Mark Koernke discussed media manipulation and propaganda techniques, analyzing how low-quality video feeds and staged imagery are used to control narratives. He examined the BBC's premature announcement of Building 7's collapse on 9/11, the Oklahoma City bombing's missing surveillance footage, and the Pentagon's unreleased camera footage. Koernke emphasized the importance of independent documentation using affordable digital cameras and micro-television broadcasting as alternatives to mainstream media. He also discussed preparedness topics including ammunition storage, powder procurement from Palmetto State Armory, and the physics problems with exoskeleton and robotic warfare concepts, arguing that low-tech resistance methods remain effective against centralized systems.
Thanks for listening to Live 365. Our valued supporters know us well for our large selection of musical genres at the click of a mouse. But did you know you can now take the music with you on your smartphone? Learn more at Live365.com slash smartphone. Live 365. As Iowoki vanished in the mist for once he came. His words were true. We are not free, but we have ourselves to blame. For even now as tyrants trample each God given right we only watch in tremble too afraid to stand and fight If he stood by your bedside in a dream while you were asleep and wondered what remains of the freedoms he fought to keep What would be your answer if he called out from the grave? This distilled the land of the free and home And good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, this is the second hour of the afternoon in intelligence report. I'm Mark Kornke. One day. As I'm hanging in there, this is Butterknife. There we go. One day closer to victory for all of our brothers and sisters, both on and behind the lines in occupied territories northwest, west, southwest, and east. Well, ladies and gentlemen, you were listening to us on... LibertyTreeRadio.4MG.com, Indiana Freedom Talk Radio.com. We are on AM&FM micro stations, CB base stations, and Ultra Net Technologies east and west of the Mississippi along with Alaska. We're an all-mark network from the top of Maine to the bottom of Florida. From the bottom of Florida across the arc of the Gulf of Mexico, headed Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, Oklahoma, Big Junk of Nebraska, a whole bunch of Wyoming to include both 3rd and 5th pit and the nine sisters on the west side of the state. Well, actually the left side. Also Colorado, we're waving to our friends in the great state of Jefferson out there on the far left coast. We turn back to the east, we cross the plains, leap over the Mississippi and land on the Smokies. With the restaurant crews, Grandma teams, OK teams, and the Ma Bell, Grandma Consortium, bringing us the Golden Spike, the nine The niner date is coming up here for everybody. Actually, it's sooner than that. Four are three grandmas in Cleveland. They're all still with us and quite strong now. One of the girls was in the hospital a month and a half ago. A little over a month and a half ago now. And back out, it was a safety thing. Don't need any of that pneumonia problem setting in with anyone, so they took care of that. We're going to have a little celebration here coming up. in the next six, seven days. I'll have more on that and I think they're going to be asking for some people to stop by. So we might even be over there visiting and doing the program from that direction. Anyway, we got BK here. I'll benchmark the date. 29 May, it is the sixth year of Open Fabian Socialist and Soviet Socialist Occupation of America with a K2014 Old Earth Calendar. BK, real quick, another thing, guys, Palmetto State Armory, guys, PalmettoStateArmory.com, PalmettoStateArmory.com, PalmettoStateArmory.com has been getting odds and ends of powders in it, I get a little flash here from somebody on that, but like you said, quick as everybody finds out, it's obvious that the land is barren, you know, tumbleweeds. in that when it shows up it's there for a day or two and gone so whatever allocation they're getting or however much they're getting you're going to want to spot check your regular powder stations like that go through and see what they have another thing is dies I don't think anybody's really, I don't think they have because we've seen them sold 7.62x54R dies buy them now If you have got a bunch of 7.62x54R guns, buy them now. The other thing, the preview part is on. They've got that Boxer Prime, beautiful fresh 7.62x54R. That's your foundation. You can still do the Berdan Prime and everything else, guys. There are all kinds of tricks we've talked about. But right now, Palmetto State Armory and their other companies, Powder, is one of the high priorities for storage. When you get the containers, buy yourself some 20mm cans or 50 cal cans or some of the 50 beeps which are actually 40mm grenade cans. And can the powder, put it inside another container, this is a safety issue, environmental control is the issue with powder always. Go ahead BK, you had more please. Yeah, I had one other thing. There was an interesting item in the corporate news yesterday and that was that reporters were treated to a closed circuit video observation of a trial or a hearing or some sort of proceeding. against one of the masterminds of the USS Cole bombing. Now, first off, there have been a, I don't know, I've lost track, but there must have been at least a half dozen different people that the feds have all accused of being the mastermind of the Cole bombing. So that's sort of the general purpose thing. You pointed anybody you want and you know which, and everybody pounces on them. So that's sort of the That's the generic recipe the feds are using nowadays. Anybody they don't like, they point at them and say they were the mastermind of the coal bombing. That's getting to be a little bit comical. They supposedly were running live video feed from a super secret trial room someplace buried in the depths of Fort Meade where there's all sorts of secrecy and security and blah, blah, blah. And the press was allowed to observe by video only. Well, even the RT guys, for instance, that mentioned this, didn't make an obvious point. And I'll throw out this obvious point just so that it gets out into the mind space. If somebody shows you video and says, this is live, how do you know? If they say, this is from Fort Meade, how do you know? If they say, this is so and so, and all you're seeing are images on a screen, how do you know? That could be produced in Hollywood. It could be actors for all you know. It could be real time and it could be 6 months ago or 5 years ago. You wouldn't know unless you can interact with it and tap on the screen and say, hey you, touch your left ear please with your index finger and they do it. You can't even tell if that's live let alone who it is or where it is or any other such thing. All of these credulous reporters are taking their word for it that this is who this is, this is what's going on, this is the location, this is such and such. We are disappearing so deeply down into the twilight zone that people are just starting to take the most ridiculous federal proclamations at face value i would point out that if somebody shows you video and so on you don't even know uh... who where what when how why it's better any of those question words about what's going on you don't even know if it's live you don't even know if it's actors So, if