southwest southeast northeast ladies and gentlemen you were listening to us on www.libertytreeradio.4mg.com Liberty Tree Radio dot org and we're on satellite once they hide all of our friends out there With the Merchant Marine and other technologies and locations virtually across the globe and on every ocean right now. Say thank you. And also we're in a myriad of communications technologies both inside and outside these United States. And it is weapons Wednesday. It is the 13th of July, it is the 14th year of open and in your face Fabian Socialist and Soviet Socialist occupation of America with a K. This will be ending. We will have to make it end. Again, 2022 Old Earth Calendar. Help me, Spock. Help me. Good 2022, Battle for the Republic, the Dance of Swords. And again, beautiful day today. Had little rain squalls, perfect combination, balanced between the two. Gotta say that. little bit of rain and the plants just perked right up. I mean happy plants. I'm not talking a little happy. I'm talking really happy. I jumped a good two and a half inches for some of my pepper plants today. And the tomatoes are just looking hardcore. You know there's a difference between kind of soft and they're a little up dry and you know the yellow. No, we're looking lush, solid, healthy green. rich dark green for the tomato plants. That's a good sign. Plus I actually got a tomato off one of the tiny tomatoes, the tiny tot. That's kind of cool. So that's a first for the season so far off. Basically we're orphan plants. I always get the orphan plants that they want to throw away and bring them back to life and produce foods. and it's a way to work at something and that way down the road you're gonna have a little bit of experience what works, what doesn't work, what may be a problem, what may not be a problem. Remember, we learn now so that we will be ready later. Anyway, and food is a weapon, it's weapons Wednesday, food is a weapon, okay? Next, first of all, over at classicfirearms.com, I'm gonna mention this for all you guys looking for solutions, classicfirearms.com, AR-15s, under $400 a piece. Again, I didn't get a chance. I realized I had to get right back outside and put some more tactical paint on some stuff because it can always dry while I'm doing the program. So I didn't get a chance to get into classic this last hour and just got into a lot of other work. And I always have something that's frustrating doing a panel that's got to go on another vehicle. And it's a steel panel. Unfortunately, every time you try, I thought you got something done, you realize you got distracted for a second. Well, maybe not so much distracted, but you're thinking ahead. And so I had to go over a few things twice, especially with the arc. This thing is part of a turret hatch. It's just one of the things I'm perfect. Yeah, I know I think you get a lot. You can do this good enough Yeah, it probably was but I like to make sure it's done right now. We have somebody else sees that they can't go boy. That was done half-ass That's just me. So the way my dad taught me do it right the first time and no one has to follow up until it gets really broken You know crush fold its middle or mutilated maybe then they won't ever fix it again anyway classic firearms Also has a number of police trade-in guns that came in. I think this is something from whatever job or the bread of 92 showed up all over the place at the same time. Also some of the Glocks it seems like and looks like even the same department markings. Could be what it is what I mean by that is when you look at the pictures you'll notice if you pay attention and bring up the photos you can actually see where they came from you know who was carrying them. However the problem with that is that a lot of times everybody uses the same promo picture because they got it from the same source and they just shoot them a picture and they don't have to re-photograph anything. Now Classic does do a bunch of videos, by the way, so if you go over to YouTube, you can see whatever they're unboxing this week, or, again, progressively through the week. So there could be other things that they post. Also, Atlantic firearms may or may not have any of the SKS as we mentioned those in the tour block, but again, they're not $56 apiece those days are long gone. But, they are available over Atlantic firearms and you might want to check them out. They also come and go with the 7.62x39 Yugoslavian brass case, per damn primed, in stripper clips. If you're going to, if you have a bunch of SKS's, and especially if you've kept them original, one of the best ways to get regular military factory grade SKS stripper clips is to buy the Yugo ammo. It's just a given part of the expense, okay? It's just that simple. That's what you're doing. That's part of the cost of why it's, you know, a chunk of change more. You're getting the stripper clips you need so that you can speed load the weapon that you have a little faster. And you're getting a good product also. The U-Go's don't do any junk. And in fact, they were the rental revolution country to go for for small arms and heavy weapons for a very long time. And still are, you know, what you're looking for. Also, let's see, somebody asked in the meantime, I couldn't go through very many