Live 365. Storage by harnessing the power of the sun with sun ovens. Food can be baked, boiled or steamed year-round at temperatures of 360 to 400 degrees. Sun ovens are the most energy efficient way to cook freeze-dried food storage and can be used as solar dehydrators or water purifiers. Thousands of preppers regularly use sun ovens and have found they quickly pay for themselves by reducing utility bills. Sun-cooked food stay moisture and never burn. Sun-baked roasts are succulent and sun-baked bread has unparalleled taste and texture. For 28 years, Sun Ovens have been proudly made in the US. They're durable, have a long life, and have a 100% satisfaction guarantee. Don't be fooled by cheap imitations. For a discount, visit sunoven.com. Dream the other night that, well, I didn't understand. A figure walked in through the mist with a flintlock in his hand. His clothes were torn and dirty as he stood there by my bed. He took off his three-cornered hat. And speaking low to me, he said, We fought a revolution to secure our liberty. We wrote the Constitution as a shield from tyranny. For future generations, this legacy we gave. In this, the land of the free and home of the brave. The freedoms we secured for you, we hoped you'd always keep. But tyrants labored endlessly while your parents were asleep. Your freedom's gone, your courage lost, you're no more than a slave. In this, the land of the free and home of the brave. You buy permits to travel and permits to own a gun. Permits to start a business or to build a place for one. On land that you believe you own, you pay a yearly rent. Although you have no voice in saying how the money's spent. Your children must attend a school that doesn't educate. And your Christian values can't be taught according to the state. You read about the current news in a regulated press and you pay a tax you do not owe to please the IRS. Your money is no longer made of silver nor of gold. You trade your wealth for paper so your life can be controlled. You pay for crimes that make our nation turn from God and shame. You've taken Satan's number and you've traded in your name. You've given government control to those who do you harm so they could burn down churches and seize the family farm. And keep our country deep in debt. Put men of God in jail. Harash your fellow countrymen while corrupted courts prevail. Your public servants don't uphold the solemn oaths they've sworn. And your daughters visit doctors so their children will be born. Your leaders send artillery and guns to foreign shores and send your sons to slaughter fighting other people's wars. Can you regain the freedoms for which we fought and died? Or don't you have the courage or the faith to stand with pride? And are there no more values for which you'll fight to save? Or do you wish your children to live in fear and be a slave? O sons of the Republic, arise, take a stand, defend the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the land, preserve our great Republic and each God given right, and pray to God to keep the torch of freedom burning bright. As I awoke, he'd vanished in the mist for whence he came. His words were true, we are not free, but we have ourselves to blame. For even now as tyrants trample each God given right we only watch in tremble too afraid to stand and fight If he stood by your bedside to dream while you were asleep and wondered what remains of the freedoms he'd fought to keep What would be your answer if he called out from the grave is this? And good evening ladies and gentlemen, this is the intelligence report mark quirky won't be with us this evening. He is a fan a Okay. I'm looking at, hey you guys, you're tuned to the Liberty Tree Radio, broadcasting to all points of the compass and to each and every one of our brothers and sisters on and behind the lines. You might be listening on an AM or FM, you might be listening on a CB, you might be listening, hey how about that Indiana Live Talk, PBN.4MG or 365, did I mention that? We'll get to it again sometime. I got a couple things in my hand here and I'm looking for something else to put up because you know what, I found It is the 11th day of March, the year of our Lord, 2014, in a beautiful day it is. I was looking through a drawer here, one of those drawers that sometimes you can access and sometimes you can't because of all the things that are stacked in. You start to get things, particular items in regular places and whatnot. I found my dictionary of American politics and we're going to talk a little bit about some of the things that come out of the dictionary of American politics. And as I zoom around here just a little bit, there's this one thing that came, you know, something's happened with serendipity. That's a big old word and I remember someone had a boat named after that. And later in my life I recognize that word a couple of times because of that. But that's just something you stumble upon by chance, serendipity. Just look at what I found by accident. But again, here in my book of the dictionary of American politics, I could probably give even an ISBN, although this is such an old book. There might