they think that, oh, we're going to show somebody a video and that meets the requirement that a public trial be public, well, I'm sorry. Let me inject the concept into the collective brains of however many people are listening. You don't even know if that's for real. In fact, that's one of the things that's amazing. We got this conversation yesterday. with somebody else about well have you noticed how the fuzzier the image the more likely it's a lie or the more obscured and obstructed the image to begin with. Well, they know that details are available to nitpickers if they examine it and they peer around in some corner and they see a California license plate that that might not really be a rack, you know, whatever the case may be. The bus driving by one person and then driving by the other with the same advertisement and the same pedestrian in the background. Let's not forget that CNN special report, right? Yeah, or the same cloud passes over one of them and the same cloud seems to pass over the other one at the same time, you know. Exactly. Well, one of the things that I've... It's interesting, Desert Dust 1, still the best example. Okay, the propaganda had now, remember some of that was so clean because it was staged in studio, period, right? Right. They've already demonstrated that and some people admitted, oh yeah, yeah, it turns out. Well still, the field footage was actually quite clear. And so it was very easy to make out details. And that in and of itself was a validator with regard to the troops in the field. People said, oh yeah, that's me right there. And we were doing this, this and this. Desert Dust 2 becomes the shaky camera to create urgency fiasco. and poor quality. I mean we went in 20 years of invasion and wasting of American resources. Apparently we stopped spending money on telecommunications. The quality of the imagery goes into the toilet, the focus and the emphasis on detail and perception disappear. Well that's not an accident because that's part of the classic examples of how propaganda work. Well, you see that in the very early 80s when CNN was young and people like me really loved it and you could watch that all the time and see all kinds of interesting stuff. What people didn't realize is that the way they got that live video feed is they had a whole truck full of satellite equipment and everything in that area. What they're doing now is they're running these guys around with little handheld satellite phones. And, of course, those work by heavy digital compression. The advantage is that it's a lightweight, handheld thing. The sidebar is that they have cut their budget for people in the field down to the point of, you know, you get a talking head and his reporter and his cameraman and a local interpreter and they're worried about their transportation costs and hotel bills. You know, they have loaded up the central office to so much overhead to the point that their actual field operations are running on a shoestring and it could very well be that the entire organization is functioning on very little revenues because there just aren't all that many people watching them anymore. So, you know, while the technology advances and the video quality degrades, what's going on is that you are seeing many, many, many orders of magnitude of cost reduction at the far end, but they've pushed the cost reduction to the point that, you know, a high schooler with a camcorder would be generating better images at the expense of transmitting it non-real time. And one of the other things that was comical, they were just discussing this with two of the other industry, both magazine and television production, that they're looking at possible closure because, well, people aren't watching. Well, why are people not watching? See, that's the first thing. It's like, how about the idea that pretty well everybody is seeing through your facade in one form or another, and they have no interest in the buffoonery. In other words, why watch you? There's no confidence. in your process. Exactly. Well, Ed, the Mesmer box isn't working the way they thought. And because of it, the budgeting isn't there. The money isn't there if you don't produce a product that people have considered desirable or useful. I mean, it's entertainment to a degree, but that isn't going to last very long. I mean, especially when it's obvious that it's the same regurgitated PAP over and over again. In the past, probably the best example, like you said, when CNN first came out, let's jog everybody's memory. Instantly, we're going to go to a location. The locations, the quality of the imagery, again the detailed information that was brought forward was instantaneous. But that also was a problem if you're the government and you're trying to create a condition and you want to manipulate it because you then have to re-engineer through tweaking the, you know, through the editors at whatever service, in this case CNN, and the problem you've got is a high quality and performance of the imagery too that can be used as evidence against you, which is what everybody, you know, everybody have been doing. The 80s at least saw more of a, you know, less of a concern about immediately modifying the image i think probably the best example one that everybody might remember the guy with the supposedly bomb van at the base of the washington monument guys remember that and the fact that CNN was able to jump on the ground there first and they had feeds from every direction and they had close-ups of the guy with the motorcycle helmet and everybody was terrified and they were waiting for a CG image of the exploding bomb at the base of the Washington Monument. Well, it turned out of course that they busted the guy, ransacked everything and basically he had a really nice motorcycle helmet, a really great jumpsuit and an empty van. But it still didn't mean he wasn't shot to death. However, lots of angst and a great way to get everybody to focus on a location while other things were going on. So even that could serve its purpose. Remember again, a deflection like that energizes and moves the eye away from what could be something else you don't want people to look at. Well, the other thing to bear in mind is that not everything on the planet occurs during U.S. prime time television hours. Exactly. And stuff happens in the middle of the night, and if CNN is running around and they have news crews in the Middle East and South America and other places and so on, and they just jump on the air whenever they get something, That requires an awful lot of sensors being embedded 24-7. You'll remember the incident of that ATF hit squad being annihilated and the story going out two and a half times before it was spiked. I believe that that was the watershed. This was the point at which suddenly weekend news cycle became completely boring. Because, in my opinion, the reason for that is that the government censors don't work seven days. They work five days a week and when they're not there, nothing new is allowed to go out because they got burned a couple of times. Exactly. Well, one of the interesting things about this too is the transition period between Desert Dust 1 and Desert Dust 2 We have a number of events that actually transfer the energy and in fact give us the ability with alternate communications to overtake in several areas. And that in and of itself because as we pointed out we used these feeds or these technologies