emails, can't where I am here, but I did get something about 7.60x54R. I have not seen any of the cans, but if they are out there, I'll tell you again, Atlantic Firearms sometimes gets the spam cans, but they also do get the Wolf in 7.62x54R, both ball and soft point, and you may also find it over at AIM Surplus right now with Premium Cartesan, PPU 7.62x54R White Box. Oh, it's been three weeks now, but the guys took it out on the range with the Romanian knockoff of the SPD. And that PPU ammunition, military grade, for the 760x54R, that is a tack driving load. They bagged those rifles and wanted to see what it would do, 50, 100, 150, 200, went right out to 700 yards, and they were getting good print. Nothing fancy about the rifle. It's again the knockoff of the dragon offs that the Romanians made there for the longest time. They were using Russian optics. They were not using any modified or improved American or Euro optics. So again, the guns performed as expected, but the ammunition is very, very clean also. Again, which we find typical for PPU ammo. So it wasn't dirty, it wasn't dusty. What I mean by that is it wasn't like you're firing a muzzleloader. Smoke cloud, okay. And not only that, but again, uniform print for the ball. I don't know if they fired any of the soft point, which is in the blue box for the PPU. So you might want to go to AIM surplus if you're looking for 7.60x54R. Certainly everybody else may have some in stock, so you have to shop around, see what is the best price. But yeah, we've been pretty good with AIM and the PPU. Basically, I guess you would call it marksman's grade. It's not sniper grade or competition grade, but it is a good printing ammunition, which means it'll do well on bipeds when the time comes. Or the quadruped robots, take your pick. And again, the 7.62x54R, good choice for having to go through material because it is an MBR, main battle rifle cartridge, not a light rifle cartridge. Don't make the mistake and confuse the two. They're not one and the same. So. Other stuff. Real quickly, I want to go through this. Number one, I've been watching all of the stuff. The states, of course, are now going apicrazy on the communist states, on going after the guns, etc. And if you really want to test them, if you really want to test your enemy and find out how they're going to go either into brain fart or how they're going to go frothing in the mouth crazier than they already are, let's all propose to get rid of the War Powers Act of 1933. Guys, if you do everything that they've done, Homeland, Succu-Ridey, all the other police state crap from 9-11, all the BS generated by the commies that are presently in power is dead. Get rid of, rescind, rescind, rescind, as in eradicate the War Powers Act of 1933 in its entirety. All the rest of this garbage is piled upon, it's like horse turds piled upon horse turds. Now the other half of this is get rid of the NFA Act of 1933-34. I know everybody says 34, but it didn't start in 34. In fact, 1933, they did this just like they did with the War Powers Act. They slid it in at night, added to it, and then in 34 they converged with all the rest of the BS to try and tax everybody out of their weapons or prevent anybody from owning anything. And the rest is history, as they say. And of course, the idea was to make life hodgepodge, irrelevant but miserable because of arbitrary enforcement and arbitrary interpretation, which is totally contrary to the body of the law of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence. And it's another reason we need to have a second American war for independence to shoot their ass out. Anyway, real quick on that note, you'll notice something that has disappeared from the conversation is trying to argue using the old court cases that were a favorite for anti-gun people. The Miller case is probably the best example. Now there's a reason that everybody wants the Miller case to just have you ever read the opinion of the court in the Miller case? Well, here's the thing, there are two. What? Well, here's a cute thing about the Miller case with the appeal, the appeal, the appeal, and going to the Supreme Court. You know, Miller won. And then he lost. Here he goes. What? Oh, you didn't know that. The Miller case that was, of course, having to do with the possession of a short barreled shotgun, was progressively went step by step through the courts, got to the high court very quickly, to be quite honest. It didn't take very long. by comparison to some other cases I've seen with far greater standing and but lesser appointment as they say in other words they didn't get to it. It's interesting that with the Miller case the judge ruled that the short shotgun Miller owned was illegal because it was not a martial militia type standard weapon aka a combat weapon. Final rule. Okay this was the What happened is the Miller case came to a head in the Supreme Court. Everybody goes well, I can't mess with the Supreme Court. Well FDR did. Basically, initially with the Miller case, they ruled in favor of Miller because all weapons are militia weapons. Well after about, I believe it was one full week, a business week plus a weekend, good old FDR waddled his ass basically through his representatives over to the Supreme Court. And they