not be an ISBN in here. This is a run over here, and maybe we can find one here. can and you'll know. Oh, there is a number. This was last printed in 1944 and last printed in 1965. I told you it was an old book, but there is a, oh, not an ISBN number, but there is a card number. That would be 55-11359. Again, 55-11359. I told you this book was old and again last reprinted in 1965. It's not real old, but it's old enough to be pertinent that it can still carry some things that they'd like to hide as of late. Because you know, lately we've talked about who writes the history and other thoughts along that line. But you guys, one of the things that was discussed as of late in the President's abilities section, let's put it under that, the President can and can't do his abilities. There was talk about can fearless leader order an attack on an American sovereign, an American citizen on foreign land because well, everybody thinks he's a terrorist. Now it doesn't take much to go from an attack on an American citizen on foreign soil to an attack on an American citizen ordered by the President. It doesn't take much. Well, I'm about to surprise you. Are you all sitting down? Indipitously, I opened up just by accident. I should just do that from now on. I don't remember who it was that said in politics. There's no such thing as coincidence. I picked up my dictionary of American politics and opened it up to page 261 right there. I look right here and I just happen to read this Magali That could be Nagel, depending on how it's pronounced, Nagel-in-Ree. Now that's a legal term. That's why it's in this book, A Dictionary of American Politics. But when I went on to read this, I thought that, man, I should bring this one to the hour because, well, just because you might catch an interest in this, I'm going to read you the Dictionary of American Politi- definition of this Nagel-in-Ree. This is a historic note. follow along with this. Again, this is history and this is right there in the dictionary of American politics. Nagel Henry, case involving a federal deputy marshal who, in the performance of a duty imposed upon him by presidential order, had killed an assailant and had been indicted for murder by a state court. The marshals transfer from the state to a federal court for trial. turned upon the question whether he acted under a, quote, law of the United States, close quote, although this has all been quoted from the dictionary here. The Supreme Court, 131st US, won 1890. So this is old. This is into almost antiquity of America. The Supreme Court, 135 US, won in 1890. declared that the order given Nagel had been issued under presidential constitutional authority to see that the laws are faithfully executed and to preserve the peace of the United States. In other words, the order was issued under the president's constitutional prerogatives and so, and rather as such, was to be regarded as a quote, law of the United States, close quote. Also see Debs in Re. Now I'm going to read this to you again because this is pretty deep. There's a whole lot here one can understand that shouldn't be here in America. There's a precedent. This is why I'm reading this. This is why we're bringing this to you. Again, Nagel in Re. case involving a federal deputy marshal who, in the performance of a duty imposed upon him by presidential order, had killed an assailant and had been indicted for murder by a state court. The marshal's transfer from the state to a federal court for trial turned upon the question whether he acted under a law of the United States. The Supreme Court, 135 U.S. 1, in 1890 declared that the order given Nagel had been issued under the President's constitutional authority to see that the laws are faithfully executed and to preserve the peace of the United States. In other words, the order was issued under the President's constitutional prerogatives, as thought to be regarded as a law of the United States. So see Debs in Re. Now, Because it says also see Debs in Rea, I wasn't able to read that one before the hour, but I did find it here just because it says so and it refers us over to it. I'm going to read it like a cold call from a salesman because I've never read this one before. Debs in Rea case 158 US 564, this happened in 1895 in which the United States Supreme Court declared that the federal government has authority to protect its interests in the mails and the flow of interstate commerce, and that such authority includes the discretionary power of its officers to secure injunctive relief from the courts. Wow, did you catch that? I haven't read this before. And again, I'm glad I did this. How surreptitious is this? A case, this is Debs and Rees, this is legal history, this is also legal history to the extent that it's in the dictionary of American politics. Wow, Debs and Rees says a case, 158 U.S. 564, this happened in 1895. in which the United States Supreme Court declared that the federal government has authority to protect its interest in the males and the flow of interstate commerce, and that such authority includes the discretionary power of its officers to secure injunctive relief from