that they were impressing, that they were pressing into service and utilizing upon the population. We were actually able to use it as a training aid. This created other problems too. And of course then modifications and improvements in internet activity with regard to going from just digital text to a certain amount of video, a certain amount of imagery, obviously from the get-go, then video imagery, then combine that with effective audio and video, etc., etc. So we overtook them to a degree with basically the equivalent to pikes and bayonets versus the available space-age technology that they were using through the same time period. If you don't have to be real time, If you can take 20 minutes to upload 5 minutes of video, then an awful lot of constraints are released and you can do a lot of good high quality and you can run the quality up and you can run the cost down to almost nothing. If you just release that one constraint of real time, then all sorts of other constraints loosen up. So, this is why a kid with a 1980s camcorder and a decent video capture card in a PC can produce something better than the live feeds available now to the big news organizations. If you don't mind running a capture and a compression and an upload and taking an hour or two to transmit 10 minutes worth of video, you can do it with cheap old technology and you can do it higher quality than the real-time guys. Exactly one of the things that we got into here just a short time ago, what we were discussing is micro television. Back when the transition, when the networks, or especially CNN, were very useful as the Sovietized tool, one of the things that we were looking at, just as we've been effectively using micro FM, was micro television. And I had discussions with people, there are five little guys around the country, each one is actually a different point of the compass. Two or three of them flat out said, man, do you know when you started talking about that? the ripple of fear that went through the system because they knew full well that you know, Gorilla, low tech Gorilla in every category defeats beast centralization every time. Well that's the whack-a-mole game. The whole idea of the player with the big hammers gets completely exhausted and frantic trying to knock out all little moles as they pop up here and there. And the next step is, well, we kind of went past because we, I personally believe we should still be putting up micro-analog television. And I'm serious about that. I got this discussion with one of our radio geeks two days ago. It's available. And one of the things that's funny is, don't get rid of your old televisions. I keep trying to tell people this. Guys, you have a complete system already proven out in the latest and greatest of its technology that's now free. Literally, you can go in and walk into restores or into resale shops and they have big screen, multi-vision, multi-sound system, conventional, older tube televisions. some of the best quality technology ever built in its category? Well, for the price of about $480 to $500, you do realize you could have a micro television station locally that would be received with flawlessly by every one of those pieces of equipment? Maybe even cheaper than that. At a recent auction, I picked up just because I couldn't resist. I spent about five and a half dollars each. I got a pair of RF modulators that are the style that hotels and security operations and so on use. So they're 19 inch rack units and they're only about an inch tall and a couple inches deep. Right. But they are not only very high quality, they do the same thing as the little throw a switch for channel three versus channel four devices that we used to have. But they are very high quality and you can tune the frequency to almost anything in the old broadcast range. And that's what hotels used to use for little pay channels and things of this sort. Well, for five and a half bucks I got a couple of these guys that are brand new. That is basically a television station with the exception of the power transmitter. All and all that's required. It's purely matter how much energy you want to put through the system and whether or not you want to stack the exciters. It works the same basically as FM with regard to expanding the broadcast potential. Now the thing is, think about it, how many places do you have where, man, I can't get anything. Just like what they're doing in Wyoming. They're picking valleys where nobody has any signal for anything right now, guys. And people are listening because guess what, I joke but I'm not. You can turn on their radio and use your car radio. And hear something local and you're hearing the micro effect all day and all night in the process. Think about that. The same thing can be done with television and the idea behind it is remember what do you put up there. What's purely a matter of how motivated you get. And to be quite honest, common sense and dictate, it should be a Patriot Channel. Now, you plug in all your favorite cool stuff that you know is Patriot-oriented, and you can be reinforcing and reinforcing and reinforcing and reinforcing our position. I think probably the best example of where we've changed, you know, changed things so dramatically, but we need to go the next step. We need Patriot wood. We've got too many irons in the fire. I really need pressure taken off of certain things that I've been forced to do. Seriously, the Bundy Ranch thing, we need more help with this. I got this conversation last week. Guys, if we can get pressure off in one direction, we can focus in other directions. The bad guys know this too. But we have to share time simply because of the nature of the battlefield and how many different projects need to be accomplished. And they have to be done at the personal end. But if we were able to free up and get people motivated where they need to be, and some people are, I've got guys listening right now that are musicians that are also doing some really cool videos right now. And they're playing with CG packages. They bought graphic packages. Some of the stuff that's going to be coming out, they're going to throw it on YouTube and also put it out there so it's in the venue where the Patriots can access it. Well, that's the kind of work that everybody needs to be doing. Pick it up. Don't worry about whether or not it's perfect right now. We need volume. We need it so that when you turn into something like this, what you're hearing is ours, what you're watching, like that little station like BK's talking about, there's no reason for it not to 100% promote our agenda. Period. No acquiescence, no kind of having to fill in with somebody else's junk from, you know, Hollywood or whatever. There's no reason for that. Think about it this way. There's a lot to be done. How many people out there have never seen any of the large number of well done 9-11 videos? There's a huge number. Old family over there. They haven't seen basic stuff that we take for granted like, you know, Loose Change, Second Edition is the best edition. The third one was Poisoned. uh... uh... in plain sight uh... nine eleven mysteries uh... you know there there are a lot of really well-done ones how many people out there have not actually seen that uh... you you could actually make some inroads in just that area and i'm going to go ahead and make that video building ten here's a lot of lines wrote that quick You mean building