had them reintroduce the case back onto the floor and then restructure their final wording. Now the original argument, the original, forgive me, the original final ruling or final statement by and was collected by the court. Everybody pretty well agreed. Well, based upon, this is the first ruling. Based upon the idea that the American War for Independence and the founding of the nation any and all firearms were used in defense of our freedom and liberty and the creation of the country ergo all weapons are legitimate and it's not the government to say it is the people to say what is the appropriate arm for you know defending oneself or to participate in the militia Since the objective behind the militia element is that, theoretically, you're supposed to bring your own arm. If you did not have an arm because you don't have the wherewithal, you've gone into bankruptcy, you've lost all your property, your house burned down, then the government was supposed to provide at the local level a weapon so that you might be able to participate in combat and alongside other militiamen. So any weapon didn't make any difference what it was. However, after a week, and by the way, Miller didn't show up for the, this is why the whole thing flipped actually. Miller disappeared from the book, so to speak. He couldn't be found. So what happened is the FDR wandered down the Pennsylvania Avenue around the corner there. And what he did is he demanded that they change the ruling. So instead, they found Miller guilty based upon the NFA, 1934 NFA Act, because it was a short barrel shotgun. However, then they had to present an argument. And that is where in the Miller case, the judges ruled that the short shotgun, Miller owned, was illegal, not unlawful, illegal. because it was not a Marshal-Militia type standard weapon, aka a combat weapon. Now that's interesting because there was no criteria for that that could be accepted. There was the idea that if at all possible to raise the standard so that preferably everybody would be at a certain level of preparedness. But that wasn't necessarily true because of the means of an individual within the society. They may not have the money or see that they could spend the money on the arms when they might have to feed the family or something like that. The argument ran contrary to all of the writings of the founders and in fact, here's what's most important in the first part of the ruling that, the first ruling. It ran contrary to all of the actions of the founders. Actions speak louder than words. Did Billy Bob Joe show up at the skirmish line say at Saratoga with his favorite 45 caliber, you know bunny squirrel utility rifle? Yeah Did he perhaps kill British soldiers with him? Yeah Did it have a band-aid? No Was it a brand new weapon was a state-of-the-art best there was of it. No, it's what he had So Billy Bob showed up with his .45 caliber mountain rifle or his squirrel rifle, maybe a .40 caliber, could have been .38. There's all kinds of different guns made by blacksmiths back then, not just gun makers. Blacksmiths made as many guns as anybody else in this country back in the day. And whatever the blacksmith thought was, you know, his, you know, niche, whatever he could do the best at, once he found out it was marketable, he'd keep building them. That's how a lot of the gun companies came about. Starting out with a guy going, ping, ping, ping, heat it red hot, ping, ping, ping, okay, for me, stretch out that tube, but make that octagon barrel a reality. Congratulations, bore it, and et cetera, et cetera, and even do the furniture in the woods. Sometimes the second party did the furniture, by the way. But anyway, fact is that either way, here's the problem that they've got. Because the Miller case specifically stated that the short shotgun Miller owned was illegal because it was not a Marshall militia type standard weapon, AKA a combat arm. And this is from the Miller case. This is from another federal case that, well, wait a minute, if it's a Marshall type arm, because you gotta remember what's the latest flap yet from all these crazy as crazy as bed bug loons. Well, weapons of war in America. Well, as a matter of fact, even the leftist court, what it was told to change its decision had to acknowledge and come up with some way to disqualify the short barrel shotgun. To do that, it had to cite that, well, that's not a martial arm that the regular infantry or a regular militiamen would carry. And again, that is a lie because anything and everything is carried. And in fact, by the way, even when that happened, remember when, go back and look at when the Miller decision was made. Guys, we had just been in the Great War, which of course then we started numbering and only a few, what a few years later, we'd start numbering the wars. We had World War II coming right up. But in World War I, How many trench guns did the United States military buy? Short, barrel shotguns did the US government buy and put into combat with US troops? Now, let's not just count the Winchester 97. When we talk about trench guns, let's understand. In fact, let's put it this way. Even if the gun was relatively short, In many cases, depending upon what gun it was, and there were quite a few different weapons that were issued