the courts. Wow. Now, with that in mind, let's go over here and go back to this Nago RE, or rather in RE. Pickly, if you pick that apart, I read that twice for a reason. But if you pick that part apart, a federal deputy killed someone in the performance of his duty that was ordered by the president. And he was indicted for murder in the state in which that action occurred. The state saw enough in this action that the state thought they should bring state charges against the federal officer. Forgive me for the stumble there. But now, Along comes, they take this to the Supreme Court, a federal court. The officials transfer from state to a federal court for trial turned upon the question whether he acted under a law of the United States trying to de-link the laws of the land from the laws of the state. See how that works? They've been doing this for over a hundred years. Now this happened in 1890. Now that's like and 24 years ago. What are you even talking about that for? It has no relevance. It is relevant unto today. It happened in 1890. So they've been doing this for 124 years. Yeah, 90, put a 10 there, bring another 10 onto it, and four. In 124 years, the Supreme Court has basically said that it's okay if a federal officer murders someone in a state and the state can't bring charges against that person even if the state decides that there's enough evidence to bring charges against that person for murder. We have been each individual state that created the federal government by binding itself to the other states in agreement. The laws have been usurped. by the federal government which has no bind upon the state. Other than that, which apparently here the Supreme Court says that our federal officers can murder someone in the state and the state can't bring charges against that federal officer even if they believe that, well, it's to bring charges. Now, with that in mind, let's go back over here because this is to me also this Debs Henry, a case 158 US 564. This happened only 19 years ago in 1895, in which the United States Supreme Court declared, that's a legal word, declared that the federal government has authority to protect its interests in the males and the flow of interstate commerce. And that such authority includes the discretionary power of its officers to secure injunctive relief from the court. I did mean to murder that man, but I'm doing it in the name of the President, or I'm doing it in the name of the Federal Government. Oh my gosh. Golly gee, it had never happened here, and not in America. For all you people that say it would never happen here, did you note that the first one, the Nagel in Re, happened in 1890? And the next one, Deb's in Re, happened in 1895? We need to let these things soak in. This comes before the War Powers Act, doesn't it? If I remember rightly, and I don't think I'm reaching there. This comes before, I know it for a fact. This comes before the War Powers Act. Basically the Supreme Court said the federal government has right to make war individually on the states, the states that created the federal government. Go figure on that. Can the master, can the servant be greater than the master? quit-dog. Can the servant be greater than the master? That's spiritual. Answer that. Punch in Bible studies and can the servant be greater than the master? Look at all the examples there. Apparently for 124 years the Supreme Court says it's okay for the federal government to murder us long before the War Powers Act. In 1895, The United States Supreme Court backed that thought line up with the decision that authority includes the discretionary powers of its officers to secure injunctive relief from the courts. Now, did you know that? Because you know what, 24 hours ago I didn't know that. That's why I'm bringing it to you now. 24 hours ago I didn't know that. I wonder 124 years ago how many people, how many Americans read this Supreme Court decision in their paper. They didn't hear it on the radio. I wonder how many of them took the telegraph, you know, and picked it up and read the Supreme Court decision that day, or the next day read it front page headlines, your federal government is allowed to murder you. With that in mind, how many of them, if one half of one percent were made aware of it, how many of them talked about it? Now, this is a communications Tuesday, isn't it? In mind, I'm going to go over here. I'm going to stand on a different soapbox. I'm going to come from a different angle, that's it. Stand on a different salt box, see, change position, never so slightly, but still the same. You can stand in a different place and still hold the same position. See how that works? That's why a soldier moves from place to place. He's still there to kill his enemies, but he's moving. He's changing position, literally. Not in his mind. But even in his mind, he's changing position. I don't mean to double talk you. But his conviction's the same. no matter his position. A better way to put that. But with this in mind, you guys, even before the War Powers Act, the federal government said it's okay for the feds to shoot to kill American citizens. And I wonder how long