seven? Building seven? Yeah, exactly. It's like the John F. Kennedy to film back and to the left. Back and to the left. Hey, in this case, it's look over her shoulder. Back and to the left. Wow, that's the building she's talking about. Yeah, move her to the... Move her to get in front of it. Move her to get in front of it. and she kept moving to get out of the way because she's trying to center herself she's mentally centering herself for the camera actually actually i've i've watched that uh... bbc clip this is the one where uh... they they were announcing that building seven had fallen and it hadn't gone down yet uh... i am uh... willing to cut the presenter a little bit of slack the woman that was on on the television in front if you actually watch it critically with that in mind I don't think she knew what was going on. No, she didn't. No, no, she was... All she's doing is centering on the camera. She's not paying attention what's behind her. When the camera's moving, she's doing what she's supposed to do. She didn't know the thing about Building 7 going down. She kind of went along with the talking head at the desk who was pushing that doctrine. If you watch it again carefully, it's pretty clear that she had no idea what was going on. And they were screwing up at the main desk. They were getting things out of sequence. She hadn't even been told that Building 7 was down or was going to be down or whatever. She's just, you know, mattering on and putting in fill and all this kind of good stuff. And then the people at the desk are the ones that screwed up the schedule. So, you know, they make fun of the poor woman in front of the camera, but she's not actually the thinker in that one. No, when they're telling the camera to move to try and put her in front of the building, one of the cool things is that because of her training, she keeps trying to re-center based upon mental processes. She knows that I'm supposed to be here, I'm the pretty face, I'm supposed to draw your attention, I'm passing out the information. But she's also posturing the way she's supposed to because she's supposed to present specific postures, silhouette, and present and structure. And that's what she did, but because of it, the cameraman has to keep trying to slide because he's being told by the ones in the booth who realize they've mucked up. and that's where the problem is is that the girls doing your job she's like oh god with the hell well i'm not going back for this this is my right why is this guy drifting on you know i've got a recenter but you know it is uh... quite clear to me watching that in retrospect with this in mind that she didn't know what the heck they were doing and was not clued in and is not one of the thinkers in on the scam those are you know you've got to keep your job focus on her and give her a hard time but that she's not not the guilty one there She's just doing her job trying to keep her job and doesn't want to hear somebody say later that was your big moment and you failed. She's like, I know what to do. Well, I know what to do. What the hell's wrong with this fool? I know what to do. You guys familiar with the film on Missing Links? Yes. Yeah. That's a very good history of Zionist Jewish machinations. And that's where again, like I said, this is all stuff that, you know, the people when they when they where they see it from and consider this a conditioned mechanism because The view screen on our computers serves as an extension and overlap from the same process because we're all video conditioned. We're all old enough. Hell, there's not a time in this last century when we haven't had a television screen available to us in our lifetime. Not any of the people listening here except for maybe you that might be in your 70s and even then, this is the year 2014, you may not have had a television in your home but they were already in the community and then already in the beer halls. Well, what's more, the movie theater was the television that stayed starting in the 30s. That's why the feature changed every week and the news reels were up. We've got another caller. Who do we have? Jump in there quick. George in Texas. I know I watched the noble lie of Oklahoma City. But Mark, I know you talked about you have on C-Band feed a U.S. military going into the TV station to control the... They were... They were going in. They were already there. They were there before 7 o'clock in the morning. Yeah, they were pre-positioned on Murrow Day. Yeah, they were virtually every ABC, NBC, CBS, and the CNN Extension office, which by the way is some of their affiliates back in that day, All of their feeds which were being monitored by our satellite pirates, why they weren't pirates, because this is all open feed. None of this was encrypted, guys. They just run the feeds right through the... Back then it was mostly C. Today they used both C and KU band. But if you were monitoring those, you watched... As these guys were walking through the studios in pairs with M16s and Beretta pistols, all in battle dress uniform, already kitted out either with helmet or with helmets and soft caps. And they were all through the system. Is there a video watch of that building coming down, that bombing? Is there a... Yeah, but that's the videos that everybody has been trying to get that remember... See, they just did a piece on... Oh, what was it? One of the History Channel and they desperately try... I've noticed they try to avoid showing the imagery anymore, but when you see the blast side of the building, and you look right across the street every time they show the oklahoma images and try not to show a detail shot not they can or if they do they go hyper close into the wreckage because there's lots of those but if you see that where you look at it from if you look at the expo the exploded side the blown outside of the building and you look uh... from if you're seeing it from the intersection on the left side The image right across the street literally there is a row of cameras that were all pointed at the Murrah Building Yeah, I think some of them at varying distances some of them were fairly distant that would still get a wide shot. Oh no no no, the ones right on the parking I think there were something like 16 different cameras right? Yes, that snatched all the videotape But all of the cameras, but right there on that line, there are five cameras. Well, actually probably one more pass the smoke and the debris. But right across, parallel with the whole length of the building, these cameras are pointed and were pointed to secure the Murrah Building. And then there are other cameras that overlap, like you said, that secure the parking lot and still look at the Murrah Building. But right across the street... Right across the street, literally where the cars are parked. I mean, if you look, when you see the intersection shot, if you look to the right, right across the kiddie corner, right across the opposite corner from where the Murrah Building is, the first one is right there on a pole, pointed right at the Murrah Building, and they are side by side by side every 20-some, well, it's kind of more than that, probably about 20 yards apart. Now, no more. Right. Football Field Section. The customization and convenience store has video cameras, including some that are outside. Some of them would pick up stuff. All over the place. Overlaps. Yeah, even if it's a distant shot. And all those