and stuff purchased from the French overseas, uh, okay, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, So, when the idiot sticks opened their face, they arbitrarily had to completely ignore the most recent, large-scale military action in which both the Germans, the French, the Italians, the English, the US, all fielded short-barreled 12-gauge shotguns under spec in most cases. as defense guns, carriage guns, trench sweepers, etc., etc., etc. See how this works? And that's why, if you'll notice, the Miller case has been just shut up because the talking point is, oh, you got these military style weapons? Well, I'm confirming to the US Supreme Court's demand that we have martial weapons in hand. And that those fully qualified are covered under the Article 2 of the Bill of Rights because they are militia arms to the nth degree. And the fact that they keep opening their face and saying that they are, reinforce to an even greater degree the entire argument for Miller in its second step. Now the first step is reinforced automatically. They said originally they agreed. No, there is no such thing as unofficial arm. Every arm, every weapon we have, if we had to shoot an invader, we wouldn't care what it was. We'd be shooting the invader with it. You see how that works? So it's asinine to try and cherry pick. You can't do that. But what about the rules of war? Well, like you said, Red Dawn, Ruhail, Geneva Convention. I ain't never heard of it. Now here's another interesting thing about the Miller case because again they needed to reinforce the Jewish mob, the kosher mafia, the communists running FDR needed to reinforce and attack private ownership of guns in face of the foreclosure on America through the War Powers Act. Destroy the War Powers Act by the way and it completely undermines the NFA Act at the same time. The NFA action is an extension of the War Powers Act for disarmament of a conquered people and a limitation because of a surrender. Just like the Treaty of Versailles. It stands in the exact same way and that's why the NFA law is there against where the Corporation of the United States declaring that it's waging war against the American people has declared victory, has declared that the population of the United States are property to be bartered, sold, traded or exchanged at the discretion of the federal government or the states respectively. The states became co-habitors in the foreclosure on America. 1933 War Powers Act is the declaration of that foreclosure. To take by force of arms and to declare war on the American people by the bureaucracy. Get rid of the 1933 War Powers Act and all these foreign terms have to be executed. Like Homeland Security in New Jersey, which is registered in New Jersey, not in Washington, D.C. in the District of Criminals. Why is Homeland Succuriety registered in New Jersey? as a private foreign entity, a foreign agent of a foreign power registered on American soil. That's Homeland Security and the Fusion Centers run by foreigners slash the globalists against the American sovereign. So, again, the Miller case. And what's really interesting is, by the way, there's a whole bunch of the original quotations of the Miller case whenever you see them, were always kept really narrow because of the political correctness of the NRA. When Neil Knox came in, remember the actual pro-gun patriot, Neil Knox made a point of also digging out of the archives. He already was in the NRA as a researcher, and he had done some phenomenal work which the NRA wouldn't print. because it was literally from court register. It was from the National Archives. And they, heaven forbid, that since the political correctness of what was going to become Lippi Eyre's regime, and remember, how long has Mr. Lippi Eyre been in there? Well, Mr. Lippi Eyre, his job was to destroy the work that was done, kind of like this Donald Trump argument with, you know, again, Biden. But Obama was before him. Okay, so there was another leftist in there. Knox of course stepped in bumped them all out and So for a period of time you had a little bit of fresh air But a whole bunch of information being spread out where it needed to be Okay Tell you what we're gonna spread something else up before we get to the bottom of the hour here and we should have our traditional bottom of the hour break for weapons Wednesday and It'll have it there for us in a minute This is my rifle. There are many like it, but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend. Without my... Shoots me! Before God! In our hands we'll prove no trifle You may ride a good lead speed You may not stern a master You forward march with speed But you'll learn to back the switch faster When you meet our mountain boys And they'll lead our journey start Glad you make what little noise And always hit the mark Oh the rifle Oh the rifle In our hands we'll prove no trifle Before that, even though this time. They tried not to pass on or post in depth to the duality of the court. First, ruling in favor of Miller, and then one week later, because they were told to by FDR, completely flipping and overturning their own ruling against Miller because of the political correctness agenda of the communist FDR. Okay, so just heads up on that one Also another thing don't forget