ago. With thoughts like that, it's no wonder that even before the Great Depression, you know, followed by other smaller depressions and the Great Recession, read that depression that we're in. that people would exercise such things like, well, I don't care what the feds have to say, I'm going to make this whiskey anyway. But now that goes over to the Deb's part in 1885, doesn't it? Because making a whiskey might involve interstate commerce. And the feds have control over interstate commerce. Again, something that is as if saying, I built this road out here. Now the road has control over what I do. Now that might be a real way too simple analogy, but it's true, isn't it? I built the road, now the road has control over what I do. Because the feds didn't build the roads. Not in 1890 they didn't. Did you know so, so long ago? Way back. That farmer was responsible for the road in front of his property. He was to upkeep the road in front of his property. and build the roads in 1890. They were still sure, chomping at the bit to get at interstate commerce, weren't they? Sound familiar today? Can you say, let's tax the internet? Can you say, you know, within the Constitution that interstate commerce is not to be taxed, but aren't they looking at taxing? And this seems to be a bit slightly less than, oh, the states will just come out and shoot you, rather the feds will just come out and shoot you no matter what state you live in. That's a better way, you know, sometimes I get a little bit ahead of myself, bear with me. But is it really worth saying that we're going to tax the Internet, interstate commerce? If I take a moment here and shuffle through, I'd have to be quiet and not have to read parts of sentences and whatnot. Right over here in my pocket Constitution it says that the United States government will not tax interstate commerce. No commerce between states is to be taxed. Well, apparently the Feds will tell you soon that anything that happens on the Internet doesn't happen between states. You watch. You watch. That way they'll be able to tax the Internet, anything that happens off the Internet. You know, if I sell a piece of night vision to a guy in Maryland or Florida, any state but California, I send it to him. He doesn't pay any taxes on it. Now, some states will urge you, you know, on the top of that income tax form, or someplace that says voluntary or they try to hide that to where you can't even figure out is voluntary anymore. But on a lot of states they'll ask you, did you order anything by mail? Or they'll put it, it can be done a number of different ways. And then they'll say, what was the value? and divide that by 6%, or 9%, or 12%, or 99%, whatever the tax is in your state. And now send us that money because you owe taxes on it. You owe taxes on interstate commerce. So we kind of got off a little tangent there, but again, the interstate thing and the states binding themselves together, creating the federal government, Remember that, creating the federal government cannot be greater than the states. But the Supreme Court will tell you, again, let me go back here, because just for yourself, in Nagel RE, this happened in 1990, the Supreme Court 135 US 1, has declared that the order given Nagel had been issued by the under the President's constitutional authority to see that laws are faithfully executed and to preserve the peace of the United States. So if the President figures that we need to preserve the peace, he can order any Fed to go out and kill any American citizen. Why sure, it's been going on since 1890, but it had to happen before 1890 because this court decision came down in 1890. I don't know if it was the very first one or the very last one. It might have happened in 1890, but odds are it takes a little while to get to the Supreme Court, even back in the 1880s. Just don't say, I'm going to take this to the Supreme Court and you're there the next day. You might be there the next day after you've failed in other courts and you move up and up the appeal until one day you're taking it to the Supreme Court. You're paying your filing fees and whatnot. Better than 124 years, the US government has been able to kill people at their discretion, kill American citizens. Now one could understand that if the President can do it, what was it at the time? Wasn't there a Secretary of War at the time? Yes, there was in the department. Secretary of War? I think it was Secretary of War around 1890. I wonder if he had that power to And I wonder if the Secretary of State being foreign or here could just say, off with his head. And some said it wouldn't over there with a big ax and go lop and the person would bleed out real quick and you'd hear the thump and, well not necessarily in that order but, you know, the thump of the ax and the thump of the head hitting the floor and the bleed out. That's a little more proper in the order but... Does it seem like Don is just sitting here and making this stuff up? Because you can get your own copy of the dictionary of American politics. Again, this one was last printed in 1955, printed in 1944. It was reprinted in 1946 and 1949 by Barnes