disappeared. Everything was right. It's just like the pentagram. Why not show the pentagram? Because what they're doing is lying about what happened. Yep. It's the bottom line. What would be so terrible? Let's put it this way. On the one hand, they can show the President of the United States getting a chunk of his head blown off like a chunk of watermelon. We've seen it. Everyone of you have grown up with it. Number two, they don't seem to have any problem showing a plane jumping into the skyscraper on 9-11. So why would they in any way, shape, or form be fearful of showing you what hit the Pentagon? Well, if you look at the Pentagon and pictures of the Pentagon, you'll see that there's cameras all along the edges of how many starlings on a telephone line. And if an airliner had come in and hit that, at least half-a-half of those would have seen that. And not only that, but how many would have been taken if we argued the performance of the aircraft. See, that's an example, is we have a modern version of what happened with the Murrah Building. Remember the pigs in their effort, the FBI, the liars, the FBI, rule number one, how can you tell when a government employee is lying? Well, if they got an alphabet soup letter combination, they are. Remember that the one brother of the one guy that was beat to death at the Mark Twain Air Facility in Oklahoma City, he was beat to death. turns out he wasn't involved at all. Well, his brother, remember, went through the court process and they won to get film released. So what did the FBI do? They gave him footage from totally different cities away from Oklahoma. It was part of their tongue-in-cheek joke. They didn't give him the footage from those cameras. And my problem is this. I don't even know if he thought this way. The problem is I don't trust lawyers in this. Or they become so channeled in the way they work their brains. The footage is all there to show the cameras that he would ask for pay for the footage from not the cameras that are all over like you said became their cameras are all over the city that are run by the Fed if You go to Detroit let me give you an example of that if you go to Detroit the wreckage of these skyscrapers that are there Well, the reason they're not powered down completely, their elevators don't work, all the windows are busted out on every floor, but the reason those buildings are maintained with some access is because up on the step tiers of those older, you know, 30s and 40s constructed and 50s constructed buildings, there are pylons with extreme remote television cameras that the feds run. Probably also official and unofficial cell towers as well. oh yeah that's up in the very, yeah but I'm talking about on the steps of the building guys if you watch if you see pictures of Detroit where they show you the downtown area where you have the older style skyscrapers where they go up 20 stories and they step back in like say for 10-20 feet and then it goes up another pylon and it goes in a little bit again where each of those steps are there is a camera and it's a remote mechanically operated they can zoom in it's got hyper telephoto lenses they're the gun cameras that are about four to five feet long and they're encased in armor so they're weatherized. Well, those are all in place in Oklahoma the same way. And that was some of the stuff that they wanted because, you know, there's some shop that was out there for just a few minutes in the first few days, which was a camera run by somebody else from the Fed. And it showed the smoke and the dust from the Murrah Building and the initial action after the explosion. They didn't show the explosion. They just showed the dust rising up. Kind of like watching a distant version of the images from 9-11 from, you know, New York. Well, there's a whole hell of a lot of other cameras that were running, like you said, and well, let's put it this way. The BS about how they caught McVay's, you know, van on film. Really? And anybody ever watch that? It's a camera image from a security camera inside a bank looking at a reflected piece of glass, and the only thing you can be sure is that there's a rider truck going by, maybe, and you can't even be sure fully of that. There's nobody can't tell who's in the cab You can't tell what size truck it is But that the big old yellow rider thing which was notorious you know back in the day Was out there in force and they wouldn't see that if it were clear enough to show that there were two people in the cab Exactly. Yeah, in fact it would be to then it would be well there never was any footage all those cameras didn't work that day or they didn't work that well and the reflection was so horrible and Well, multiple cameras all had technical difficulties all at the same time. Every single one. That was the official story. Now, that's the thing that has changed on the battlefield. And it's one of the biggest problems with, again, every lie that they generate now, actually, just as we were able to catch them in their technology lies because of a progressive reconstruction of what they had already released. Today, it can be done right down to the personal incident level because of the preponderance of privately owned technologies that are readily available in our fingertips. Now, people may have put themselves at risk, I think, you know, like I said, people playing football player, you know, their arm out behind them with the camera on their ass while they're busy running and they're supposedly, they're life and death and there's gunfire or fire explosions or whatever. But my God, people are doing everything they can to catch footage of whatever is going on. So yeah, they would like to have the next video they can sell for 50 grand. Yeah, they got the epic, you know. So in that respect the bad guys have a real problem because if everybody were working together more efficiently, then you've got a situation where literally you can produce, unlike Hollywood with all the BS with only a limited number of cameras, You could truly produce a three-dimensional image and a complete evaluation of what was going on. Were you able to more efficiently access that system? And if people have a place to integrate the information, which to a degree does exist, then it would be even more damning for the bad guys. You know, he was resisting, no, the two guys were holding his arms and you were choking him to death. That incident with the kid who was being choked out where the cops already had him in handcuffs. and gee they took one handcuff off and they're kinda holding his arms while bruiser, a guy bigger than me with a bald head, is chocking the man to death. Now that got caught because it just happened somebody was in the right place to be able to look through a spot and they didn't know that they had somebody else they needed to go beat down with a billy club. But that's what we're talking about here. This is not going to be where the, oh, you know, those evil people that owned the cows, they did this, and we had to kill everybody. And, you know, think about the story without the proper, you know, independent technologies with the Bundy Ranch, with what just happened. It would have been all those scofflaws and they needed to be killed and well we took their cows we had to kill some of the cows because they resisted and then we shot a bunch of the protesters and we beat a bunch of them off and we had to kill some more people but they needed