and this is a you know, we have to get rid of all three We have to literally crush them. We need to get rid of the gold act in 1933 also Well, wait a minute mark we can have gold that doesn't mean they got rid of that. They got rid of the gold act the the gold confiscation edict of the horror the turd the piece of excrement FDR Franklin Delano Rosenfeld is still in place. And this is another situation where the gold ban, it's waiting in the wings. If they choose to try and go the whole gusto on this whole garbage with Castle Society, they will not have to reintroduce, they will simply by edict, reactivate the Gold Ban Act of 1933. So the triple that needs to be dead, needs to be gone, is an insult to the American people because it's an attack upon the American people, not any foreign entity. It's an attack upon the American people as the War Powers Act. It's why all these governors are sitting on their dead ass and not doing anything about the border. Why? What's real simple? They may give lip service to this craft bow, supposedly they're going to step forward. But because they are cohabitors of the War Powers Act of 1933, what happened is the governors mobilized in each state a select militia company, typically the governors own, and like the Michigan State Police, you're not supposed to know this, is a militia force that was mobilized as part of the War Powers Act of 1933 to support the governor in the foreclosure of the people of the state of Michigan. each one of your respective state police forces or whatever they want to call themselves that exist to that period of time, you will notice that there is a specific benchmark, and it's 1933 for each of the states, when there is a change in the construction of the state police force. Now, because of this, the other thing that they got out of the deal was they got a chunk of the booty. When they created the straw man, all of the straw man infrastructure was slid sideways in a percentage to be managed first by the states, just like other activities, and they're doing it with all this other crap, you see the same thing, where they get the states to go out there and be the front dummy for the Fed. The Fed becomes like the god papa behind the curtain, his hand comes out, he gets the bag of cash, and it slips back behind the scenes. The states They're not equity members, but they're obligated members because they have become corporate holders in the national corporation in the process of reconstruction, combination of the War Powers Act, and don't forget the Buck Act of 1938. The Buck Act of 1938. Now between those two constructions, this is why many things froze at the federal level and never changed for what, 100 years now? It's getting on that, well 90 some years. It's interesting, the prison systems, because they completely altered the prison system and created a separate prison bond on the straw man, your person, your entity. You surrender yourself to the prison as a piece of chattel property. You sign off on it and they create, through a special branch of the straw man construction of the world bond system, they create a prison bond that they know is of a set value because they've already been told how long they can hold you. So they actually know from beginning to end with the actual date of the construction of the bond is, even if you get a parole, your exit date is still the same. So, the reason these states aren't going to come off on this, this is why Texas is a laugh right now, because they know what they need to do legitimately, they're being invaded, everybody's starting to talk about it, but they aren't stepping up to the plate and here's why. They got big government tits sitting in front of them. Federal share the scam tits. Federal steal from America. Moo! That, in fact, that tit off the left is, you know, offering Orange Crush. Oh, wow. Special deal. And the fact is that everybody knows it. There's only 50 governors and there's only a couple of territories. The territories, which is interesting on this, typically have done a better job of protecting your rights than your state governors have. In fact, let me re jog your memory on something. Do you remember when they tried to slide the gun confiscation laws under Obama? Do you remember how they tried to do it and they tried to do it through federal edict authority? Let me see if anybody remembers. Do you remember what Obama tried to do? Okay, well, wait a minute. Hold on. Is anybody remember? I give you a big hint. It doesn't have anything to do with the states. It has to do with, oh, let's give you a little hint here, the federally regulated territories. What? Well the territories, well they're territories, but they're federally regulated. You better read the Constitution. Until such time as the state can be constructed or is actually brought forward through and there is a standard construction for creating a state, what, you know, what petitions need to be addressed and how you need to construct your internal government, etc., etc. Well, guess what? The territories are not the states. They are regulated directly by Washington, D.C. and the Fed. Ergo any laws that can be implemented there. Ex post facto, in fact, in any construction, once they are levied and they're locked in place, they then, through