and Nobles. Its library card catalog number is 5-11359. This is such an old book. There is no ISBN number for it. is such an old book. Let me look and see if Smith, Zuker are the authors. Z-U-R-C-H-E-R. And we're going to go to break. In fact, that would be really appreciated right now, Eddie, if we could take about a minute and a half, maybe three. HempUSA.org urges everyone to plan ahead for possible food shortages in the future. We offer this dense nutrient-storeable food directly from the farm to your door. What the world needs is our energy-packed hemp food in a storeable, portable form that can easily and quickly be picked up for travel. This food contains readily available protein, amino acids, essential fatty acids, digestive enzymes, and major minerals. Visit HempUSA.org or call 908-691-260-8. And with prices rising in every sector, the investment in your future is critical to have some storeable food available. It wasn't raining when Nala built the Ark, so be practical and be wise. Call 908-691-2608 and place your order today. If food shortages don't come, you can always rotate our hemp foods back into your daily food supply. To place your order, learn more and see numerous other great products, visit hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608. way today. Thousands of preppers regularly use sun ovens and have found they quickly pay for themselves by reducing utility bills. Sun-cooked foods stay moisture and never burn. Sun-baked roasts are succulent and sun-baked bread has unparalleled taste and texture. For 28 years sun ovens have been proudly made in the US. They're durable, have a long life, and have a 100% satisfaction guarantee. Don't be fooled by cheap imitations. For a discount, visit sunoven.com backslash liberty tree. That's www.sunoven.com backslash liberty tree. For more time, that's www.sunoven.com backslash liberty tree. We all need to prepare ourselves. You might have the food, water, gold and silver, but ask yourself, are you truly prepared? That's why you need to visit mainmilitary.com. Mainmilitary.com carries everything you need. Gas masks, fire starter kits, high capacity magazines, chemical suits, military surplus items, and much more. You own a firearm. Mainmilitary.com has a large selection of pistols and rifles suited for your needs. Are your local stores sold out of ammunition? Call or visit them today for prices on hard to find ammo and bulk ammo orders. You don't need to worry about having a military surplus store in your area because MaineMilitary.com is the only store you'll ever need, all from the comfort of your computer. Visit them online today at MaineMilitary.com. That's Maine, like the state, Military.com. I'm back. Maybe Don is. Oh, that's okay. We're back. I had the mute on. Oh, yeah, there we go. That doesn't promote habitual recurrences on professional radio, does it? Yeah, it had a mute on. But again, we're back, you guys. The Intelligence Report on this, the 11th day of March. Now, I want to continue along this thought line because, again, I've just been aware of this, and this is something that, well, we'll get more into this, but I want to be a bit repetitive here just in case you tuned in and didn't catch the front here. It's always good kind of sometimes to repeat things because well you heard it once and man it was so hard to believe the first time and I read it again and I could hardly believe it myself and I've read this a number of times through the day at least the Nagel RE in RE. Now Let's read that again because this is stunning you guys. This is something well more on what this something really what has evolved from this but this is Nagel in re a case involving a federal deputy federal deputy Marshall who the performance of a duty imposed upon him by presidential order had killed an assailant and Had been indicted for murder by a state court the marshals transfer from a state to a federal court for trial turned upon the question whether he acted under a law of the United States. That's in quotes, law of the United States. That was the issue that took this to the Supreme Court, 135 US 1 in 1890. The Supreme Court declared that the order given Nagel had been issued under the President's constitutional authority to see that the laws are faithfully executed and to preserve the peace of the United States. In other words, the order was issued under the President's constitutional prerogatives and, as such, was to be regarded as a law of the United States. Also see Debs in Re. Now, we could work on the very last sentence of that for the rest of the hour here too because basically the Supreme Court in this case, Supreme Court says that let's run that again. The President's constitutional prerogatives and as such was to be regarded as the law of the United States. Let's do some what ifs here. We'll do some what-ifs and then some because-of-vises, okay? And sometimes I strive to speak proper English, and sometimes a brain cell gets ahead of another and it stumbles and you actually hear that. But now think about this. The president's constitutional prerogatives and as such was regarded as the law of the United