killing blah blah blah blah blah. Think about the business. The only information you had about that is what came through a printed newspaper? Yeah. Yeah, think about it. Only instead the dynamic has changed completely. This is where we do have the energy in the right place. Now, will it last forever? Well, as soon as it gets really, really bad, the bad guys will shut off grids, which is why we need to be ready with alternatives. This is something else. Go ahead. Mark, you know the thing is I know it's in the garage sales, though, because everybody's relying on these camera phones. It's like those digital cameras are starting to get real really yes and grab all of them you can because of the price of the quality of many of those are more than sufficient for doing movie or video productions and you gotta remember something do to them what you know you do that use the techniques that they use for all the stuff that they have fabricated to kill create i can be from the other direction you know when we do filming also up even though they're older and newer cameras guys uh... also that multiple cameras I've been doing this for decades. When we did some of the live shootings that were, you know, filming back in the 90s, early 90s, middle 90s, when we were doing some of the rain shots, I'd have a camera downrange pointed at the guys doing the live fire while we were busy doing maneuver and everything else. And it was all choreographed. So you actually had live fire. As I've pointed out a lot of videos, we didn't use blanks for anything. When you see people shooting, you see people interacting and crossing through people, that's all live fire. Now the cameras were brought in, we couldn't afford 800,000 dollar cameras back in the day, not one, not five or ten of them, but if everybody brings in their equipment, then we coordinated it so that we would have a camera image over the shoulder of the shooter, a camera image front and facing the live fire as the bullets are going by the camera. the camera monitoring and ground angle, another camera mounting an overhead angle. And so the advantage of that is that we could actually pull. Well today you can do it with even greater ease. Look at the digital quality of these older cameras that are, you know, there's a step where we reached a peak and now they've come down in quality because other stuff is taking the market to a degree. Well that peak wave right there with the technology allows you to have phenomenal quality in a box. Now you can have four, five, or six cameras. That's why they really hated the Huttari videos. The guy who was doing it was a cinematographer. Okay, that's what he wanted to be. He was a student, but he was developed. If you look at the Huttari videos, they're very dynamic. And while that's happening, You got a ground shot looking up with the guys jumping over the camera. The same shot is reversed or juxtapositioned out in front of them. The next shot is overhead back angle. They move through their ground angles. There's the action, the animals, you know, the dog handlers are right there. The guys with the hutari with the dogs. Everything is in motion. It's dynamic. It's moving. It's interesting. It's inspiring. And it was all done low-tech and they were scared shitless of that. They even said so. The one thing they were scared shitless of is the fact that they were using the tools the way you should and they weren't they weren't embarrassed by it Language that came yeah, I'm sorry that came up in the that came up in Even the paperwork the government did they were it's like when they were when I was when they were after me years ago guys every second paragraph and every second sentence was and he continued to do the radio program Blah blah blah blah blah and he continued to do the serious guys. We've read it on the air. It's like I just stayed on the air Yeah, it was like we were attacking. And he just kept on the air and in that yeah in fact that was a yo This is why you need to hate him because he continued to do the radio program And I'm not exaggerating Ed knows he's had all the pay for everybody a lot of you guys out there read it all But it's the idea guys that they're logic behind. It's like the attack on the Bundy Ranch right now. You got all these people doing all this pee your pants routine where they're regurgitating the Dronatoid BS. Have you noticed this? In the last 24 hours there's been a bunch of people regurgitating the Dronatoid BS from the Bunnies. Well, it's a given. What part of that would you not? We know they've got these tools. Well, you need to pee your pants some more. We need to wrap that. We don't roll that up so that fewer people support what's going on because we're trying to help the enemy so that the situation gets really bad and they murder like those people and we go see we told you it's futile to resist you need to buy another megaphone and you need to you need to ache some more and and shout but not do anything you need to pee your pants and defecate your spine and and and oh Whereas instead it's like any helicopter crew from Vietnam what they felt about the issue of rifle fire from the ground. Yeah. Why do you sit on your helmets so we don't get a bullet up our beep? Yeah. You mean somebody could get around into you from the ground? They did it every day. Yeah, exactly. On that point, and this is a fact, and anybody knows logistics while actually the support train, Every helicopter in Vietnam was shot down at least three times Think about that. In fact, one of the guys that was a pilot with me, well with the headquarters element, guys, the choppers that we received in 81 were the helicopters. It turned out the whole section where helicopters, two of the pilots had been flying during the war and crashed in twice. In fact, they still of course had the patch marks. Even while there we did an article for the division, you know, the paper. It was a news clip thing. He's standing there pointing at the side of the chopper. It was a Huey, a UH1D. Oh, it was a C. Forgive me, it was a late C model. He's pointing. You'll notice that there's these really weird pieces of sheet metal out in the chopper. Why? Well, because when you're in a combat field forward area with maintenance, they just zip the metal open and they just tin canter back together with rivets. And he was the pilot that rode that puppy down when she went in. That was his second Purple Heart. Oh, notice I said second Purple Heart. Yeah, he didn't bounce very well. You know neither did anybody else on board because they all went down together They all wrote her into the ground. Okay. Well, they go out with a pickup truck the wrecker the sky crane drag that wreckage back hammer the parts out throw everything back together and Maybe a week or two out if they washed out the blood and taking the chunky parts off of the areas that were sharp from your body parts that stuck there and They would then turn around and throw a whole new crew in or the same crew if they were still alive and say, congratulations, she's flying again, go to work. But they all got shot down and mostly by, they didn't have a whole lot of SAM 7's kids, they did that all with small arms fire. And a whole lot of people died. Go ahead, jump in their car. Mark, you know what makes me laugh from here, from Infowars, by 2025, there'll be no more ground troops, it's all gonna be fought by robots. Okay, well this is the year 2014, so I'm good with that. Yeah. In fact, listen up. You know what? Let me point something out. How many people have those microwave ovens and stack them up in the barn? Yeah, exactly. I'll show you what to do with them. Now, let me point something else out real quick about that. Let me ask some. Uh, be careful. You watch the latest Robocop? Uh, yes. Okay, now let me ask you, what do you think the weight of one of those little robotoids was? Oh, uh... 300 pounds, 400 pounds? 