the Buck Act of 1933, are saran wrapped across the rest of the country arbitrarily and automatically. They may or may not, an arbitrary in that, they may or may not disclose, which is what Obama knew and was trying to do with Guam. And you might recall that the only reason that they didn't get gun confiscation through under Obama is because of a female judge, a woman, who was in Guam, who was the residing federal judge who was overseeing the case. And by God, she actually put the brakes on the whole damn thing. One woman, right place, right court. Hey, boy. when he was in power. Don't worry, I got it covered. We got this end run program thing going. Well, the end run was to go through the territory at the federal level and circumvent all of this. Go ahead, color, jump in there, please. Yeah, the Congress, what they've been doing here as of late, regardless of what Obama tried to do, is exercise plenary power. over the people in the several states. And the plenary power was only given to them in, as you said, the territories. And plenary power, people, is kind of like monarchal power. That's all I got to say, Mike. Well, actually that's exactly the case because the territories have not been subdivided. The territory has not been either acknowledged in whole or subdivided as an acknowledged member state. You have to go through the process of becoming a state to become part of the contract of the foundational construction, which is the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. You're obligated to conform to all of the same edicts, regulations, and laws as all of the other member states if you become a state. And that's why, again, remember this whole thing about how, well, they don't need to listen to the Second Amendment. Well, here's how it works. In order for you to become a state, You have to acknowledge all of the constructs of the foundation of the country, which includes both the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and certainly the Declaration of Independence. But you also have to acknowledge all the foundational instruments, including and even the Articles of Confederation and the pre-Articles of Confederation. What you are doing is you want to be a member of the club. To be a member of the club, you've got to have the right suit. You don't have the tie, don't have the suit, aren't properly dressed, you are a member of the club. Now, there are protections because of that, and the mutual liberty interests especially are enticing and desirable. But, uh, now, it doesn't mean that in the territory you don't have protections. But the problem is you have a greater variance in arbitrary and capricious activity on the part of the federal agency, and that is, has Aegis has control over you, is overseeing you. And this is where it is amazing that this judge, and forgive me, I have her name written down, I've got it in file. I've got it in notes. But the thing is, can't recall her name, can be easily dug up. But she actually is the one who fired the flare, brought it to everybody's attention. Hey, had this gone through, it was only weeks away from being a general gun ban. They were able to implement it with the territory they thought. But the judge blocked it at the territorial level. A year ago, it did not immediately jump into action as a viable mechanism for the rest of the country. And again, it would have circumvented the Supreme Court. That was the idea. So this is Mr. Stuff that these characters play. And it's every oblique you can imagine trying to come at you on the sly from the side and catch you off guard. That's that's the norm not the exception guys and that's why everybody needs to be prepared for and to deal with These problems as the horizon right now Again, let's get on the track. You know everyone goes. Well, why aren't we we're all complaining I don't always complain about stuff because we have to have solutions and You want to see him you want to see the old bung holes start to you know, the old sphincter tighten up with the regime Go after the war powers act If you go after the War Powers Act, all of the rest of the garbage from 9-11 is dead. The Patriot Act is gone in one sweep. Everything, all of the branches leading from the Corps are dead. And after all, why do we need the War Powers Act? That's 1933. That's old law. And how does it apply today? I know why it applies today because it has to do with the foreclosure on America. But you're not supposed to know that and they don't teach you anything about it. They don't want to talk about it because then you'd have to, they might have to answer more questions, which they won't. If they can help it, they'll try to distract everybody. So again, start writing this up everywhere. Just do little pops in all the social media. It is time to get rid of the War Powers Act of 1933. Post that just as a simple banner everywhere that you can. Make it echo through the machine. If we get rid of the War Powers Act and we get rid of the NFA Act of 1933-34 and we get rid of the Gold Act, which all they've done is alleviated pressure, but with still full regulation on tracking and tracing. In other words, so that they have the ability to what? Add their discretion, try to claim that they're gonna take your gold from you. Of