States. If fearless leader or the next president takes it under his, see constitutional prerogatives is included in there, takes it under his, not just prerogatives, not just, this is something I want to do because, gee, because I've always wanted to kick an ant hill, you know what I mean? Or shoot that shotgun into the bee's nest when I'm only three feet away. I always wanted to do that. But again, the President's constitutional prerogatives and as such to be regarded as law of the United States. So if the President can convince the Supreme Court that it is constitutional that his prerogative is to sweep up all the guns, it is apparent that if it is presented that way, the Supreme Court has to agree with him. But wait, you say, the Supreme Court has already told us we can own guns. Yeah, but that wasn't brought under the President's constitutional prerogative, was it? That was brought under somebody's challenge, saying this is illegal or that is illegal. See how that works? It wasn't the President that brought about the Supreme Court. According to the Supreme Court, now this goes over to executive orders and other things, but according to the Supreme Court, according to Nagel and Rea, Again, Supreme Court 135 US 1 in 1890. If the President, by his prerogative, under constitutional authority, see constitutional authority, all he has to do is say I'm addressing the Constitution here and he gains that umbrella of defense in this act. This is my constitutional authority, whether it's constitutional or not. That's how it will be sold. It will be an executive order. Presidential, see executive orders can be the color of law or be made to be both. to mind. Let's continue with some what ifs here because this is such a broad door here. It's like you can't shoot this because the whole side of the barn is a door. You open a door and you can't shoot the barn, right? Again, that's not a real great analogy. But there are those who would see it that way. If I can see it that way, you can bet that some twisted mind of a lawyer is going to take these words and say the President can do anything he wants as long as it's under his constitutional prerogative. And then when that twisted mind of a lawyer takes it to the Supreme Court, why, here's the President here and it's 124 years old. My, my. Now, let's go, we've got beyond most of the kind of what if and can you believe, because I couldn't believe this when I read it. I couldn't believe it. Now, it's not written into this here, Dictionary of American Politics. It's not on a blank page and it's not written in by hand. It's not as if somebody had a dream and wrote this down in the back of the book. This is right here between Navy, Department of the and near versus Minnesota. It's in its own alphabetical order. It fits right in here. Nagel in Re. So if you've never heard of it before, look it up for yourself. Again, Supreme Court 135, U.S. 1, 1890. And at the bottom of this case, they say, see also Debs in Re. Now, there has to be some man's name, D-E-B-S. Debs And I go back over here to page 110 and look down almost to the bottom of the page and right here is Debs in Re. And I'll read that one to you again because again this is hard to believe. This is the Supreme Court backing itself up saying yeah what we said earlier was okay. Because understand that's what this is. The Supreme Court says we told you so and now we're telling you so again. Debs in Re states a case, 158 U.S. 564 in 1895, I'll repeat that, a case, 158, U.S. 564 in 1895, in which the United States Supreme Court declared that the federal government has authority to protect its interests in the mails and the flow of interstate commerce and that such authority includes the discretionary power of its officers to secure injunctive relief from the courts. Yes, your honor, I murdered that man, but I'm asking you not to bring any charges because I was doing the work of the President, or I was doing the work of the Federal Government, or I was just out on a Saturday night and I shot him just for, you know, poops and grins. But I'm a Federal officer, forgive me. I didn't mean to say that. There's another phrase, I tried to get past it real quick in my mind, but it came out. But again, I was out on Saturday night and I shot him just because I wanted to. Now I'm asking the court for relief here. I'm asking the court to dismiss these charges based on cases from 1890 and 1895. Well, yes sir. These charges are dismissed. Now that's just a scenario made up between a few brain cells from Don's head, just a little bit of imagination there. But let's say, why that had never happened in America, Don? Why does Langho Yuchi walk free? Ron Horiyuchi, a free man. There we mention his name again. Maybe he'll come to my door one day or maybe he'll be the coward hiding back in there in the bushes while I have to deal with his team. But again, you call particular people to the front and center and sometimes they want to call you on the carpet or the raslin' pads or the field of dishonorable battle in this example. I truly do mean that. of dishonorable battle in this example. But why is it that the guy who shot a