4 to 5. Well, you know, because we're talking battle armor, we're talking ballistic, but also it's got to be an exoskeleton. He described it as a steel exoskeleton or a titanium exoskeleton. It's got hydraulics, it's got a move, it's doing this. I would say the man-sized ones, at least, if that were real, I'd say at least 800 pounds. Yeah, okay, now here's the thing. Have you ever thought about some of the imagery they show? What happens with physics when you put something in motion that weighs 800 pounds? What happens to its applied energy when it impacts with a surface? Is it increased? It sort of depends on the surface and how deformable it is, but yeah, it experiences a lot of G-Shock. Now let me ask you guys, did you see any of those cars crumpling up to the point where they were dysfunctional or surface areas like on structures, buildings? I mean, I've been in maintenance and construction and I know the thickness of things. Have you thought about the idea, they show all these things bouncing off stuff and gripping off stuff and hanging off stuff? Guys, do you realize what the world would look like as far as just with them bebopping through an area? Now, if the area could support them, because you see the first time they're flying across and they show them doing a somersault, they land at about whatever times the normal force of energy, the normal weight, when it applies to a surface, would they be standing on that surface or would they just keep right on going like it's a comical Hollywood movie? You would see an awful lot of spalled out footprints all over, even concrete. Yes, and of course don't forget that let's talk then about cross country because there's another one. Tom Cruise just did a movie that kind of came and went. It's where he's like having some kind of time flashback but he's a future warrior and they got these exo suits. Is anyone already gone? I've been seeing that in the trailers and wondering whether that was worth seeing. Yeah, I wanted to see more. It's kind of gone into yawn mode because it's another one of those weezer, we're all going to die, but lots of piled up CG and mass and whatever. But here's the thing, you see those exosuits, guys? Have you thought about the battlefield and what it's like? And let's say Earth. Look outside. I'm looking at water, muck, dirt, vines, etc. And they always show you the stuff where they just bebop through this stuff. Now guys, coming up you jump and you do the Superman leap with the Exo suit and you come down at say 4G, 5G. In other words, you don't have an 800 pound suit now or a 400 pound suit. Now you have a 3000 pound suit landing into a surface area where those feet aren't big enough to distribute the weight. You know, this is the problem. All these fools are looking at all this CG camera BS and they're not thinking physics. But of course you can violate physics when you have theater. Well, you have to postulate metals like, you know, everything's titanium alloys and you have to postulate motors that have some incredible power to weight ratios. And you also have to postulate some horrific energy storage because if you start doing the physics, the number of horsepower that has to be applied over half a second in order to accelerate something like that. And then the human inside has to be inside. And there's the other half of it. It's like Iron Man, okay. Because you don't want anything about them extruding through your bottom. Right, I didn't hear anything about inertial dampers on anything, did you guys? Did we get it to start? Okay, what happens, you see here's that thing, it's the only thing, I'll tell you, the best movie. that I love the most is Mars Attacks! It is a comedy, but it is more real with regard to a lot of this BS. Does anybody remember the little space walker battle text that the Martians were running? Yeah. And the one starts to run and he makes that radical corner and that beautiful bubble dome inside you see splat! Because what happens is that the pilot inside still keeps going. Now just think all these stupid scenes that I'm watching with all these exoskeletons and all this stuff. There is no mention about inertial damping in any of them. Which means that when you see Iron Man and he goes flying through the air in these BS latest movies, this is why I have no idea. It's fun eye candy but that's it. Iron Man goes flying off because the rocket suit takes him away, right? And then he goes scutting into this forest that he's chopping trees and he's bumping this and he's bumping that. Well that looks really good except that he was doing 500 miles per hour and he's now found a solid object. The first time... The brain is flashing around and it's... Yeah! The first time he did that guys, all of those body parts were squosed like an egg inside that suit. And then when you hit the next object, they were all sloshed in the other direction. And by the time you're done, when you pick the helmet up and you kind of turn it upside down so you let the neck drop down, all there would be is this like really funny looking red, gray, greeny, slurry stuff with chips of bone that you go, blaaah! I wish somebody would have some fun with the CG system and do that. Look! Look, it's Iron Man! He's landed! Oh, but... You've got a couple of pounds of Iron Man to pour out on the ground. Yeah! And all the rest of this BS, it's like that's why this Tom Cruise-Am watching this and he's flying through the air and he makes this super leap with the Exo suit and he drops to the ground and he lands and I'm like, guys, he just put himself at so many miles per hour of energy forward. He's harnessed in with a little series of straps and racks. Now, he's gonna look really good for a moment while he's flying through the air, but the moment he makes that mega stop that you see there where he goes, ugh! Well, all those places where all those straps are become compression points and the next thing you should hear over his radio set is not him talking and breathing hard while he's going, you know, well we're there! It'd be more like, eeeeaaahhh! Oh! Oh! Well, even if it's perfectly padded, you're still accelerating and detailing the whole squishy parts. Yeah, well, it'd be a nice people bag. Okay? It looks like you got the padding. Actually, that's a lot about taking off at a measly 3G's. Yeah, there would be a people bag there. On the outside, you'd have the soft skin. But on the inside you'd have nothing but crushed folded and spindle parts and wherever your bones broke they would push through and create all kinds of little prickly holes in your people balloon which would be leaking you. The sooner you could get it out of the suit, the sooner you could find some idiot that might get into it because the body fluids aren't stuck to the inside. Mark, what about those endo suits out in the Bundy Ranch? If they are really pinned down, they cook inside that suit out in the south. Well, that's the other half of it. Now you're talking about all the other problems