course, they also now are talking, hell, even the wipe your FRN paper. We're gonna take that. Well, of course, you're right. Of course, if you don't have that you just have digits They've already told you they're gonna take that and in Canada They did and it wasn't 30 40 50 or 60 years ago or 70 That was this year and last year They did Oh prior pepper planting prevents piss poor performance. We go on the offensive There's a place where you can go on the offensive and start with words the War Powers Act of 1933 needs to be gone Now, another thing, the border, and again, we've got a little bit of time here. It is inevitable that one state or another, well, I shouldn't say inevitable, because they've fiddle-farted at this before. What year is this? This is 2022. You know that for as long as I've been doing radio, we have been watching and talking about the border, and time and again, every time a physical barrier and actual enforcement of the sovereignty of the nation is initiated. It started not once has it ever been finished. Came to something like that goes all the way back to Eisenhower and the Eisenhower administration when they deported tons and tons of the buggers. In fact, I would point out 1957, 1958, we had a little bit of a depression. They didn't use the word recession back then. There was no such word. When you hear the word recession, scratch that R stuff out, it's actually G depression. Before the Great Depression, there were three little depressions between World War I and the big one in 29. Each one orchestrated by the same people in the stock market and the international Shister bankers, who by the way didn't exist in this country before 1913, in the manipulative way that they would after 1913, which led to the 1929 collapse. So, one of the other things that we need to be looking at is a Minuteman 3 program. We already had Minuteman 1, we already had Minuteman 2. Perhaps this time, everybody's got government checks, they can get money for gas, we have resources and manpower. Again, feedback, it would be interesting. Logistics issue we're not hard to deal with. We have a whole lot of Americans who are tired of what they're seeing. It would not be difficult to deploy much in the same way. By the way, the threat from the cartel today is no different from the threat from the cartels back in the 90s when this was done. And the Minuteman I program shut down the entire 30 days. At the end of that 30 days, the coyote and other activities started to work back up. However, a second deployment by the population, Minuteman II, was planned and executed effectively. Once again, for the 30 days, shutting down the border. Hold on, caller, real quick. We even had aircraft in the air. We had night vision. We had thermal. And nobody crossed the border. Nobody could get across the border. They were seen before they got there. So the feds are already there to pick them up, haul them back down the road, throw them back over the fence. Go ahead, caller. Jump in there, please. Hey, this is Carl in Virginia. Did you see the video they've been playing of this like 74 minutes or so? The ugaldi shooting but the cops just standing there in the hallway doing absolutely nothing. Oh, did they release arrest of it? They've only done pieces. I haven't seen the whole they put out. I believe it. Yeah, they put out a highly edited part of it. But at one point, one of the cops walks across the hallway to hand sanitizer dispenser and sanitizes his hand. I mean, you can't make this stuff up, it's absolutely ridiculous. Because- Because- You're supposed to trust these guys to do their job and they refuse to. And if they were legitimately afraid- Well, they wouldn't be walking across the hallway to... and sanitizing his hands. He's more afraid of the germs than he is the shooter. So you know they've got to do that stand-down order. He's got more concern for the germs on his hands than the children and the teachers that are bleeding to death behind the door. Yep. That's pretty disgusting in and of itself. And they edited out all the children screaming in the video. You could hear the shots firing stuff, but somehow they channel track the screaming children out of the video. It's what it says. Yeah. Well, you could do that. No, yeah. That's anybody who's listening. It's been done. Our video editing. Yes. In fact, depending on how many tracks you pull, you can take any sound out of the out of it you want. So the children screaming and of course, probably, you know, begging for help, etc. Which, by the way, the help was just beyond that door and it would stay right there. Now this is why we do not count on the government for anything. This is where the problem has been. When they can give you anything, they can take anything away. And including, well, they can just sit on their hands and watch them bleed to death. And if they had their way, see, here's the problem. That's the one direction. The other direction, which we can show you time and again, if they could, they'd beat you to death or shoot you in the street, stand there and watch you bleed to death or die by inches, not let the ambulance crew come near you because they're playing Judge Dredd and the commies are going to give them god power so they can be Judge Dredd in America. Just