mother holding a child in her arms, unarmed, holding a child in her arms, why is it that that man walks free? In fact, it really truly is. Why is it that Lan Hui Yu Chi walks free? Need I read to you, Nagel and Rhee? Need I read that again? Need I read Debs and Rhee? in 1895 in which the United States Supreme Court declared that the federal government has authority to protect its interest in the males and the flow of interstate commerce and that such authority includes the discretionary power of its officers to ensure, to secure, rather, injunctive relief from the courts. This is why most cases never go to court. This is again why Lon Horiyuchi walks a free man for shooting a mother with her child in her hands. in her arms. Blow in half of the sight of her head off. Yeah, I said that. That's kind of rude. But, you know, referring to it is not near as rude as the action is doing it. In fact, the action it's doing is not rude. It's deadly. But these are all things. Why, how long ago was Ruby Ridge? In your lifetime. Every one of you that's listening. In your lifetime. But here we are talking about things that your grandfathers and perhaps your great grandfathers weren't even aware of or were not made aware of. Supreme Court decisions that say why if that Federal officer 125 years ago decided on a Saturday night just to shoot your grandfather, your great grandfather just because he thought it was expedient, just because he thought it preserved the peace. It didn't matter. I had seven shots of whiskey in me. I did it to preserve the peace because he was wanting to beat me up. Think about it. We sit and we talk about the War Powers Act and the federal government making war on us since after World War I. Well, it's only a higher form, isn't it? It's only codified. The Supreme Court has made decision on it. The Court said it's okay. And once those handcuffs were taken off, once that monster was loosed from the hall, Well, they had to codify it. They had to make laws around it. Think about it. That's what they did with the War Powers Act. They had to give structure to their murder in American citizens by American citizens. So they did. And again, as an example by the dictionary of American politics here in Nagelverte, RE, and Debs, RE, it just did not just spring from the War Powers Act. As the American people's control and the Let's do it like this. The American people built the states. The states built the federal government. But as the federal government's power grew and grew to the extent that it believed it was old, that it had right to tell each individual state what to do, again, the servant cannot exceed the master. Can the servant tell the master what to do? The servant can tell the master it's raining outside. The guy can call up the Oh, you know, the big long car, the limousine. And he says, send me out James with the limousine ice on the roads and we can't, it's just unsafe. And the car's gonna get there or James ain't gonna have a job. Now that's on an employment level. That is not on a federal government, a servant, and a master level. Because think about this. Let's be real clear about this. This is something that not a whole lot of people are addressing, but the created, the federal government, not so that the states would serve the federal government. Again, can the master slaves, can the master, can that which is created be better than the creator? Think about it. I did get that word slaves in there. It should have been servants because we don't have slaves here in America, do we? But wait a minute, if master says, go out and kill that slave, I mean citizen, and that person does, well, are you really your own master? Ask yourself that question. And if this is true, if you pose these things unto yourself, if you bring these thought lines into that most sophisticated battlefield computer on the planet, that gray meta between your ears, because I've been pondering on this for a good portion of the day now. I've been thinking about this and ruminating on it. and just chewing it around ruminating. I'm not trying to be redundant here. I've been thinking about this one for most of the day since I found this about 1 o'clock. That's why I thought I'd bring it to the hour here. It goes farther back than that. But you have to see that, again, this is on a small scale compared to the War Powers Act. This is an individual determination. Whereas the War Powers Act was against the whole of the citizenry. Understand that and then you can see for yourself more plainly how gradualism fits into the thought line that has been presented for most of the last hour. We tell him that the President sent somebody out to kill a criminal. He was an assailant and because he was an assailant the Supreme Court is going to back it up. But then later, the Supreme Court, five years later, says, well, the Feds have right to just basically being given a free hand by the courts. That's why I've spent this hour bringing this thought line to you. Because it's not just a thought line, it's American history. And again, see the gradualism, because 40 years before that, oh yeah, 40 years before 1890, The Federal