with... And again, everybody goes, well, it would be micro. Everybody's into this micro thing. Well, let me ask you two things about micro. What have you bought that's Chinese that works 100% out of the box? Not so much. because he buys so many of them and you know they when they were given a lump of them they weren't too careful about the fact that anywhere from nine to eleven to fifteen of them didn't work out of the box brand new yeah we used to make a comment about somebody jacked up a cheap copy but the Japanese did better than the Chinese are doing at least it worked kind of no matter how it came out of the box with the Chinese it's just like I don't care if your fingers are stuck in the machine I don't care if you're bleeding, keep running, keep running! And that's true, that's exactly what's happening. Now here's the thing, just think of all the integrated systems that have to be in play, even just the servo hydraulics. For all this BS, you know, at least the, now here's the thing, when you see most of these, at least some of them are a little more honest, and the clunker junker stuff is really bulky and big, because that's the best they could do. Now if they do scale it down, I would liken it to right now what I'm doing, listen to what I'm doing here. Maybe you hear this, okay, I'm wearing a headset. It is a cool space age headset. It is lightweight, it's out of the way, it works really great in this office environment. I have taken this exact same headset model, used it with micro FM radios, and I know I have to have four or five of them over a period of a week or a month in the field because the cord will get caught, it will break, the armature will break, the pivot will break, the heart might break loose. Why? Because it's a light duty piece of equipment. Now, for all of the BS about hyper light and hyper small and hyper tiny, I want you guys to all look at the radio equipment the men are wearing overseas right now in combat. That's very small. Just the one single item. Look what they've done. We went to the Hyper Micro, little earbud CIA type garbage. And you notice that that's all disappeared? You'll notice that the actual guy that's got to be in the field every day, every hour working in a combat environment has got a big ass ear cup. He's got a big ear cup like we used to have on the Hueys, or I'll in fact still do if you're a pilot. He's got a big ear cup system with a large heavy gauge industrial strength boom mic. Well what happened to the hyperspace tiny stuff that was out there? Oh it lasted about three, four days. Well they could have poured it all out of carbon composite and if you make it out of phenolic, you know, resin is just going to break. Yeah, exactly, because you know what, your head gets smacked to the side. The radio gear, you take it off like I'm going to do right now and we're going to be done here in a minute. I take it off, I lay it on the ground, somebody steps on it. It's done. And I might even be the one, because I had to roll out of the way because somebody is taking fire. See, that's the thing about all of this. One of the pictures somebody keeps popping up now is that punky supposed, you know, like, this is the gun that can do anything, you're going to launch it's next generation of grenade launchers. Nobody even noticed that it's a whole fake because the, if you notice there's a panel there that's a dust cover for the ejection port. Did any of the people looking at that picture notice that the ejection port is cast? and that the whole thing is a stinking mock-up. The ejection port is molded right to the body of the thing and doesn't move, which means that it doesn't work, which means where does the spent case go? Oh, that's right. This is one to show you how terrifying it'll be if we ever made this, don't you know? But it's what everybody keeps being pumped with. Yeah. What it is, is it's like the old Windsor plastic rifles. They used to make copies of the Uzi, of the HK pistols, and they were scoped. and they were like 98, well 96 percent correct. And if you looked at them from a distance you could paint them up and they made great Hollywood props. But when you got close you could see that they were all cast and where everything should work it had a casting layer. Look at that stupid thing and tell me how the ejection port works if the ejection port is cast to the body of the weapon that they're showing you. It's BS. Well Mark I heard on Google you should be scared because out of Michigan they're going to be having their driverless cars around. on our worry about that like i said that the sooner that happens a soon-to-get anything and everything where they're going to count on a hundred percent artificial intelligence is a nightmare at best and a failure and uh... failure guaranteed i don't have a problem with it like i said the drones if they were to go to other you know other minds running it slash themselves if they all garbage in garbage out kids and there are so many different ways to mock up like the care was saying hey save up your microwave ovens And you know what? You don't have to destroy it. Don't expect an explosion. Just reverse. If you hit something with a microwave wash and you knock out one servo, what does that do? If you knock out, like say, let's say these exosuits are, you know, the guy standing there and you had everybody fry a component on that, you know, just aim, like I've always told you, guys, if I have a weapon system, I aim for the same spot over and over again, no matter who it is I'm looking at. Why? I'm destroying the same part. I'm creating a parts inventory problem for repair right off the bat. But I'm also destroying the same part that eventually becomes a shortage and completely incapacitates the system. And remember, think another thought here, not all tripwires have to be mechanical. Yeah, exactly. They can be electrical. Yes. You're facing, you know, electrically operated foes that come walking through a field. Tripwires that are electric, if they zap out a single knee motor or hip motor or the microprocessor that runs it or whatnot, suddenly you've got a very immobile target. He's a very impressive pogo stick. Yeah, don't be surprised if you do see those driverless cars, but I'll tell you one thing. I don't think we're going to see those things permitted over about 20 miles an hour for a long, long time. Because I'm a Johnny Cam. That will be urban electric, low speed, short range shuttle cars. They will be limited to a certain area and they will do about 20 miles an hour and everybody else will consider them a pain in the neck because they are road obstacles. until they hit something and they'll find an excuse to sue their arse to the wall and then they'll be gone because somebody's gonna pay for the rest of their operating with all their operating money somebody else who's decided to be a sewer by stepping in front of the car and letting it run over them at less than 20
Recordings of The Intelligence Report are the intellectual property of Mark
Koernke and the Patriot Broadcasting Network, used with permission. The content
present in these recordings and the resulting transcripts are the opinions of
Mark Koernke and do not represent the opinions of the Koernke Archive, its
owners, or its service providers. This website, transcript, and summary content
has been generated with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence tools, and may
contain errors.