like communist Chinese on the streets over there where they can send you to the gulags by walking up and putting their hand on your shoulder for three years. What's the death set? Call or ship in there. Yeah, Mark. Sorry. Early today, I watched a video with the mother who went in and got her kids. There was a YouTube and she told how it happened and how afterwards the old cops have been spying on her and harassing her. Apparently not wanting her to talk about how cowardly they were. I guess it's no surprise, but it is. But it does point out even more how shameful those cowards are. That's all. Well, you know what? There's so many videos on YouTube obviously, and one of the things that gets me into a guy's backyard, it's got a high fence. Dogs in the fence. There's no doubt the dogs are... What if Scott the cop? Well, hold on, he owns the animal. And meanwhile the cops have disappeared. Well, what happens is he calls, you know, the cops are gonna, you know, show up. And there's three or four of them there, and he's videotaping. And you just tell. They're like, well, what are you gonna do? You know, well, you know, they had to shoot your dog. Why did they have to shoot the dog? Why the dog was, it's obvious common logic. The dog, is the dog barking at anybody in the yard? No. The dog is barking at the cop, who is of course then jumping over the fence. Well, if there was anybody else in the backyard, common sense of dictate that Fido, who's a pretty good sized dog, would probably have a chunk of their ass. Okay? So the dimwit shoe size IQ idiot stick, you know, righted up numb nut with the, you know, no neck. It, of course, kills the guy's dog, but he's not around. Oh, no, the owner is like, you know, where the hell is he? Well, there's these other three punks that show up, and what's their job? Well, their job is to kind of indirectly threaten the property owner. And it's like, well, you know, that's why if I saw you bleeding in the street, you think I'm gonna walk across and do anything? I wouldn't want to risk myself for getting the way of your professionalism. How that works. See, I can work both ways. Because how many, you can find, well of course many of them have taken off because the leftists like this, even though they'll tell you they want to defund the cops, they want to be in charge of the cops and they can use the cops to execute Americans. The cops who should know better, in fact they do, still side with the commies because they think they're getting, and they do, get temporary power. But it is always inevitable that the idiot sticks eventually are thrown into the ditch with all the others they help to kill. And they scream and thrash every step of the way about how they had a deal, or they followed orders, or they were special. And why are you doing this to me? Well, because they have other pet puppies that were always going to replace you, jackass. That's why. But in the meantime, that's the kind of stuff that you see. Well, the latest, okay, the video, it's inevitable that as the court proceeds, instead of the selective image, you're going to get the full image of everything that happened. Now, I will say this again before you ever hand your phone to the cops. or anyone. You dump anything that you recorded that we don't dump into another source. You send to your home computer, shoot to every friend that you can as a save, send it physically to them so there is another copy somewhere. Why? They want all the cell phones so they can do exactly what you saw with Yavaldi and edit and correct and change the reality. In fact, as you saw right from the get-go, minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day, look at how on its head the entire story turned. Do you think that this is the first case like this? It's just like what happened. You know, they keep mentioning, you know, the Columbine shooting, and I'll remind everybody again, guys, they acted the same way there and stood on their dead ass and did nothing. And on top of that, we're laughing their asses off. They were shucking, jiving, laughing. Meanwhile, there was gunshots going on in the school. Oh, and then they were threatening any kid trying to come out. You know, they're all puffed up about pointing guns at the victims. But by God, they didn't do anything for the victims. And that's not the only case like that, but that's one where I'll never forget. It was the classic Bill Clinton scenario. There's this big long, it was a rectangular parking lot. You're looking at it down the length of it. Both sides are open except for tactical vehicles that have pulled in. There's five SWAT teams on the left, five SWAT teams on the right. They're tactically dispersed in groups all the way to the other end of the parking lot. This female comes around the corner with another guy and they're laughing and chucking and laughing and chucking and laughing. And I mean like she's throwing her head back and laughing. And as they get about a third of the way down from the end of the parking lot towards where the camera is, you can see her look right at the camera. And all of a sudden she puts her head down and she puts her finger in her eye and she's like, oh, no. Just like Bill Clinton at Ron Brown's funeral. It's well split, always shining the straw