Government had driven us. You and I, well it wasn't me and you, we weren't born yet, but the American citizen, both North and South, the Federal Government, the United States citizens, to such a point that we were shooting each other. Now ponder on that one. After they got us shooting each other for a while, that was the most bloody war America ever was involved in. It's no coincidence that Americans were shooting Americans. I mixed those statements together. The most bloody war America was ever involved in was Americans shooting Americans. The rest of the world needs to pay attention to that. We choose not to shoot each other. If you come here and we choose to shoot you, Boy, you're going to have a hard time for the rest of the day. You're going to have a hard time for the rest of the week. If we don't find you that week, you're going to have a hard time for the rest of the month. And if you last a month, you're going to have a hard time for the rest of the year. And a year after that, if your slime ball is still hiding. You know, think about it. Because when we win, that's not an if. And it's not speculation. When we win, A whole bunch of things like Nagel vs. this or the other thing and just kid can you imagine how that was allowed to exist. We have pointed that out in a number of ways as of late and for the 22 years that the intelligence report has been on the air. It should not be allowed to exist. And when we win, well the department of redundancy department is going to go and the other department is going to go and The department that says it's okay for American Federales to shoot American citizens, well that's out the door. Did you know that after the American war for independence, there was hardly an attorney in the land for more than 10 years? Did you know that? Did you know we got along pretty good? You wonder, well who kept the peace done? Who made, well there were local sheriffs. The sheriff says, you stole that chicken. You give the chicken back or you compensate that man for that chicken. That's generally what happened They didn't have to go to lawyers for a recourse And if the sheriff said we you you stole that horse and you know what we do to horse thieves Well, you've got your neck strung up, but you've got your neck stretched the next day Maybe that day maybe they'd even slap the butt of the horse you stole as it rides out from under you As it walks or runs out from under you But again, things were a lot more local before the feds started getting way too big. And we are at the top, and I have the exit stage left, you guys. Thanks for putting up with me. I learned a lot today. I was happy to share it with you. Coming up next is the broadcast of the last United States Pan Intelligence Report. Thank you Eddie, that worked. How do you plan to cook without power? Over 50,000 preppers have chosen to stretch their fuel storage by harnessing the power of the sun with sun ovens. Food can be baked, boiled, or steamed year-round at temperatures of 360 to 400 degrees. Sun ovens are the most energy efficient way to cook freeze-dried food storage and can be used as solar dehydrators or water purifiers. Thousands of preppers regularly use sun ovens and have found they quickly pay for themselves by reducing utility bills. Sun-cooked foods stay moisture and never burn. Sun-baked roasts are succulent and sun-baked bread has unparalleled taste and texture. For 28 years sun ovens have been proudly made in the US. They're durable, have a long life, and have a 100% satisfaction guarantee. Don't be fooled by cheap imitations. For a discount, visit sunoven.com backslash libertytree. That's www.sunoven.com backslash libertytree. One more time, that's www.sunoven.com backslash libertytree. 365. HempUSA.org urges everyone to plan ahead for possible food shortages in the future. We offer this dense, nutrient-storeable food directly from the farm to your door. What the world needs is our energy-packed hemp food in a storeable, portable form that can easily and quickly be picked up for travel. This food contains readily available protein, amino acids, essential fatty acids, digestive enzymes, and major minerals. Visit HempUSA.org or call 908-691-2608. And with prices rising in every sector, the investment in your future is critical to have some storeable food available. It wasn't raining when Noah built the Ark, so be practical and be wise. Call 908-691-2608 and place your order today. If food shortages don't come, you can always rotate our hemp foods back into your daily food supply. To place your order, learn more and see numerous other great products, visit hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608. today. MainMilitary.com has a large selection of pistols and rifles suited for your needs. Are your local stores sold out of ammunition? Call or visit them today for prices on hard to find ammo and bulk ammo orders. You don't need to worry about having a military surplus store in your area because MainMilitary.com is the only store you'll ever need, all from the comfort of your computer. Visit them online today at MainMilitary.com. That's Main, like the state, Military.com.